Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Temporal Horizons in the Study of Turkish Politics: Prevalence of Non-Causal Description and Seemingly Global Warming Type of Causality

Pages
117–133
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In thespirit of constructive criticism, I suggest a number of guidelines for researchdesign in order to address the problems of causality and temporality discussed inthis article, including awareness of multi-temporal equifinality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, I critically evaluate the causal and temporal dimension of socialscientific studies focusing on Turkish politics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Paul Pierson(2004) provided a classification of four types of causality based on the temporaldimension of causes and outcomes using metaphors of natural disasters: tornado,earthquake, meteorite, and global warming.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In thespirit of constructive criticism, I suggest a number of guidelines for researchdesign in order to address the problems of causality and temporality discussed inthis article, including awareness of multi-temporal equifinality.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article, I critically evaluate the causal and temporal dimension of socialscientific studies focusing on Turkish politics. A very important and yet oftenneglected aspect of social scientific analysis involves the temporal dimensionof causal processes. The temporal dimension of causal processes has directconsequences for operationalization and measurement, and hence it is an essentialcomponent of research design. Does the dependent variable (outcome) of interestunfold over the short term or the long term? Do the hypothesized independentvariables (causes) unfold over the short term or the long term? Paul Pierson(2004) provided a classification of four types of causality based on the temporaldimension of causes and outcomes using metaphors of natural disasters: tornado,earthquake, meteorite, and global warming. Operationalization and measurementof long term causes and outcomes pose a major challenge, compounded by thechallenges of periodization of causes and effects. Unfortunately, a large proportionof the studies of Turkish politics do not have a clearly discernible independentvariable (cause) to begin with, and they are thus better characterized as works of“non-causal description.” Moreover, many of the studies of Turkish politics tendto imply, but rarely state explicitly, a global warming type of causality (long termcause and long term outcome), which necessitates focusing even more intensivelyon such challenges of measurement and periodization. Yet the operationalizationof the key (dependent and independent) variables is often missing even in articlespublished in reputable academic journals of Turkish politics and society. In thespirit of constructive criticism, I suggest a number of guidelines for researchdesign in order to address the problems of causality and temporality discussed inthis article, including awareness of multi-temporal equifinality.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTÜRK, Ş. (2022). Temporal Horizons in the Study of Turkish Politics: Prevalence of Non-Causal Description and Seemingly Global Warming Type of Causality. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 117–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/434986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Akçadağ, Emine, and Elnur İsmayilov. “Ukrayna krizinin Rusya ve Japonya arasındaki Kuril Adaları sorununa etkisi.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 12, no. 48 (2016): 95–115.
  2. Aktürk, Şener. “The Fourth Style of Politics: Eurasianism as a Pro–Russian Rethinking of Turkey's Geopolitical Identity.” Turkish Studies 16, no. 1 (2015): 54–79.
  3. Aktürk, Şener. “NATO neden genişledi? Uluslararası ilişkiler kuramları ışığında NATO’nun genişlemesi ve ABD–Rusya iç siyaseti.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 9, no. 34 (2012): 73–97.
  4. Aktürk, Şener. “One Nation under Allah? Islamic Multiculturalism, Muslim Nationalism And Turkey’s Reforms For Kurds, Alevis, and Non–Muslims.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 4 (2018): 523–51. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2018.1434775. Aktürk, Şener. “Passport Identification and Nation–Building in Post–Soviet Russia.” Post–Soviet Affairs 26, no. 4 (2010): 314–41.
  5. Aktürk, Şener. “Regimes of Ethnicity: Comparative analysis of Germany, the Soviet Union/post–Soviet Russia, and Turkey.” World Politics 63, no. 1 (2011): 115–64.
  6. Aktürk, Şener. Regimes of Ethnicity and Nationhood in Germany, Russia, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  7. Aktürk, Şener. “Religion and Nationalism: Contradictions of Islamic Origins and Secular Nation Building in Turkey, Algeria, and Pakistan.” Social Science Quarterly 96, no. 3 (2015): 778–806.
  8. Aktürk, Şener. “Turkey’s Civil Rights Movement and the Reactionary Coup: Segregation, Emancipation, and the Western Reaction.” Insight Turkey 18, no. 3 (2016): 141–67.
  9. Aktürk, Şener. “Why Did the PKK Declare Revolutionary People’s War in July 2015?”
  10. POMEPS Contemporary Turkish Politics, November 29, 2016. Accessed December 16, 2017. https://pomeps.org/2016/11/29/why–did–the–pkk– declare–revolutionary–peoples–war–in–july–2015/.
  11. Ari, Başar. “Religion and Nation–Building in the Turkish Republic: Comparison of High School History Textbooks of 1931–41 and of 1942–50.” Turkish Studies 14, no. 2 (2013): 372–93.
  12. Aslantaş, Selim. “Osmanlı–Rus ilişkilerinden bir kesit: 1826 Akkerman Andlaşması'nın müzakereleri.” International Relations/Uluslararasi İlişkiler 9, no. 36 (2013): 149–69.
  13. Aydin, Umut. “Who is Afraid of Globalization? Turkish Attitudes toward Trade and Globalization.” Turkish Studies 15, no. 2 (2014): 322–40.
  14. Bennett, Andrew, and Jeffrey T. Checkel eds. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
  15. Erdoğan, Emre. “Dış politikada siyasallaşma: Türk kamuoyunun “Davos Krizi” ve etkileri hakkındaki değer