Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

The Relationship between the Tax Burden and Economic Growth in Turkey

Türkiye’de Vergi Yükü ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi

Pages
247–259
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study, Johansen cointegration analysis and error correction model (VEC) were used and it was concluded that there was a statistically significant and positive relationship between the variables according to the findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the most important objectives of fiscal policy is to realize economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our study is intended to describe the relationship between economic growth and the tax burden between 1980-2017 period in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study, Johansen cointegration analysis and error correction model (VEC) were used and it was concluded that there was a statistically significant and positive relationship between the variables according to the findings.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the most important objectives of fiscal policy is to realize economic growth. Taxes are among the most important fiscal policy instruments to achieve this objective. Another factor that is as effective as tax in achieving economic growth is the tax burden. The tax burden is considered as a cost for economic subjects. In this respect, the size of the tax burden is extremely important for the process of economic growth. Our study is intended to describe the relationship between economic growth and the tax burden between 1980-2017 period in Turkey. In our study, Johansen cointegration analysis and error correction model (VEC) were used and it was concluded that there was a statistically significant and positive relationship between the variables according to the findings.

Özet

Maliye politikasının en önemli amaçları arasında ekonomik büyümeyigerçekleştirmek gelmektedir. Vergiler de bu amaca ulaşmada devletin enönemli araçları arasında yer almaktadır. Ekonomik büyümeyi sağlamadavergi kadar etkili olan bir faktör de vergi yüküdür. Vergi yükü ekonomiközneler için bir maliyet unsuru olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu bakımdan,vergi yükünün boyutu ekonomik büyümenin seyri açısından son dereceönemlidir. Çalışmamız, Türkiye’de 1980-2017 dönemi arasında vergiyükünün ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi açıklamaya yöneliktir.Çalışmamızda, Johansen eş-bütünleşme analizi ve hata düzeltme modeli(VEC) kullanılmış ve elde edilen bulgulara göre değişkenler arasındaistatistiki olarak anlamlı ve pozitif yönde bir ilişkinin olduğu soncunaulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, Ö. E. (2022). The Relationship between the Tax Burden and Economic Growth in Turkey. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 247–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/434841

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. ABDİYEVA, R. & BAYGONUŞOVA, D. (2016). “Geçiş Ekonomilerinde Vergi Gelirleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Kırgızistan Örneği”, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, (53), 59-71.
  2. AÇIKGÖZ, Ş. (2008) “Türkiye’de Vergi Gelirleri, Vergi Yapısı ve İktisadi Büyüme: 1968- 2006”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, 19(68), 91-113.
  3. ADKISSON, R.V., & MOHAMMED, M. (2014). “Tax Structure and State Economic Growth during the Great Recession”, The Social Science Journal, 51, 79–89. ANASTASSİOU T., & Dritsaki C. (2005). “TaxRevenuesandEconomicGrowth: An EmpiricalInvestigationforGreece Using Causality Analysis”, Journal of SocialSciences, 1(2), 99-104.
  4. ARDIÇ, O., ERUS, B. ve SOYDAN, G. (2010). “An Evaluation of Indirect Taxes in Turkey”, Economics Bulletin, 30(4), 2787-2801.
  5. ARNOLD, J. (2008) “Do Tax Structures Affect Aggregate Economic Growth? Empirical Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries”, Economics Department Working Papers, 643, OECD. BARRO, R. J. (1996). “Institutions and Growth: An Introductory Essay”, Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2) (Jun., 1996),. 145-148
  6. CANAVIRE-BACARREZA, G., MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ, J. & VULOVIC, V. (2013) “Taxation and Economic Growth in Latin America”, IDB Working Paper Series, 431, Inter-American Development Bank. DACKEHAG, M., HANSSON, Å. (2012). “Taxation of income and economic growth: An empirical analysis of 25 rich OECD countries”, Department of Economics School of Economics and Management, Working Paper 2012:6. DARNELL, A.C. (1994). “A Dictionary Of Econometrics”, Printed and Bound In Great Britain By Hartnolls Limited, Bodmin-Cornwall, England DEMİR, M. ve SEVER, E. (2017). “Vergi Gelirleri Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Panel Veri Analizi”, Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 51- 66. DURKAYA, M. ve CEYLAN, S. (2006). “Vergi Gelirleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme”, Maliye Dergisi, 150, 79-89.
  7. EASTERLY, W. & REBELO, S. (1993). “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation”, NBER Working Paper, 4499, Cambridge. ENGEN, S. & SKINNER, J. (1992). “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth”, NBER Working Paper, 4223, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. ERDOĞAN, E., TOPCU, M. ve BAHAR, O. (2013). “Vergi Gelirleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Ekonomisi Üzerine Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Analizi”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 50(576), 99-109.
  8. FURCERI, D. & KARRAS, G. (2008). “Tax Changesand Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence for a Panel of OECD Countries”, OECD, ECB Public Finance Worksho