Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Attachment, Psychological Wellbeing, andEducational Development among Child Members ofTransnational Families

Pages
49–55
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study reveals that a child’s age at the parent’s departure, family cohesion, and economic security are integral to ensuring the wellbeing of children in transnational family arrangements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The current research investigated attachment styles, psychological wellbeing, and academic development among children in transnational family arrangements in Zim-babwe.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Purposive sampling was employed to select 57 children in transnational family arrangements and 41 children in conventional two-parent households aged between 8 and 14 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study reveals that a child’s age at the parent’s departure, family cohesion, and economic security are integral to ensuring the wellbeing of children in transnational family arrangements.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The current research investigated attachment styles, psychological wellbeing, and academic development among children in transnational family arrangements in Zim-babwe. Methods: Purposive sampling was employed to select 57 children in transnational family arrangements and 41 children in conventional two-parent households aged between 8 and 14 years. Attachment Style Classification Questionnaire for latency-age children, Stir-ling Children’s Well-being Scale, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and Question-naire for Evaluation of Development and Behavior were applied. Results: The results revealed that there were no significant differences in attachment styles, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and academic development between the trans-national and conventional family groups. Social desirability and prosocial behavior were significantly lower in the transnational group. Children with both parents as migrants had significantly lower scores for psychological wellbeing and higher scores for emotional symptoms and literacy problems than children with one migrant parent or conventional families. Conclusion: There was no difference in attachment styles and academic development, which may be a reflection of the strength of the extended family in substituting parental care. However, children in transnational family arrangements scored poorly on the proso-cial subscale of psychological wellbeing, which is associated with family cohesion. Paren-tal migration negatively impacts family cohesion, especially when both parents migrate. When both parents migrate, the children exhibited emotional symptoms, literacy prob-lems, poor prosocial behaviors, and poor psychological wellbeing because children re-ceive reduced social support. This study reveals that a child’s age at the parent’s departure, family cohesion, and economic security are integral to ensuring the wellbeing of children in transnational family arrangements.

🔖

Cite This Article

KİRAZ, A., ÇAKICI, E., ÇERKEZ, Y., MANYERUKE, G. (2022). Attachment, Psychological Wellbeing, andEducational Development among Child Members ofTransnational Families. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 49–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/435213

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Child Welfare Information Gateway. Child maltreatment prevention: Past, present, and future. US Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau 2017. Accessed January, 2020.
  2. Family. Merriam-Webster Dictionary; 2018. Accessed February, 2020.
  3. Mazzucato V, Schans D. Transnational families and the well-being of children: conceptual and methodological challenges. J Marriage Fam. 2011;73(4):704-712. [Crossref] 4. McCarthy JR, Edwards R. Key Concepts in Family Studies. Sage Publication; 2011
  4. Mazzucato V, Schans D. Transnational families children and migration-development nexus. Paper No. 20 presented at SSCR Migration and Development Conference; February 28- March 1, 2008; New York, USA
  5. Schmalzbauer L. Family divided: the class formation of Honduran transnational families. Global Networks. 2008;8(3):329-346. [Crossref] 7. Mandivengerei P. Zimbabwe: 12,5 percent zim children have diaspora parent. AllAfrica; 2019. Accessed February, 2020. https://allafrica.com/ stories/201912130109.html
  6. Tevera D, Zinyama L. Zimbabweans who move: perspectives on international migration in Zimbabwe. SAMP Migration Policy Series No. 25; 2002
  7. Finzi-Dottan R. Attachment style classification questionnaire for latency age children. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science; 2012. Accessed February, 2020. https://www.midss.org/sites/default/ files/ascq-eng-my.pdf
  8. Obikoya OG, Awujo CG. Family attachment patterns and school adjustment of secondary school adolescents in rivers state. EJEDP. 2017;5(3):39- 53
  9. Liddle I, Carter GFA. Emotional and psychological well-being in children: the development and validation of the Stirling Children’s Well-being Scale. Educational Psychology in Practice. 2015;031(2):174- 185. [Crossref] 12. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire a research note. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38:581-586. [Crossref] 13. Mazzucato V, Cebotari V, Veale A, et al. International parental migration and the psychological well-being of children in Ghana, Nigeria, and Angola. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:215-224. [Crossref] 14. Kadesjo B, Janols LO, Korkman M, et al. Five-to-Fifteen-Revised (5-15R). 2017. Accessed March, 2020. www.5-15.org
  10. Zhao C, Wang F, Zhou X, et al. Impact of parental migration on psychosocial well-being of children left behind: a qualitative study in rural China. Int J Equity Health