Journals / Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2

The effects of fumaric and malic acids on the in vitro true digestibility of some alternative feedstuffs for ruminants

Ruminantlar için fumarik ve malik asitlerin bazı alternatif yem maddelerinin in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirliği üzerine etkiler

Pages
185–192
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Fumaric acid significantly reduced (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the addition of different amounts of fumaric acid (FA) and malicacid (MA) to the leaves of Robinia pseudoacacia (Black locust, acacia), Prunus laurocerasus (cherry laurel), Quercus cerris (oak), and Camellia sinensis (tea factory wastes, TFW), to improve their value as alternative feeds for ruminants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Organic acids were not added in the control group and 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3% FA or MA were added to the experimental groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Fumaric acid significantly reduced (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the addition of different amounts of fumaric acid (FA) and malicacid (MA) to the leaves of Robinia pseudoacacia (Black locust, acacia), Prunus laurocerasus (cherry laurel), Quercus cerris (oak), and Camellia sinensis (tea factory wastes, TFW), to improve their value as alternative feeds for ruminants. The parameters examined were the in vitro true digestibility of feed (IVTDAs fed), dry matter (IVTDDM), organic matter (IVTDOM), neutral detergent fiber (IVTDNDF) and count of protozoans. The digestibility experiments were performed with a DAISY incubator system. Organic acids were not added in the control group and 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3% FA or MA were added to the experimental groups. Each treatment was replicated 6 times. Samples were incubated for 48 hours. Fumaric acid significantly reduced (P

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı farklı düzeylerdeki fumaric (FA) ve malik (FA) asitin ruminant alternatif yem kaynağı olarak Robinia pseudoacacia (yalancı akasya), Prunus laurocerasus (karayemiş), Quercus cerris (meşe), ve Camellia sinensis (fabrika atığı, TFW) yapraklarının sindirilebilirlik değerleri üzerine olan etkilerini incelemektir. Araştırmada materyallerin yem bazında (IVTDAs fed), kuru madde bazında (IVTDDM), organic maddede (IVTDOM), nötral deterjen fiber (IVTDNDF) in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlikleri ve protozoa sayıları parametreleri üzerine çalışılmıştır. Sindirilebilirlik parametreleri DAISY inkübatör sistemi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kontrol grubuna FA ve MA eklenmezken deneme grupları ayrı ayrı ve sırasıyla %0,1, %0,2, %0,3 FA ve MA içerecek şekilde düzenlenmiştir. Her örnek 6 kez tekrarlı olacak şekilde araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. Örnekler 48 saat inkubasyona tabi tutulmuştur. Fumarik asit R. pseudoacacia yapraklarında tüm sindirilebilirlik değerlerini önemli (P

🔖

Cite This Article

SALMAN, M., KAYA, İ., GENÇ, B., BÖLÜKBAŞ, B., AÇICI, M. (2022). The effects of fumaric and malic acids on the in vitro true digestibility of some alternative feedstuffs for ruminants. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 67 - Sayı: 2, 185–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/437307

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. ANKOM (2002): Operator’s manual. Ankom 200/220 fiberanalyzer. Ankom Technology Corporation, Fairport
  2. AOAC (2006): Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Arlington, VA
  3. Asanuma N, Hino T (2000): Activity and properties of fumarate reductase in ruminal bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol, 46, 119–125
  4. Bharathidhasan A, Karunakaran A, Pugazhenthi TR, et al (2016): The effect of supplemental organic acid on methane reduction to decrease the global warming from dairy cattle. IJACSA, 3, 4
  5. British Columbia Ministry of Forests (1996): Collection of Specimens. p.2-5. In: Techniques and procedures for collecting, preserving, processing, and storing botanical specimens. Res. Br., B.C. Min. For., Victoria, British Columbia
  6. Burner DM, Carrier DJ, Belesky DP et al (2008): Yield components and nutritive value of Robinia pseudoacacia and Albizia julibrissin in Arkansas. Agroforest Syst, 72, 51- 62
  7. Callaway TR, Martin SA (1997): Effects of cellobiose and monensin on in vitro fermentation of organic acids by mixed ruminal bacteria. J Dairy Sci, 80, 1126–1135
  8. Canbolat O, Kamalak A, Özköse E, et al (2005): Effect of polyethylene glycol on in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility of Quercus cerris leaves. LRRD, 17, 4
  9. Carro MD, Ranilla MJ (2003): Effect of the addition of malate on in vitro rumen fermentation of cereal grains. Brit J Nutr, 89, 181–188
  10. Castillo C, Benedito JL, Méndez J, et al (2004): Organic acids as a substitute for monensin in diets for beef cattle.Anim Feed Sci Tech, 115, 101–116
  11. Chen Y, Zhao Y, Fu ZY et al (2011): Chemical composition and in vitro ruminal fermentation characteristics of tetraploid black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.). Asian J Anim Vet Adv, 7, 706-714 12. Ebrahimi SH, Datta MM, Heidarian V, et al (2015): Effects of fumaric or malic acid and 9,10 anthraquinone on digestiblity, micobial protein synthesis, methane emission and performance of growing calves. Indian J Anim Sci, 85, 1000-1005
  12. Gill JL (1978): Design and analysis of experiments in the animal and medical sciences. Vol 1. The Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa, USA
  13. Kara K (2015): In vitro methane production and quality of corn silage treated with maleic acid. Ital J Anim Sci, 14, 3994
  14. Kaya E, Kamalak A (2012): Potential nutritive value and condensed tannin contents of acorns from different oak species. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak, 18, 1061-1066 16. Kh