Journals / Alpha psychiatry (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Dissociation Across Cultures: A Transdiagnostic Guide for Clinical Assessment and Management

Pages
95–103
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Namely, universal medical-psychiatric categories are conceived as tools of communication and mutual understanding rather than being mere appearances or primary disturbances.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The clinical heterogeneity of dissociation constitutes a challenge to the culture-sensitive clinician.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given that culture influences communication between clinician and patient, accurate expression of mental content requires the idiomatic armamentarium describing the experience.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Namely, universal medical-psychiatric categories are conceived as tools of communication and mutual understanding rather than being mere appearances or primary disturbances.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The clinical heterogeneity of dissociation constitutes a challenge to the culture-sensitive clinician. Variability in experiencing dissociation, the interplay between acute and chronic conditions, and the predominance of a nosologically interface-type of clinical surface conceal core dissociative symptoms. While the latter (amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, identity confusion, and identity alteration) usually remain underreported, the clinical surface may be dominated by acute (functional neurological symptoms, brief psychosis, an experience of possession, or acute dissociative reaction to a stressful event) or chronic (mood and personality disorders) secondary syndromes. However, these syndromes also constitute gateways in pursuing the clues of core dissociation. Given that culture influences communication between clinician and patient, accurate expression of mental content requires the idiomatic armamentarium describing the experience. The latter is problematic in dealing with phenomena of core dissociation while the secondary representations have a relatively universal character for both clinicians and patients. Nevertheless, this approach requires a transdiagnostic understanding in conceiving this clinical interface. This interface reflects, in fact, complications of dissociative disorders which require to be addressed in the first line. This is either due to the medical and psychiatric urgency (e.g., functional neurological symptoms, brief psychosis) or due to resistance to treatment (e.g., antidepressant pharmacotherapy) which seem to be indicated for the particular condition. This transdiagnostic schema is based on a combined utilization of etic and emic principles in the cultural understanding of psychiatric disorders. Namely, universal medical-psychiatric categories are conceived as tools of communication and mutual understanding rather than being mere appearances or primary disturbances.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAR, V. (2022). Dissociation Across Cultures: A Transdiagnostic Guide for Clinical Assessment and Management. Alpha psychiatry (Online), Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 95–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/435161

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Lewis-Fernandez R, Martinez-Taboas A, Şar V, Patel S, Boatin A. In: Wilson JP, So-Kum Tang CC, eds. Cross-Cultural Assessment of Trauma and PTSD. New York: Springer; 2007:279-317
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, USA: American Psychiatric Press; 1980
  3. Şar V. Epidemiology of dissociative disorders: an overview. Epidemiol Res Int. 2011;2011:1-8. [CrossRef] 4. Kluft RP. Diagnosing dissociative identity disorder: understanding and assessing manifestations can help clinicians identify and treat patients more effectively. Psychiatr Ann. 2005;35(8):633-643. [CrossRef] 5. Somer E. In: Van der Merwe AP, Sinason V, eds. Shattered but Unbroken: Voices of Triumph and Testimony. London: Karnac Press; 2016:89-110
  4. Steinberg M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders- Revised (SCID-D). Washington, USA: American Psychiatric Press; 1994
  5. Şar V. The many faces of dissociation: opportunities for innovative research in psychiatry. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2014;12(3):171- 179. [CrossRef] 8. Lyssenko L, Schmahl C, Bockhacker L, et al. Dissociation in psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis of studies using the dissociative experiences scale. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(1):37-46. [CrossRef] 9. Şar V, Ross CA. Dissociative disorders as a confounding factor in psychiatric research. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006;29(1):129-44. [CrossRef] 10. Ellenberger HF. The Discovery of the Unconscious. New York: Basic Books; 1970
  6. Brown RJ, Cardeña E, Nijenhuis ERS, Şar V, Van der Hart O. Should conversion disorder be re-classified as a dissociative disorder in DSM-V. Psychosomatics. 2007;48(5):369-378. [CrossRef] 12. Nijenhuis ER, van Dyck R, Spinhoven P, et al. Somatoform dissociation discriminates among diagnostic categories over and above general psychopathology. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1999;33(4):511-520. [CrossRef] 13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2013
  7. Şar V, Akyüz G, Kundakçi T, Kızıltan E, Doğan O. Childhood trauma, dissociation, and psychiatric comorbidity in patients with conversion disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:2271-2276. [CrossRef] 15. Tezcan E, Atmaca M, Kuloglu M, et al. Dissociative disorders in Turkish inpatients with conversion disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2003;44(4):324- 330. [CrossRef] 16. Şar V, Akyüz G, Dogan O, Oztürk E. The prevalence