SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Meta-Governance: The Effective and Democratic Administration in the Face of Complexity

Sevinç SOYOCAK ÖZALP
Pages
61–90
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study aims to clarify the concept and practice of meta governance by focusing on the potential role of meta-governance in effective and democratic admin-istration in the face of accepted complexity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As a result of the reforms that started in the field of public administration in the 1980s, governance theory came to agenda in the 1990s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the 2000s, it is seen that the concept of meta-governance has been discussed as a solution in the literature against to the administrative problems that arise because of these different actors (state / government, private sector, non-governmental organizations, citizens, etc.) and to increasing complexity of their interactions that in-volved in the process of formulation and implementation of public policies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study aims to clarify the concept and practice of meta governance by focusing on the potential role of meta-governance in effective and democratic admin-istration in the face of accepted complexity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

As a result of the reforms that started in the field of public administration in the 1980s, governance theory came to agenda in the 1990s. The process which continued with governance theory and practices changed the role and jurisdiction of the central state and resulted in the strengthening of different market and network based actors, oth-ers than the state. With the 2000s, it is seen that the concept of meta-governance has been discussed as a solution in the literature against to the administrative problems that arise because of these different actors (state / government, private sector, non-governmental organizations, citizens, etc.) and to increasing complexity of their interactions that in-volved in the process of formulation and implementation of public policies. In this context, “meta-governance”, which is relatively less studied in the Turkish literature, is the sub-ject of this study. The study aims to clarify the concept and practice of meta governance by focusing on the potential role of meta-governance in effective and democratic admin-istration in the face of accepted complexity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZALP, S. S. (2022). Meta-Governance: The Effective and Democratic Administration in the Face of Complexity. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 61–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/435450

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bayraktar, F. (2015). “Yönetişim Paradigması ve Neoliberalizm: Çelişki ve Kopuş mu Uyum ve Süreklilik mi?”. Ardahan İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 71-94.
  2. Bailey, D. ve M. Wood (2017). “The Metagovernance of English Devolution”. Local Government Studies, 43(6), 966-991.
  3. Beishem, M. ve N. Simon (2015). “Meta-Governance of Partnerships for Sustainable Development. Actors’ Perspectives on How the UN Could Improve Partnerships’ Governance Services in Areas of Limited Statehood”. SFB-Governance Working Paper Series, No: 68, August. Bogason, P. ve J. A. Musso (2006). “The Democratic Prospects of Network Governance”. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3-18. Capano,G., M. Howlett ve M. Ramesh (2015). “Bringing Governments Back in: Governance and Governing in Comparative Policy Analysis”. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 17(4), 311-321.
  4. Christensen, T. ve P. Laegreid. (2007). “ The Whole-of-Government Approach to Public Sector Reforms”. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
  5. Christensen, T. ve P. Laegreid (2010). “Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration-Theoretical and Empirical Challenges”. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407-423.
  6. Christopoulos, S., B. Horvath ve M. Kull (2012). “Advancıng the Governance of Cross-Sectoral Polıcıes For Sustaınable Development: A Metagovernance Perspectıve”. Public Administration and Development, (32), 305-323.
  7. Çolak, Ç. D. (2019). “XI. Kalkınma Planında Yeni Kamu Yönetişimi Paradigmasından İzler”. Ombudsman Akademik, 6(11). 39-71.
  8. Erkoçak, E. ve Ş. N. Açıkalın (2014). Complexity Theory In Public Administration and Meta-governance, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286930194 (27.09.2021).
  9. Genç, N. (2015). Yeni Kamu Hizmeti: Vatandaş ve Kamu Yararı Temelinde Kamu Hizmetini Yeniden Düşünmek. Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği ve Ötesi. (Ed. Ö. Köseoğlu ve M. Z. Sobacı). Bursa: Dora Yayıncılık. Gjaltema, J., R. Biesbroek ve K. Termeer (2019). “From government to governance…to meta-governance: a systematic literature review”. Public Management Review, 22(3), 1-21.
  10. Hertting, N. (2007). Mechanisms of Governance Network Formation – A Contextual Rational Choice Perspective. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. (Ed. E. Sørensen ve J. Torfing). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kaban, Z. Y. (1994). “Genel Sistem Teorisi ve Sibernetik”. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 8, 219-226.
  11. Katsamunska, P. (2016). “The Concept of Governance and Public Governance T