SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Turkey's EU accession process in the context of principles of the European administrative space

Avrupa idari alanı ilkeleri bağlamında Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği adaylık süreci

Fatih DEMİR
Pages
79–100
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper, argues that public administration in Europe has been restructured under the principles of transparency, efficiency, participation and accountability, and that these principles have affected Turkish public administration reform conducted in Turkey's EU accession process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper analyzes the transformation in Turkish administrative structures in the context of the concepts and principles that constitutes the content of the European Administrative Space (EAS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Basic approaches and principles for public administration shared by the EU member countries constitute the foundation of enlargement negotiations with candidate members in the process of transition from a 15-member EU to 27-member EU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper, argues that public administration in Europe has been restructured under the principles of transparency, efficiency, participation and accountability, and that these principles have affected Turkish public administration reform conducted in Turkey's EU accession process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper analyzes the transformation in Turkish administrative structures in the context of the concepts and principles that constitutes the content of the European Administrative Space (EAS). The EAS is a structure built on shared principles of public administration in the European Union. Basic approaches and principles for public administration shared by the EU member countries constitute the foundation of enlargement negotiations with candidate members in the process of transition from a 15-member EU to 27-member EU. Adaptation to the acquis communitaire, a precondition for EU membership, requires comprehensive public administration reforms consistent with the EAS principles. This paper, argues that public administration in Europe has been restructured under the principles of transparency, efficiency, participation and accountability, and that these principles have affected Turkish public administration reform conducted in Turkey's EU accession process.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Avrupa idari Alanı'mn (EAS) içini dolduran kavramlar ve ilkeler bağlamında Türkiye 'nin idari yapısında yaşanan dönüşüm ele alınmıştır. EAS, Avrupa Birliğinde kamu yönetiminin paylaşılan ilkeleri üzerinde oluşmakta olan bir yapıdır. Avrupa Birliğinin kamu yönetimiyle ilgili temel yaklaşımları ve ilkeleri, 15 üyeli bir Avrupa Birliğinden 27 üyeli bir Avrupa Birliğine geçiş sürecinde aday ülkelerle yürütülen müzakerelerin temel noktasını oluşturmuştur. Üyelik için şart olan müktesebata uyum, aday ülkelerin kamu yönetimlerinde EAS ilkelerine uygun, kapsamlı reformlar yapılmasını gerektirmiştir. Çalışma, AB 'de kamu yönetiminin açıklık, etkenlik, katılımcılık ve hesap verebilirlik ilkeleri çerçevesinde yeniden yapılandığını ve bu ilkelerin Türkiye 'nin adaylık sürecinde yaşanan kamu yönetimi reformunu doğrudan etkilediğini savunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, F. (2022). Turkey's EU accession process in the context of principles of the European administrative space. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 79–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/435480

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arap, İbrahim - Levent Yılmaz (2005), "Yeni Kavramlarla Yeni Yönetim Modeli: Kamu Görevlileri Etik Kurulu", Siyasette, ve Yönetimde Etik Sempozyumu, Sakarya, s. 251-268.
  2. Bailey, David J. (2006), "Governance or the Crisis of Governmentality? Applying Critical State Theory at the European Level", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 13,No:l January,p. 16-33.
  3. Balcı, Asım (2004), "Türk Kamu Yönetimi Sisteminin AB Normlarına Uyumlaştırılması, Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türkiye: Siyasal, Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Dönüşüm", Turgay Uzun - Serap Özen (Ed.), Sorunlar ve Tartışmalar, Seçkin Yayınları, Ankara, s. 113-127.
  4. Bovens, Mark (2006), "Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability: a Conceptual Framework", European Governance Papers, C-06-01, 16 January 2006.
  5. Costa, Olivier - Nicolas Jabko - Christian Lequesne - Paul Magnette (2003), "Introduction: Diffuse control mechanisms in the European Union: towards a new democracy?", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol.10, No: 5, October, p. 666-676.
  6. Curtin, Deidre M. - Ige F. Dekker (2002), "Governance as a legal concept within the European Union; purposes and principles", International Law Forum 4, p. 134-148.
  7. Cygan, Adam (2003), "Legislation, Democracy "Accountability in the European Union - The View from the House of Commons, Modern Law Review Limited, p. 384-401.
  8. Dirsek, Hüseyin (2007),
  9. Yerel Yönetimler ve İnovasyon, Türk İdare Dergisi, Sayı 457, Ankara, s. 141-148.
  10. Eberlein, Burkard - Edgar Grande (2005), "Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state", Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No: 1, February, p. 89-112.
  11. Eryılmaz, Bilal (2006),
  12. Kamu Yönetimi, Erkam Matbaası, İstanbul. European Commission (2000a), "Regular Report from the Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession", 8 November 2000. European Commission (2002b), "Regular Report from the Commission on Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession", SEC(2002)1402, 9.10.2002,
  13. Brussels. Giorgi, Liana - Ronald Pohoryles (2005), "Challenges To EU Political Integration And The Role Of Democratization, Innovation", The European Journal Of Social Sciences, December, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p. 407-418.
  14. Granbech-Jensen, C. (1998), "The Scandinavian tradition of open government and the European Union: problems of compatibility?", Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 5, No: 1, p. 185-99.
  15. Guggenbuhl, A. (1998), "A Miracle Formula or an Old Powder in a New Packaging? Transparency and Openness after Amsterdam", V. Deckmyn -1. Th