SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Volume: 55 Issue: 2

Effects of probiotics on in vitro ruminal profile and population of some cellulolytic bacteria

Ali ÇALIK
Gültekin YILDIZ
Hıdır GÜMÜŞ
Özge SIZMAZ
Oğuz Berk GÜNTÜRKÜN
Serdar SIZMAZ
Pages
249–255
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Total protozoa and total bacteria numbers were higher in probiotics supplemented fluid than in non-supplemented control fluid (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this studywas to evaluate the effects of probiotics on ruminal pH, ammonia nitrogen, production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and number of Ruminococcus albus andRuminococcus flavefaciens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The probiotics blend was tested in vitrofor 48 h incubation using “Hohenheim FutterwertTest” (HFT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Total protozoa and total bacteria numbers were higher in probiotics supplemented fluid than in non-supplemented control fluid (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this studywas to evaluate the effects of probiotics on ruminal pH, ammonia nitrogen, production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and number of Ruminococcus albus andRuminococcus flavefaciens. The probiotics blend was tested in vitrofor 48 h incubation using “Hohenheim FutterwertTest” (HFT). There was no interaction effect of the treatment and incubation time on the ruminal pH and ammonia-nitrogen concentration. A supplemental probiotics blend tended to increase the total SCFA concentration in comparison to the non-supplemented control fermenter fluids (P> 0.05). There was a significant interaction effect of the treatment groups and incubation time on butyrate (P=0.042), valerate (P=0.045) and isovalerate (P= 0.028) concentrations. Total protozoa and total bacteria numbers were higher in probiotics supplemented fluid than in non-supplemented control fluid (P

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIK, A., YILDIZ, G., GÜMÜŞ, H., SIZMAZ, Ö., GÜNTÜRKÜN, O. B., SIZMAZ, S. (2022). Effects of probiotics on in vitro ruminal profile and population of some cellulolytic bacteria. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 55 Issue: 2, 249–255. https://ajindex.com/articles/437740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. AOAC (2002): Official Methodsof Analysis of AOAC International, Arlington, Virginia. 2.Chaney AL, Marbach EP (1962): Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia.Clin Chem, 8, 130-132. 3.Coleman G (1988):The importance of rumen ciliate protozoa in the growth and metabolismof the host ruminant. Int J Anim Sci,3, 75-95. 4.Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H(2009): Probiotics in animal nutrition and health.Benef Microbes,1, 3-9. 5.Fuller R (1992):History and Development of Probiotics. 1-8. In: Probiotics. Springer, Netherlands. 6.Geissler C, Hoffmann M, Hickel B (1976):Gas-chromatographic estimation of volatile fatty acids. Arch Anim Nutr, 26,123-129. 7.Harmeyer J (1965): Zur methodik experimenteller untersuchungen an pansenprotozoen. Transbound Emerg Dis, 12, 841-880. 8.Horgan RP, Kenny LC (2017): Omic’technologies: genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics.Obstet Gynecol, 13, 189-195. 9.Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC, et al (2009): Rumen microbiome composition determined using two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Appl Environ Microbiol,75, 7115-7124. 10.Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, et al (2002): Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 66, 506-577. 11.Marais JP, Therion JJ, Mackie RI, et al (1988):Effect of nitrate and its reduction products on the growth and activity of the rumen microbial population.British J Nutr, 59, 301-313. 12.Martin SA, Nisbet DJ (1990): Effects of Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on fermentation of amino acids, bermudagrass and starch by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J Anim Sci, 68, 2142-2149. 13.Mathieu F, Jouany JP, Senaud J, et al (1996): The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions.Reprod Nutr Develop,36, 271-287. 14.Menke K, Steingaβ H (1986): Schätzung des energetischen futterwerts aus der in vitro mit pansensaft bestimmten gasbildung und der chemischen analyse. 1. Untersuchungen zur methode.Übers Tierernähr, 14, 251-270. 15.Morgavi DP, Kelly WJ, Janssen PH, et al(2013): Rumen microbial (meta) genomics and its application to ruminant production.Animal,7, 184-201. 16.Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, McIntosh FM (1996): Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. Br J Nutr, 76,249-261. 17.Orskov ER (1987): Protein nutrition in ruminants. Academic Press Ltd, London. 18.Paengkoum