Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2

Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa)

Ceylanlarda (Gazella subgutturosa) kafatasının üç boyutlu tomografik rekonstruksiyonu ve morfometrik analizi

Pages
161–168
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The difference in the cranial index between males and females was statistically significant (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the osteometric features of the skull by using three dimensional computedtomography images in gazelles (Gazelle subgutturosa).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Images of the skull sections of 0.625 mm thickness were acquired by using a computer tomography device with 64 detectors applying 80 kV, 200 mA and 639 mGY.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The difference in the cranial index between males and females was statistically significant (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the osteometric features of the skull by using three dimensional computedtomography images in gazelles (Gazelle subgutturosa). In the study, nine skull samples of adult gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa) were used. Images of the skull sections of 0.625 mm thickness were acquired by using a computer tomography device with 64 detectors applying 80 kV, 200 mA and 639 mGY. Three-dimensional images of the skull samples were reconstructed and morphometricmeasurements (39 linear, 1 volumetric and 1 surface area) were performed by using the software program MIMICS 12.1. Mean skull volumes in males and females were found to be 115.74±2.43 cm3 and 87.69±1.09 cm3 while the mean skull surface areas in males andfemales were 79.62±8.56 cm2 and 77.34±1.18 cm2, respectively. Significant differences between males and females for median frontal length (MFL), frontal length (FRL), upper neurocranium length (UNCL), greatest length of the lacrimal bone (GLLB), oral palatal length (OPL), length of the upper molar row (LUMR) and the greatest neurocranium breadth (GNCB) were observed. The difference in the cranial index between males and females was statistically significant (P

Özet

Bu çalışma; ceylan kafatasının bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntülerini kullanılarak kafatası kemiklerinin osteometrik özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada 9 adet erişkin ceylan (Gazella subgutturosa) kafatası kullanıldı. Kafataslarının 64 dedektörlü CT cihazı ile 80 kv, 200 MA, 639 mGY ve 0,625 mm kesit kalınlığında görüntüleri alındı. Bu görüntüler MIMICS 12.1 programı yardımıyla üç boyutlu yapıya dönüştürülerek morfometrik ölçümleri (39 linear, 1 hacim ve 1 yüzey alanı) yapıldı. Erkeklerde kafatasının ortalama hacim değeri 115,74±2,43 cm3, dişilerde 87,69±1,09 cm3 olarak tespit edilirken cranium’un ortalama yüzey alanı erkeklerde 79,62±8,56 cm2 , dişilerde 77,34±1,18 cm2 olarak bulundu. Çalışmada, median frontal uzunluk (MFL), frontal uzunluk (FRL), üst neurocranium uzunluğu (UNCL), lacrimal kemiğin maximum uzunluğu (GLLB), oral palatal uzunluk (OPL), üst molar diş sırası uzunluğu (LUMR) ve en büyük neurocranium genişliği (GNCB) parametrelerinde dişi ve erkekler arasındaki farklar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Cranial index değeri açısından dişi ve erkekler arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (P

🔖

Cite This Article

BOZKAYA, F., İNCE, N. G., YILMAZ, B., DEMİRCİOĞLU, İ. (2022). Three-dimensional tomographic reconstruction and morphometric analysis of skull in gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa). Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2, 161–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/437549

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Bärmann EV, Wronski T, Lerp H, et al (2013): Morphometric and genetic framework for Gazella. Zoo J Linnean Soc, 169, 673-696
  2. Best KC, Garvin HM, Cabo LL (2018): An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci, 63, 990-1000
  3. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, et al (1982): Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 138, 329-333
  4. Chanpanitkitchote P, Tangphokhanon W, Nomsiri R, et al (2015): Ratio of cranial and skull volumes in 25 mammalian species. Vet Integr Sci, 13, 165-177
  5. Christiansen P, Harris JM (2012): Variation in craniomandibular morphology and sexual dimorphism in Pantherines and the Sabercat Smilodon fatalis. PLoS One, 7, e48352
  6. Fandos P, Vigal CR (1993): Sexual dimorphism in size of the skull of Spanish ibex Capra pyrenaica. Acta Theriol, 33,103-111
  7. Groves CP (1983): Notes on the gazelles IV: the Arabian gazelles collected by Hemprich and Ehrenberg. Z Saugetierkd, 48, 371–381
  8. Hasan HA (2017): Three dimensional computed tomography morphometric analysis of the orbit in Iraqi population. Int Med J, 24, 147-149
  9. Hayatgheib D, Karami M, Farahmand H, et al (2011): Morphological study and comparison of western and eastern goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa: Guldenstaedt, 1780) populations in Iran. Int J Environ Res, 5, 225-232
  10. Ince NG, Demircioglu I, Yılmaz B, et al (2018): Martılarda (Laridae spp.) cranium’un üç boyutlu modellemesi. Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg, 7, 98-101
  11. Jaslow JR (1989): Sexual dimorphism of cranial suture complexity in wild sheep (Ovis orientalis). Zoo J Linnean Soc, 95, 273-284
  12. Kamal S (2006): Morphological and craniometrical studies on the skull of Kagani goat (Capra hircus) of Jammu region. Int J Morphol, 24, 449-455
  13. Kanchan T, Krishan K, Gupta A, et al (2014): A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population. J Craniofac Surg, 25, 1645-1649
  14. Karimi I, Onar V, Pazvan G, et al (2011): The cranial morphometric and morphologic characteristics of Mehraban sheep in Western Iran. Glob Vet, 6, 111-117
  15. Kataba A (2010): Biometric and morphologic characteristics of the skull of the Gwembe Valley Dwarf Goat (Capra Hircus) breed of Zambia. MSc, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia
  16. Kranioti EF (2019): Radiometry versus osteometry in sex assessment: a study of the Cretan radius. Aust J Forensic Sci, 51, 135-148
  17. Krupa P, Krsek P, Cernochova P, et al (2