Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version ofthe COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index

Pages
237–243
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CPDI is valid and reliable, and can be used in stud ies evaluating the COVID-19 peritraumatic stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, affecting people world wide, negatively affects the mental health of people.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During this situation, accurate andreliable tools are needed to evaluate mental state.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CPDI is valid and reliable, and can be used in stud ies evaluating the COVID-19 peritraumatic stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, affecting people world wide, negatively affects the mental health of people. During this situation, accurate andreliable tools are needed to evaluate mental state. The aim of this study was to translatethe COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index (CPDI) into Turkish, and analyze it for validityand reliability. Methods: The original form of the CPDI was translated into Turkish using the back transla tion method. It was then applied to over 400 individuals, randomly selected from patientsand their relatives, between the ages of 18 and 70, who presented to the outpatient clinicsof Mustafa Kemal University Research Hospital. Data were collected with a demographicdata form. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were done. Construct validity,item content validity index, and content validity were analyzed. Cronbach’s alpha vs.Spearman-Brown reliability analyses were done. Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the CPDI was found to be 0.842, which is quite high.Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the subscales ranged from 0.670 to 0.780. The Spearman Brown reliability coefficient was 0.730. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed goodfit indices (χ2 /df=1.94; root mean square error of approximation=0.05; Comparative FitIndex=0.93; Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis Index=0.91). The meantotal score was 27.26 (SD=12.28), while the mean subscale scores ranged from 4.83 to10.26. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the CPDI is valid and reliable, and can be used in stud ies evaluating the COVID-19 peritraumatic stress.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAĞ, M., KOKAÇYA, M. H. (2022). Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version ofthe COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 237–243. https://ajindex.com/articles/435226

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard Available at: https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed on April 11, 2021
  2. Turkey Covid-19 patient chart. Available at: https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/ Accessed on April 11, 2021
  3. Satici B, Gocet-Tekin E, Deniz ME, Satici SA. Adaptation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale: its association with psychological distress and life satisfaction in Turkey. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020;1:1-9. [CrossRef] 4. Acarli ANÖ, Samanci B, Ekizoğlu E, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from the point of view of neurologists: observation of neurological findings and symptoms during the combat against a pandemic. Arch Neuropsychiatry. 2020;57(2):154-159
  4. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(3):228- 229. [CrossRef] 6. Pakpour AH, Griffiths MD. The fear of COVID-19 and its role in preventive behaviors. J Concurrent Disord. 2020;2(1):58-63
  5. Ahorsu DK, Lin CY, Imani V, et al. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020:1-9. [CrossRef] 8. Karaşar B, Canlı D. Psychological resilience and depression during the Covid-19 pandemic in Turkey. Psychiatr Danub. 2020;32(2):273-279. [CrossRef] 9. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(3):e203976. [CrossRef] 10. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, et al. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatr. 2020;33(2):e100213. [CrossRef] 11. Rossi R, Socci V, Talevi D, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures impact on mental health among the general population in Italy. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:790. [CrossRef] 12. Costantini A, Mazzotti E. Italian validation of CoViD-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index and preliminary data in a sample of general population. Riv psichiatr. 2020;55(3):145-151. [CrossRef] 13. Bovin MJ, Marx BP. The importance of the peritraumatic experience in defining traumatic stress. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(1):47-67. [CrossRef] 14. Sullivan LM. Power and sample size determination. In: Riegelman R, ed. Essentials of Biostatistics in Public Health. Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2008
  6. Petrozzi BP, Arevalo-Flores M, Krüger-Malpartida H, et al. Translation, adaptation and expert validation t