Journals / Alphanumeric Journal / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

TÜRKİYE DE DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR İLE KARBONDİOKSİT EMİSYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ARDL YAKLAŞIMI İLE ARAŞTIRILMASI

THE EXAMINATION OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS AND CARBONDIOXIDE EMISSIONS IN TURKEY WITH ARDL APPROACH

Pages
107–112
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, in the long term fdi inflows and CO2 emissions do not move together.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environment is one of the gripping topic with the importance of the protection of it for future generations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 emissions takes big share.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, in the long term fdi inflows and CO2 emissions do not move together.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Environment is one of the gripping topic with the importance of the protection of it for future generations. In recent years, greenhouse gas emissions are important threat for environment. Within greenhouse gas emissions, CO2 emissions takes big share. On the other hand, in the global World capital movements gain speed and foreign direct investment inflows gradually increase in Turkey. To this respect, we need to think about possible effects of these investments to environmental quality of country. In this sense, this paper examines the relationship between foreign direct investment inflows and CO2 emissions for Turkey. The study covers 1980-2011 period. The Bounds test developed by Pesaran et al. (2001) is applied to investigate the relationship between series for given period of time. According to bounds test results, there is no cointegration relationship between foreign direct investment inflows and CO2 series for Turkey. In other words, in the long term fdi inflows and CO2 emissions do not move together.

Özet

Çevre, gelecek nesiller için korunmasının önemli olması bakımından ilgi çekici konulardan biridir. Son yıllarda, sera gazı emisyonları çevre için önemli bir tehdittir. Sera gazı emisyonları içinde de karbondioksit emisyonları büyük pay almaktadır. Diğer taraftan, küresel dünyada sermaye hareketleri hız kazanmaktadır ve Türkiyeye gelen doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar giderek artmaktadır. Bu noktada, bu yatırımların ülkenin çevresel kalitesine olası etkileri hakkında düşünmemiz gerekir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma Türkiye için doğrudan yabancı yatırım akımları ile karbondioksit emisyonları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Çalışma 1980-2011 periyodunu kapsamaktadır. Verilen zaman dilimi için seriler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesinde Pesaran vd (2001) tarafından geliştirilen Sınır testi kullanılmıştır. Sınır testi

🔖

Cite This Article

YAYLALI, M., DOĞAN, E. M., KARACA, Z., YILMAZ, V. M. (2022). TÜRKİYE DE DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR İLE KARBONDİOKSİT EMİSYONU ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ARDL YAKLAŞIMI İLE ARAŞTIRILMASI. Alphanumeric Journal, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 107–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/435131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharyya, Joysrı (2009), “FDI, Growth and The Environment: Evidence From Indıa on CO2 Emission During The Last Two Decades”, Journal of Economic Development, Volume 34, Number 1, 43-58.
  2. Almfraji, Mohammed Amin, Almsafir, Mahmoud Khalid, Yao, Liu (2014), “Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: The Case of Qatar”, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 1040-1045.
  3. Al-mulali, Usama (2012), “Factors Affecting CO2 Emission in the Middle East: A Panel Data Analysis”, Energy, 44, 564-569.
  4. Al-mulali, Usama, Sab, Che Normee Binti Che (2012), “The Impact of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission on the Economic and Financial Development in 19 Selected Countries”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 4365-4369.
  5. Blanco, Luisa, Gonzalez, Fidel, Ruiz, Isabel (2011), “The Impact of FDI on CO2 Emissions in Latin America”, School of Public Policy Working Papers. Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J. De, Lee, J-W. (1998), “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?”, Journal of International Economics, 45, 115-135.
  6. Chandran, V.G.R., Tang, Chor Foon (2013), “The Impacts of Transport Energy Consumption, Foreign Direct Investment and Income on CO2 Emissions in ASEAN-5 Economies”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, 445-453.
  7. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J. (1987), “Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, Vol. 55, No 2, 251-276.
  8. Granger, C.W.J., Newbold, P. (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111-120.
  9. Gujarati, D.N., (1995),
  10. Basic Econometrics, New York, McGraw-Hill. Güneş, Ahmet M. (2010), “İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi’nden Kyoto Protokolü’ne Küresel Isınmaya Karşı Uluslararası Alandaki Hukuki Gelişmeler”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Sayı 87, 43- 89. Halıcıoğlu, Ferda (2009), “An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey”, Energy Policy, 37, 1156-1164.
  11. Hayrullahoğlu, Betül (2012), “Çevresel Sorunlarla Mücadelede Karbon Vergisi”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 4, No 2, 1-11.
  12. Johansen, S., (1991), “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Auotoregressive Models”, Econometrica, Vol.59, No 6, 1551-1580.
  13. Johansen, S., (1995), “A Statistical Analysis of Cointegration for I(2) Variables”, Econometric Theory, 11, 25-59.
  14. Karagöl, E., Erbaykal, E., Ertuğrul, H.M., (2007),”Türkiye’de Ekonomik Büyüme ile Elektrik Tüketimi İlişkisi: Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı”, D