SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Effects of environmental and organizational factors on Corporate Governance practices

Ali Ender ALTUNOĞLU
Pages
51–52
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Having investigated the relevant literature, it is concluded that there are some variables that might affect the success of implementation process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The management literature provides four different approaches to explain the relationships between groups inside a company: Shareholder Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Agency Theory, Corporate Governance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper firstly discusses the theories and subsequently focuses on corporate governance practices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Having investigated the relevant literature, it is concluded that there are some variables that might affect the success of implementation process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The management literature provides four different approaches to explain the relationships between groups inside a company: Shareholder Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Agency Theory, Corporate Governance. This paper firstly discusses the theories and subsequently focuses on corporate governance practices. Having investigated the relevant literature, it is concluded that there are some variables that might affect the success of implementation process. These internal and external variables have come together in different ways to create a range of corporate governance systems that reflect specific market structures, legal systems, traditions, regulations, and cultural and societal values. The paper focuses on the effects of corporate culture, firm size and emerging markets and crises on corporate governance practices. It argues that some relationships might exist between design variables of corporate governance application and a firm’s internal and external characteristics; there is no one “best” way to apply a corporate governance system. It is concluded that the success of corporate governance depends on the conditions under which it is employed.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTUNOĞLU, A. E. (2022). Effects of environmental and organizational factors on Corporate Governance practices. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 51–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/438869

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H. and Jackson, G. (2008). An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.
  2. Allison G.T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Misilse Crises, Boston, MA, Little Brown and Company. Berle, A. A. and Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Harcourt Brace. Berle, A.A. (1960).
  3. Power without Property, London: Sidgwick & Jackson. Blair, M.M. (1995). Ownership and Control: Rethinking Corporate Governance for the Twenty-First Century, The Brookings Institutition, Washington D.C. Blau, P.M. (1970). The Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations, American Sociological Review, 35, April, 201-218.
  4. Charron, D.C. (2007). Stockholders And Stakeholders: The Battle For Control Of The Corporation, Cato Journal, 27(1), 1-22.
  5. Coase, R.H. (1937).
  6. The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 16 (4): 387–405.
  7. Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., Ellstrand, A.E. and Johnson, J.L. (1998). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 269–290.
  8. Dalton, D.R. and Daily, C.M. (2000). The Board and Financial Performance: Bigger is Better, NACD’s Director’s Monthly, 24(8), 1–4.
  9. Davies, A. (1999). A Strategic Approach to Corporate Governance, Gower, Aldershot. Deakin, S. (2005). The Coming Transformation of Shareholder Value, Corporate Governance, 13(1), 11-18.
  10. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
  11. Dube, I. (2011). Is Corporate Governance The Answer To Corporate Structural Failure?, Us-China Law Review, 8(5), 413-430.
  12. Fama, E.F., and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
  13. Forbes, D.P. and Milliken, F.J. (1999). Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision–making Groups, Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.
  14. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston. Grant, G.H. (2003). The Evolution of Corporate Governance and its Impact on Modern Corporate America, Management Decision, 41(9), 923-934.
  15. Hofstede, G.H. (1987). The Cultural Context of Accounting, in Cushing, B. (ed.), Accounting and Culture, American Accounting Association, 1-11,
  16. Sarasota, Florida. Immergut, E. (