Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

An evaluation of transformations in financial performance measurement in terms of Turkey

Finansal performans ölçümünde dönüşümlerin Türkiye açısından değerlendirilmesi

Pages
19–46
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although it can be observed that the main trend in other developed and developing economies is on the same way, the convenience of the new paradigm and metrics especially in developing economies, in recent phase, is still in a dense argument.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Questions on how to measure financial performance, and the real indicators of correct and real financial performance, have always been an unsolved actual argument in financial economics theory and practice, though they have been discussed for centuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accounting based profit measures kept their dominance to measure financial performance for a long time.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although it can be observed that the main trend in other developed and developing economies is on the same way, the convenience of the new paradigm and metrics especially in developing economies, in recent phase, is still in a dense argument.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Questions on how to measure financial performance, and the real indicators of correct and real financial performance, have always been an unsolved actual argument in financial economics theory and practice, though they have been discussed for centuries. Accounting based profit measures kept their dominance to measure financial performance for a long time. Indeed, the shortcomings of profit maximization goal have been expressed for more than 200 years. Nevertheless, barely last 40-50 years’ fundamental developments in global economic view and studies in financial economics have transmitted the focus from profit maximization to shareholder value comprehension, or value maximization, in other words. This transformation emerged in developed Anglo-Saxon economies and has been settled there today, on a large scale. Although it can be observed that the main trend in other developed and developing economies is on the same way, the convenience of the new paradigm and metrics especially in developing economies, in recent phase, is still in a dense argument.

Özet

İşletmelerin finansal performansının nasıl ölçülmesi gerektiği, finansal performansın gerçek ve doğru göstergelerinin neler olması gerektiği, finansal ekonomi kuram ve uygulamasında asırlardır tartışılmakla birlikte halen görüş birliğine varılamamış, her zaman güncelliğini koruyan bir argüman olmuştur. Muhasebe tabanlı kâr ölçüleri, uzun süre finansal performansın ölçüsü olarak baskınlığını korumuştur. Aslında kârı ençoklamak olarak ifade edilebilecek bu amacın taşıdığı eksiklikler en azından 200 yıldır ifade edilmektedir. Ne var ki, ancak son 40-50 yılda küresel ekonomik görünümdeki köklü değişiklikler ve bunlara bağlı olarak ortaya çıkan finansal ekonomi kuramındaki gelişmeler, odağı kârı ençoklamaktan, hissedar değeri anlayışına, bir başka deyişle değer ençoklamasına kaydırmıştır. Bu dönüşüm gelişmiş Anglo-Sakson ekonomilerde başlamış ve bugün büyük ölçüde yerleşmiştir. Diğer gelişmiş ve gelişen ekonomilerde de eğilimin bu yönde olduğu gözlenmekle birlikte, özellikle gelişmekte olan ekonomiler için yeni anlayış ve ölçülerin bu aşamadaki uygunluğu halen yoğun bir şekilde tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞRUL, M. (2022). An evaluation of transformations in financial performance measurement in terms of Turkey. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 19–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/438953

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Biddle, G. ve Lindahl, F., (1982). “Stock Price Reactions to LIFO Adoptions: The Association Between Excess Returns and LIFO Tax Savings”, Journal of Accounting Research, 53, 548-551.
  2. Bruner, R.F. (2007).
  3. Case Studies in Finance, McGraw-Hill: ABD Bughin, J., Copeland, T.E. (1997). “The Virtuous Cycle of Shareholder Value Creation”, The McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 156-167
  4. Copeland, T. (1994). “Why Value Value?”, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 97-109.
  5. Copeland, T., Koller, T., ve Murrin, J. (2000).
  6. Valuation, J.Wiley:ABD Demirakos, E. G., Strong, N. C., Walker, M. (2004). “What Valuation Models Do Analysts Use?”, Accounting Horizons, 18(4), 221-240.
  7. Drucker, P.F., (1995). “The Information Executives Truly Need”, Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 54-63
  8. Ehrbar, A. (1998).
  9. EVA The Real Key to Create Value, John Wiley&Sons: ABD Ertuğrul, M., (2005). Değer Tabanlı Yönetim: Finansal Performans Ölçülerinin İMKB’de Test Edilmesi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü) Fisher, I., The Theory of Investment (1965). Augustus M. Kelley Publishers: New York (1930 tarihli orijinalinin yeniden basımı) Goedhart, M.H., Jiang, B., Koller, T. (2006). The Irrational Component of Your Stock Price, McKinsey on Finance, Yaz(20), 17-20
  10. Grant, J.L. (1996). “Foundations of EVA for Investment Managers”, Journal of Portfolio Management, Sonbahar, 41-47.
  11. Grant, J.L. (2003).
  12. Foundations of Economic Value Added, Wiley:ABD Hall, J.H. ve Brummer, L.M., (1999). “The Relationship Between The Market Value of a Company and Internal Performance Measurements”, 6th Annual Conference, Multinational Finance Society, University of Pretoria, Güney Afrika, Temmuz, 7-10.
  13. Knight, J. A. (1998).
  14. Value Based Management, ABD: McGraw Hill Koller, T. ve Peacock, J., (2002). “Time for CFOs to Step Up”, The McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 1-3
  15. Lazonick, W., ve O’Sullivan, M. (2000). “Maximizing shareholder value: a new ideology for corporate governance”, Economy and Society, 29(1), 13-35
  16. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics, MacMillan & Co.: New York Modigliani, F. ve Miller, M.H., (1958). “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment” American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297
  17. Modigliani, F. veMiller,M.H. (1961). “Divident Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares” Journal of Business, 34, 411-433.
  18. Ottoson, E. ve Weissenrieder, F. (1996). “CVA – A Framework for Value Based Management“, Ekonomi&Styrning, 5 Pereiro, L.E. (2002). Valuation of Companies in Emerging