SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 0

Court-appointed experts in Anglo-American law

Anglo-Amerikan hukukunda mahkeme tarafından tayin edilen bilirkişiler

Barış TORAMAN
Pages
115–129
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Subsequently, we will try to evaluate the Turkish civil procedure law with regard to the explanations mentioned above.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In English and American legal systems, traditionally, the parties appoint the experts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nonetheless, both legal systems embrace the experts that are appointed by the courts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Subsequently, we will try to evaluate the Turkish civil procedure law with regard to the explanations mentioned above.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In English and American legal systems, traditionally, the parties appoint the experts. Nonetheless, both legal systems embrace the experts that are appointed by the courts. In this paper, principally, we will investigate the features of the court-appointed experts in Anglo-American legal systems. Subsequently, we will try to evaluate the Turkish civil procedure law with regard to the explanations mentioned above.

Özet

İngiliz ve Amerikan hukuklarında bilirkişiler, geleneksel olarak taraflarca tayin edilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, her iki hukuk düzeni, mahkeme tarafındantayin edilen bilirkişileri de bünyesinde barındırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, esas itibariyle, mahkeme bilirkişilerinin Anglo-Amerikan hukukundaki görünümbiçimleri üzerinde duracağız. Daha sonra ise, yaptığımız açıklamaların ışığında Türk medenî usûl hukukubakımından kısa bazı değerlendirmelerde bulunmayaçalışacağız.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORAMAN, B. (2022). Court-appointed experts in Anglo-American law. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 0, 115–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/438803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Alangoya, Y., K. Yıldırım ve N. D. Deren-Yıldırım (2011). Medenî Usul Hukuku Esasları (8. Bası). İstanbul:
  2. Beta. Andrews, N. (2012). The three paths of justice. Court proceedings, arbitration, and mediation in England. Londra: Springer. Aşçıoğlu, Ç. (2001). Bilirkişilik kavramı ve görev sınırları. Bilirkişilik sempozyumu, 9 – 10 Kasım 2001, Samsun. Ankara: Türkiye Barolar Birliği, ss. 25 – 207. Baker, W. R., (1999). L’expertise comparée. Les Etats Unis et la France. Revue Experts, 43, s. 13. Bettex, B. (2006). L’expertise judiciaire. Etude de droit fédérale et de procédure civile vaudois. Berne: Sta- empfli. Blom-Cooper, L. (2006). Assessors. Experts in the civil courts. (Ed.: L. Blom-Cooper). New York: Oxford University Press, ss. 113 – 117. Blumrosen, A., (2007). L’expertise judiciaire civile en droit américain. Conférence de consensus sur l’expertise judiciaire civile. Groupe d’analyse des textes. http://www.courdecassation.fr/IMG/File/ pdf_2007/conf_de_consensus/ bibliog raphie/consensus_blumrosen_expertise_dt_americain.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 20.7.2013).
  3. Bovey, G. (2011). Le juge face à l’expert. La preuve en droit de la responsabilité civile (Ed.: C. Chappuis ve B. Winiger). Zurich: Schulthess, ss. 95 – 116. Bronstein, D. A. (2007). Law for the expert witness. 3rd ed., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  4. Budak, A. C. (1991). Anglo-Amerikan hukukunda bilirkişilik. İBD, S. 10-12, ss. 827 – 833. Burn, S. ve Thompson, B. (2006). Single joint expert. Experts in the civil courts (Ed.: Sir L. Blom-Cooper). London: Oxford University Press, ss. 57 – 75. Caratini, M. (1984). De quelques propositions tendant à l’améliorer l’expertise judiciaire. Gaz. Pal., doctr., s. 219. Carbonnier, J. (1962). Droit civil. T. I. Introduction à l’étude du droit et droit des personnes. Paris: PUF. Castella, J. (1992). Le juge et l’expert, Modalités de leur collaboration. Mélanges en l’honneur de Louis Lombard. Genève: Sociéte de contrôle fiduciaire, ss. 9 – 20 Cecil, J. S. ve Willging, T. E. (1993). Court appointed experts: Defining the role of experts appointed under federal rule of evidence 706. Federal Judicial Center, http://earth.fjc.gov/public/pdf.nsf/ lookup/experts. pdf/$file/experts.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 20.7.2013).
  5. Cohen, M. (2008). Role of expert and guidance in civil cases in the United Kingdom. http://www.experts- institute.eu/upload/uploads/File/PDF/IE-avril08- colloqueParis-vers/2008_06_13_06 44_32_V4_Co- hen.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 20.7.2013).
  6. Demirkapı, E. (2003). Anglo-Amerikan h