Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT, FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT: AN ANALYSIS ON US AND CHINA

EKONOMİK BÜYÜME, DOĞRUDAN YABANCI SERMAYE YATIRIMLARI, FİNANSAL GELİŞME VE EKOLOJİK AYAK İZİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: ABD VE ÇİN ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Pages
366–386
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings show that the use of more environmentally friendly technologies and renewable energy sources in production will make contribute substantially to sustainable growth on a global scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the effect of economic growth, foreign direct investment, and financial development on environmental degradation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the empirical results, economic growth and financial development increase environmental degradation, while foreign direct investment contributes to environmental quality in the USA and China.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings show that the use of more environmentally friendly technologies and renewable energy sources in production will make contribute substantially to sustainable growth on a global scale.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of economic growth, foreign direct investment, and financial development on environmental degradation. For this purpose, it is examined the relationship between selected economic variables and ecological footprint in US and China, the greatest economic power among all countries, where environmental consumption is high in return for economic activities. According to the empirical results, economic growth and financial development increase environmental degradation, while foreign direct investment contributes to environmental quality in the USA and China. However, the negative impact of economic growth and the positive impact of foreign direct investment on the environment are greater in the USA than in China. The causality tests results support this relationship between economic growth and financial development and ecological footprint for the USA. The findings show that the use of more environmentally friendly technologies and renewable energy sources in production will make contribute substantially to sustainable growth on a global scale.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ekonomik büyüme, doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve finansal gelişmenin çevresel bozulmadaki etkisini belirleme amacını taşımaktadır. Bu amaçla, ekonomik faaliyetler karşılığında çevre tüketiminin yüksek olduğu, tüm ülkeler içerisinde en büyük ekonomik güce sahip olan ABD ve Çin’de seçilmiş ekonomik değişkenler ile ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Ampirik sonuçlara göre, ABD ve Çin’de ekonomik büyüme ve finansal gelişme çevresel bozulmayı artırmakta, doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları ise çevre kalitesine katkıda bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, ekonomik büyümenin çevre üzerindeki olumsuz etkisi ve doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının olumlu etkisi Çin’e göre ABD’de daha fazladır. Nedensellik test sonuçları ekonomik büyüme ve finansal gelişme ile ekolojik ayak izi arasındaki bu ilişkiyi ABD için desteklemektedir. Elde edilen bulgular, üretimde daha fazla çevre dostu teknolojileri ve yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanımının küresel boyutta sürdürülebilir büyümeye önemli katkı sağlayacağını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAKKAL, H. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH, DIRECT FOREIGN INVESTMENT, FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT: AN ANALYSIS ON US AND CHINA. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 366–386. https://ajindex.com/articles/438690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., & Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 1-12.
  2. Apaydın, Ş. (2020). Küreselleşmenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği. Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 23-42.
  3. Ansari, M., A. (2022). Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112867 Baloch, M., A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., & Iqbal, Z. (2019). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6199–6208. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9.
  4. Chang, S.C. (2015). Effects of financial developments and income on energy consumption. International Review of Economics, & Finance, 35, 28-44.
  5. Charfeddine, L. (2017). The impact of energy consumption and economic development on ecological footprint and CO2 emissions: evidence from a markov switching equilibrium correction model. Energy Economics, 65, 355-374. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009. Chowdhury, M., A., F., Shanto, P., A., Ahmed, A., & Rumana, R., H. (2021). Does foreign direct investments impair the ecological footprint? New evidence from the panel quantile regression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 4372–14385. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11518-0. CRS (Congressional Research Service). (tarihsiz) Foreign direct investment: background and issues. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/IF10636.pdf/ (Erişim tarihi: 13.04.2021).
  6. Çağlar, A., E. (2015). Yapısal kırılmalı birim kök testlerinin küçük örneklem özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Denizli: Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Çağlar, A., E., & Kubar, Y. (2017). Finansal gelişme enerji tüketimini destekler mi? Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27), 96-121.
  7. Destek, M., A., & Sarkodie, S., A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment, 650(2), 2483-2489.
  8. Dogan, E., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E., & Isik, C. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependen