Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of theBrief Irritability Test

Pages
318–323
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study reveals that the Turkish form of the BITe shows sufficient psycho metric properties in the non-clinical population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Although irritability is a widely used term, it has no universal definition.Irritability is an emotional process that can be defined by a tendency to negative emo tional states.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consequently, this paper aims to conduct a validity and reliability study of theTurkish version of the Brief Irritability Test (BITe) with 5 items, which was developed byHoltzman et al. in 2015 to measure irritability rapidly and appropriately.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study reveals that the Turkish form of the BITe shows sufficient psycho metric properties in the non-clinical population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Although irritability is a widely used term, it has no universal definition.Irritability is an emotional process that can be defined by a tendency to negative emo tional states. No Turkish scale has been developed or adapted to measure irritability inadults. Consequently, this paper aims to conduct a validity and reliability study of theTurkish version of the Brief Irritability Test (BITe) with 5 items, which was developed byHoltzman et al. in 2015 to measure irritability rapidly and appropriately. Methods: The Turkish BITe’s internal consistency and validity analysis were studied on136 volunteering undergraduate and postgraduate students. Cronbach’s alpha value wascalculated for internal consistency. Concurrent, convergent, discriminant validity analy ses, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to calculate structural validity.Moreover, the scale was applied to 24 people 2 weeks later to determine the temporalreliability of the Turkish BITe. Results: When the fit indices of the scale related to the CFA were examined, it wasobserved that it had a good fit (χ2=7.517, χ2 /df=1.503, df=5; RMSEA=0.061; CFI=0.992,GFI=0.977, NFI=0.976; TLI=0.984, IFI=0.992). In the reliability analysis, the Cronbach'salpha value was 0.86, and the correlation coefficient between test–retest scores was 0.74(P < .001). Conclusion: This study reveals that the Turkish form of the BITe shows sufficient psycho metric properties in the non-clinical population.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİFTECİ, K., KARATEPE, H. T., KARADERE, M. E., ELBAY, R. Y., YILMAZ, H. (2022). The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of theBrief Irritability Test. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 6, 318–323. https://ajindex.com/articles/435204

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Snaith RP, Taylor CM. Irritability definition, assessment and associated factors. Br J Psychiatry. 1985;147:127-136. [CrossRef] 2. Malhi G, Bell E, Outhred T. Getting irritable about irritability? Evid Based Ment Health. 2019;22(3):93-94. [CrossRef] 3. Caprara GV, Cinanni V, D’imperio G, et al. Indicators of impulsive aggression: present status of research on irritability and emotional susceptibility scales. Pers Individ Dif. 1985;6(6):665-674. [CrossRef] 4. Barata PC, Holtzman S, Cunningham S, O’Connor BP, Stewart DE. Building a definition of irritability from academic definitions and lay descriptions. Emot Rev. 2016;8(2):164-172. [CrossRef] 5. Mangelli L, Fava GA, Grassi L, et al. Irritable mood in Italian patients with medical disease. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006;194(3):226-228. [CrossRef] 6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Virginia: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [CrossRef] 7. Perlis RH, Fraguas R, Fava M, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of irritability in major depressive disorder: a preliminary report from the sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66(2):159-66; quiz 147, 273. [CrossRef] 8. Perlis RH, Fava M, Trivedi MH, et al. Irritability is associated with anxiety and greater severity, but not bipolar spectrum features, in major depressive disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009;119(4):282-289. [CrossRef] 9. Stringaris A, Cohen P, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Adult outcomes of youth irritability: a 20-year prospective community-based study. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(9):1048-1054. [CrossRef] 10. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1996. 11. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133(11):429-435. [CrossRef] 12. Craig KJ, Hietanen H, Markova IS, Berrios GE. The irritability questionnaire: a new scale for the measurement of irritability. Psychiatry Res. 2008;159(3):367-375. [CrossRef] 13. Stringaris A, Goodman R, Ferdinando S, et al. The affective reactivity index: a concise irritability scale for clinical and research settings. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53(11):1109-1117. [CrossRef] 14. Holtzman S, O’Connor BP, Barata PC, Stewart DE. The brief irritability test (BITe): a measure of irritability for use among men and women. Assessment. 2015;22(1):101-115. [C