SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

DISTRIBUTED VIDEO IDENTIFICATION WITH PERCEPTUAL TAGS IN PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS

Alper KOZ
Pages
132–143
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formatsand small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniformdistribution and storage load between the peers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, a distributed solution is proposed for video identification and copy detection in P2P networks, which representsa video file in the network with a set of (64-256) bits, named as perceptual tags.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Then, it presents the proposed perceptual tag extractionmethod using the temporal differences between the video frame averages and the proposed distributed searching scheme for aP2P implementation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formatsand small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniformdistribution and storage load between the peers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this paper, a distributed solution is proposed for video identification and copy detection in P2P networks, which representsa video file in the network with a set of (64-256) bits, named as perceptual tags. As such information is derived from theperceptual content of the video rather than its bitstream representation as in the case of cryptographic hashes, it provides arobust identification after the alterations in the file names and formats provided that the visual quality of the video is atacceptable levels. The paper first briefly discusses the requirements for a distributed perceptual tagging system consideringthe low computational power and low bandwidth of internet users. Then, it presents the proposed perceptual tag extractionmethod using the temporal differences between the video frame averages and the proposed distributed searching scheme for aP2P implementation. The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formatsand small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniformdistribution and storage load between the peers.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZ, A. (2022). DISTRIBUTED VIDEO IDENTIFICATION WITH PERCEPTUAL TAGS IN PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 132–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/438213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Van Trees HL. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I: Detection, Estimation, and Linear Modulation Theory. John Wiley and Sons, 1968. Blahut RE. Theory and Practice of Error Control Codes. Addison Wesley, 1983.
  2. Xinxing Z, Zhihong T, Luchen Z. A measurement Study on Mainline DHT and Magnet Link. In: IEEE International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace; 13-16 June 2016;
  3. Changsa, China. pp. 11-19,
  4. Stoica I, Morris R, Liben-Nowell D, Karger DR, Kaashoek MF, Dabek F, Balakrishnan H. Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer Lookup Protocol for Internet Applications. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking 2003; 11 (1): 17-32.
  5. Pouwelse J, Garbacki P, Wang J, Bakker A, Yang J, Losup A, Epema DHJ, Reinders M, Van Steen MR, Sips HJ. Tribler: A Social-Based Peer-to-Peer System. Journal Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2008; 20(2): 127-138.
  6. Liang J, Kumar R, Ross KW. The Kazaa Overlay: A measurement Study. Computer Networks Journal Elsevier, Special Issue on Overlays, October 2005. Shirky C. Listening to Naspter. In: Oram A, editor. Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Distruptive Technologies. Sebostopal, CA, USA: O’Reilly, 2001. pp. 21-38.
  7. Ratnasamy S, Francis P, Handley M, Karp RM, Shenker S. A scalable content-addressable network. In: Proc. of the 2001 conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications; San Diego, California, USA. pp. 161-172.
  8. Oostveen J, Kalker T, Haitsma J. Feature Extraction and a Database Strategy for Video Fingerprinting. In: VISUAL 2002, LNCS 2314. pp. 117-128.
  9. Cheung SC, Zakhor A. Estimation of web video multiplicity. In: Proc. SPIE 3964; 20 December 1999; 3964: 34-46.
  10. Hampapur A, Balle R. VideoGREP: Video Copy Detection using Inverted File Indices. Techical Report, IBM Research, 2002.
  11. Koz A, Lagendijk RL. Perceptual Tagging of Video Files in P2P Networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing; 26-29 September 2010;
  12. Hon Kong, China. pp. 193-196.
  13. Coskun B, Sankur B, Memon N. Spatio-temporal transform-based video hashing. IEEE Trans. on Multimedia 2006; 8(6): pp. 1190-1208.
  14. Zhao WL, Ngo CW. Flip-Invariant SIFT for Copy and Object Detection. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 2013; 22 (3): 980-991.
  15. Law-To J, Chen L, Joly A, Laptev I, Buisson O, Gouet-Brunet V, Boujemaa N, Stentiford F. Video Copy Detection: A Comparative Study. In: 6th ACM Conference on Image and Video Retrieval – CIVR; July 9-11 2007;
  16. Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 371-378.
  17. Koz A, Lagendijk RL. Di