Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW FOR THE ANTECEDENTS OF COLLECTIVE GUILT: DOES TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY EXPLAIN THE RARITY OF COLLECTIVE GUILT?

KOLEKTİF SUÇLULUĞUN ÖNCÜLLERİNE TARİHSEL BİR BAKIŞ: DEHŞET YÖNETİMİ KURAMI KOLEKTİF SUÇLULUĞUN AZ RASTLANIR OLMASINA BİR AÇIKLAMA GETİREBİLİR Mİ?

Pages
164–191
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, another concern of this study is to use terror management theory in order to provide reasons for why this emotion can be rare.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Collective guilt is a relatively new concept studied in intergroup relations in social psychology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Collective guilt suggests a new way of studying positive intergroup relations; thus, investigation of the factors underlying collective guilt seems more essential.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, another concern of this study is to use terror management theory in order to provide reasons for why this emotion can be rare.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Collective guilt is a relatively new concept studied in intergroup relations in social psychology. Collective guilt suggests a new way of studying positive intergroup relations; thus, investigation of the factors underlying collective guilt seems more essential. Starting from this point of view, the purpose of this study is to look at the antecedents of collective guilt by considering its historical development. Since collective guilt is an aversive emotion, people are prone to reject it. That is why it is a rare emotion. Therefore, another concern of this study is to use terror management theory in order to provide reasons for why this emotion can be rare.

Özet

Sosyal psikoloji yazını, gruplararası ilişkiler bağlamında ele alınacak görece yeni bir konsept ileri sürmektedir: Kolektif suçluluk. Kolektif suçluluk hissetmek, gruplararası ilişkilerin iyileşmesine ışık tutabilecek sonuçlara sahiptir. Bu sebeple kolektif suçluluk hissetmenin altında yatan etmenleri incelemek, anlamak, araştırmak ve öneriler sunmak önemlidir. Bu noktadan hareketle, bu derleme makalesiyle kolektif suçluluğun öncüllerini tarihsel bir bakış açısıyla ele almak amaçlanmaktadır. Kolektif suçluluğun öncülleri, bu konunun çalışılmaya başlandığı ilk yıllardan başlayarak son zamanlarda elde edilen bulgularla birlikte ele alınarak kapsayıcı bir yazı sunulması hedeflenmektedir. Ek olarak, yazının son kısmında yine bir gruplararası ilişkiler teorisi olan dehşet yönetimi teorisinden yararlanılarak kolektif suçluluğun az hissedilmesine dair açıklamalar getirilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇUVAŞ, B. (2022). A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW FOR THE ANTECEDENTS OF COLLECTIVE GUILT: DOES TERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY EXPLAIN THE RARITY OF COLLECTIVE GUILT?. Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 164–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/435281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Baumeister, Roy F., Arlene M. Stillwell and Todd F. Heatherton (1994), “Guilt: An interpersonal approach”, Psychological Bulletin, 115 (2): 243–267.
  2. Baumeister, Roy F., Kathleen D. Vohs, C. Nathan DeWall and Liqing Zhang, (2007), “How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11 (2): 167–203.
  3. Behrendt, Hadar and Rachel Ben-Ari (2012), “The positive side of negative emotion: The role of guilt and shame in coping with interpersonal conflict”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56 (6): 1116-1138.
  4. Bilali, Rezarta, Linda R. Tropp and Nilanjana Dasgupta (2012), “Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence”, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18: 21-39.
  5. Boeckmann, Robert J. and N. T. Feather (2007), “Gender, discrimination beliefs, group-based guilt, and responses to affirmative action for Australian women”, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31 (3): 290–304.
  6. Branscombe, Nyla R. (2004), “A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt”, Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (New York: Cambridge University Press): 320-334.
  7. Branscombe, N. R., Ben Slugoski and Diane M. Kappen (2004), “The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not”, N. R. Branscombe and B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (New York: Cambridge University Press): 16-34.
  8. Burke, Brian L., Andy Martens and Erik H. Faucher (2010), “Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (2): 155-195.
  9. Castano, Emanuele (2004), “In case of death, cling to the ingroup”, European Journal of Social Psychology, 34: 375-384.
  10. Castano, Emanuele and Roger Giner-Sorolla (2006), “Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (5): 804-818.
  11. Castano, Emanuele, Vincent Yzerbyt, Maria-Paola Paladino and Simona Sacchi (2002), “I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28 (2): 135-143. Čehajić-Clancy, Sabina and Rupert Brown (2014), ““The burden of our times”: Antecedents of group-based guilt and shame”, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20 (2): 166-170.
  12. Cehajic-Clancy, Sabina, Dan