Journals / Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

DISTRIBUTED VIDEO IDENTIFICATION WITH PERCEPTUAL TAGS IN PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS

Pages
132–143
Publication Date
2018-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formats and small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniform distribution and storage load between the peers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Existing methods in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks mainly use file tags or cryptographic hashes of the entire file for video searching and identification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this paper, a distributed solution is proposed for video identification and copy detection in P2P networks, which represents a video file in the network with a set of (64-256) bits, named as perceptual tags.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formats and small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniform distribution and storage load between the peers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Perceptual tags · peer to peer networks · content search

Abstract

Existing methods in Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks mainly use file tags or cryptographic hashes of the entire file for video searching and identification. These methods however become insufficient to correctly identify a video when the name and format of the files are changed. In this paper, a distributed solution is proposed for video identification and copy detection in P2P networks, which represents a video file in the network with a set of (64-256) bits, named as perceptual tags. As such information is derived from the perceptual content of the video rather than its bitstream representation as in the case of cryptographic hashes, it provides a robust identification after the alterations in the file names and formats provided that the visual quality of the video is at acceptable levels. The paper first briefly discusses the requirements for a distributed perceptual tagging system considering the low computational power and low bandwidth of internet users. Then, it presents the proposed perceptual tag extraction method using the temporal differences between the video frame averages and the proposed distributed searching scheme for a P2P implementation. The proposed extraction and searching methods provide robustness to the alterations in video formats and small additions and cuttings in the video content as the typical processing in P2P environment and also achieve uniform distribution and storage load between the peers.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOZ, A. (2018). DISTRIBUTED VIDEO IDENTIFICATION WITH PERCEPTUAL TAGS IN PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 132–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/196631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. B. Cohen, “The BitTorrent Protocol Specification”, [Online]. Available:
  2. J.A. Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D.H.J. Epema, H.J. Sips, “The Bittorrent P2P File-sharing System: Measurements and Analysis”, IPTPS'05, Feb 2005
  3. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2013-2018 (White paper). [Online]:
  4. T. Kalker, D.H.J. Epema, P.H. Hartel, R.L. Lagendijk, M. van Steen, “Music2Share—Copyright-Compliant Music Sharing in P2P Systems”, PIEEE, 92(6):961-970 (2004)
  5. D. Kundur, Z. Liu, M. Merabti, and H. Yu, “Advances in Peer-to-Peer Content Search”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo, 2007, pp. 404-407
  6. A. Jantunen, S. Peltotalo, J. Peltotalo, “Peer-to-Peer Analysis: State-of-the-art”, Tech. Rep., February 2006, Tampere University of Technology, [Online]. Available:
  7. Y. Kulbak and D. Bickson, “ The eMule Protocol Specification”, Technical Report, DANSS Lab, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Jan. 2005
  8. A.Koz and R.(Inald) L. Lagendijk, “Distributed Content Based Video Identification in P2P Networks: Requirements and Solutions”, in IEEE Trans. on Multimedia, pp.,Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 475-491, March 2017
  9. J. Law-To, L. Chen, A. Joly, I. Laptev, O. Buisson, V. Gouet-Brunet, N. Boujemaa, F. Stentiford, “Video Copy Detection: A Comparative Study”, in Proc. 6th ACM Conference on Image and Video Retrieval - CIVR, pp. 371-378, 2007
  10. W.-L. Zhao and C.-W. Ngo, “Flip-Invariant SIFT for Copy and Object Detection”, IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 22, No. 3, March 2013
  11. B. Coskun, B. Sankur, and N. Memon, “Spatio-temporal transform-based video hashing”, IEEE TMM, 8(6):1190–1208, 2006
  12. A.Koz and R.(Inald) L. Lagendijk, “Perceptual Tagging of Video Files in P2P Networks”, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Proc., pp. 193-196, Sept.2010
  13. S.-C.Cheung, A. Zakhor, “Estimation of web video multiplicity”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 3964, p. 34-46, Jan. 2000
  14. A. Hampapur and R. Balle, “VideoGREP: Video Copy Detection using Inverted File Indices”, Tech. Rep., IBM Research 2002
  15. J. Oostveen, T. Kalker, J. Haitsma, “Feature Extraction and a Database Strategy for Video Fingerprinting”, VISUAL 2002: 117-128
  16. S. Ratnasamy, P. Francis, M. Handley, R. M. Karp, S. Shenker, “A scalable content-addressabl