Journals / Androloji Bülteni / 2022 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Grafts for surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease

Peyronie hastalığının cerrahi tedavisinde kullanılan greft türleri

Pages
67–72
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to present the advantages and disadvantages of grafts used in the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease in the light of the current literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Peyronie’s disease is a pathology of uncertain etiology progressing with fibrosis in the tunica albuginea layer of the penis and resulting in calcified plaque formation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These plaques may cause pain and deformities such as penile curvature, shortening, and narrowing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to present the advantages and disadvantages of grafts used in the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease in the light of the current literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Peyronie’s disease is a pathology of uncertain etiology progressing with fibrosis in the tunica albuginea layer of the penis and resulting in calcified plaque formation. These plaques may cause pain and deformities such as penile curvature, shortening, and narrowing. Surgical treatment is the gold standard in severe states in which the clinical course of Peyronie’s disease has stabilized. Three different surgical techniques are applied, depending on the patient’s clinical manifestation, one of these being graft use and penile tunical lengthening procedure. Four types of graft are employed for penile tunical lengthening procedures –autografts, allografts, xenografts, and synthetic grafts. Each has its own specific advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this review is to present the advantages and disadvantages of grafts used in the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease in the light of the current literature.

Özet

Peyronie hastalığı penisin tunika albuginea tabakasında fibrozis ile seyre- den, nedeni tam olarak bilinmeyen ve kalsifiye plak oluşumuyla sonuç- lanan bir patolojidir. Bu plaklar peniste ağrı, eğrilik, kısalma ve daralma gibi şikâyetlere neden olabilir. Klinik tablonun stabil hale geldiği ciddi durumlarda cerrahi tedavi altın standart yöntemdir. Hasta kliniğine göre üç farklı cerrahi teknik uygulanabilir ve greft kullanımı ile penil tunikal uzatma işlemleri bunlardan biridir. Penil tunikal uzatma cerrahileri için otogreft, allogreft, ksenogreft ve sentetik greft olmak üzere dört farklı greft tipi kullanılır. Her greftin kendine özgü avantajları ve dezavantaj- ları mevcuttur. Bu derlemenin amacı Peyroni hastalığının cerrahi teda- visinde kullanılan greftlerin avantaj ve dezavantajlarını güncel literatür eşliğinde sunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDENİZ, E., ULUBAY, M., KÜÇÜK, E., ATİLLA, M. K. (2022). Grafts for surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Androloji Bülteni, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 67–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/439605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Lue TF. Peyronie’s disease: a critical appraisal of current diagnosis and treatment. Int J Impot Res. 2008
  2. 445– 59. [CrossRef ] 2. Bilgutay AN, Pastuszak AW. Peyronie’s Disease: A Review of Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2015
  3. 117–31. [CrossRef ] 3. Pavone C, D’Amato F, Dispensa N, Torretta F, Magno C. Smoking, diabetes, blood hypertension: possible etiologic role for Peyronie’s disease? Analysis in 279 patients with a control group in Sicily. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015
  4. 20–4. [CrossRef ] 4. Kadioglu A, Oktar T, Kandirali E, Kendirci M, Sanli O, Ozsoy C. Incidentally diagnosed Peyronie’s disease in men presenting with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2004
  5. 540–3. [CrossRef ] 5. Capoccia E, Levine LA. Contemporary Review of Peyronie’s Disease Treatment. Curr Urol Rep. 2018
  6. [CrossRef ] 6. Gelbard MK, Dorey F, James K. The natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1990
  7. 1376–9. [CrossRef ] 7. Devine CJ Jr, Horton CE. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with a dermal graff. J Urol. 1974
  8. 44–9. [CrossRef ] 8. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, Corona G, Jones TH, Kadioglu A, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines: Sexual and Reproductive Health, 8: PENILE CURVATURE. https://uroweb. org/guideline/sexual-and-reproductive-health/#8 9. Austoni E, Colombo F, Mantovani F, Patelli E, Fenice O. Radical surgery and conservation of erection in Peyronie’s disease. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1995
  9. 359–64. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/8589753/ 10. Dalkin BL, Carter MF. Venogenic impotence following dermal graft repair for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1991
  10. 849–51. [CrossRef] 11. Kadioglu A, Sanli O, Akman T, Ersay A, Guven S, Mammadov F. Graft materials in Peyronie’s disease surgery: a comprehensive review. J Sex Med. 2007
  11. 581–95. [CrossRef ] 12. Chang JA, Gholami SS, Lue TF. Surgical management: saphenous vein grafts. Int J Impot Res. 2002
  12. 375–8. [CrossRef ] 13. Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, Jordan G, Lebret T, Levine L, Mulhall J, Perovic S, Ralph D, Stackl W. Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2004
  13. 110–5. [CrossRef ] 14. Gelbard MK, Hayden B. Expanding contractures of the tunica albuginea due to Peyronie’s disease with temporalis fascia free grafts. J Urol. 1991
  14. 772–6. [CrossRef ] 15. Kargi E, Yeşilli C, Hoşnuter M, Akduman B, Babuccu O, Mungan A. Relaxation incision and fascia lata grafting in the surgical correction of penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease. Plas