Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Electronic Service Quality Dimensions and Hedonic Browsing on Online Impulsive Buying Behavior of Consumers

Tüketicilerin Çevrim İçi İtkisel Satın Alma Davranışlarında Elektronik Hizmet Kalite Boyutlarının ve Hedonik Gezinmenin Etkisi

Pages
993–1013
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, urge to buy impulsively positively affects the online impulse buying behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of electronic service quality dimensions, urge to buy impulsively and hedonic browsing variables on online impulse buying behavior.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 18 years and older consumers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, urge to buy impulsively positively affects the online impulse buying behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effects of electronic service quality dimensions, urge to buy impulsively and hedonic browsing variables on online impulse buying behavior. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 18 years and older consumers. A total of 338 valid data obtained. As a result of the analysis, it is seen that design and security / privacy of electronic service quality dimensions have a positive effect on urge to buy impulsively. Likewise, hedonic browsing on the internet positively affects both the urge to buy impulsively and online impulsive buying behavior. Finally, urge to buy impulsively positively affects the online impulse buying behavior.

Özet

Araştırmanın temel amacı elektronik hizmet kalite boyutları, itkisel satın alma dürtüsü ve hedonik gezinme değişkenlerinin çevrim içi itkisel satın alma davranışı üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın ana kütlesini Türkiye’deki 18 yaşından büyük bireyler oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada ilişkisel araştırma modelinden yararlanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi ve öne sürülen araştırma hipotezlerinin testi için yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Toplam 338 geçerli veri ile gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda elektronik hizmet kalite boyutlarından tasarım ve güvenlik/gizliliğin bireylerin itkisel satın alma dürtüsünü olumlu yönde etkilediği görülmektedir. Aynı şekilde, internette hedonik gezinme, bireylerin itkisel satın alma dürtüsü ve çevrim içi itkisel satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilerken, itkisel satın alma dürtüsü de çevrim içi itkisel satın alma davranışını olumlu yönde etkilemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAHAN, M. O. (2022). The Effect of Electronic Service Quality Dimensions and Hedonic Browsing on Online Impulsive Buying Behavior of Consumers. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 993–1013. https://ajindex.com/articles/434808

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. AKRAM, U., HUI, P., KHAN, M. K., TANVEER, Y., MEHMOOD, K., & AHMAD, W. (2018). How website quality affects online impulse buying. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. ANG, S. S., LIEW, W. Q., WAI, K. C., & YEOH, W. T. (2015). The influencing factors on generation Y online impulsive buying behaviour (Doctoral dissertation, UTAR). BARNES, S. J., & VIDGEN, R. T. (2002). An integrative approach to the assessment of ecommerce quality. J. Electron. Commerce Res., 3(3), 114-127.
  2. BEATTY, S. E., & FERRELL, M. E. (1998). Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 169–191.
  3. BITNER, M.J., BROWN, S.B., & MEUTER, M.L. (2000), “Technology infusion in Service Encounters”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 138-149.
  4. BRESSOLLES, G., DURRIEU, F., & GIRAUD, M. (2007). The impact of electronic service quality's dimensions on customer satisfaction and buying impulse. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 6(1), 37-56.
  5. BROWN, I. T. (2002). Individual and technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web‐based learning technologies in a developing country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(1), 1-15.
  6. CHAKRABORTY, S. (2017). An Empirical Investigation On The Association Between Consumer Online Impulsive Buying Behavior And Website Quality-A Study With Special Reference To Flipkart Online Store. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3, 2454-1362.
  7. CHAN, T. K., CHEUNG, C. M., & LEE, Z. W. (2017). The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis. Information & Management, 54(2), 204-217.
  8. CHEN, Y., & ZHANG, L. (2015). Influential factors for online impulse buying in China: a model and its empirical analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on eLearning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government (EEE) (p. 45). CHEN, J. V., SU, B. C., & WIDJAJA, A. E. (2016). Facebook C2C social commerce: A study of online impulse buying. Decision Support Systems, 83, 57-69.
  9. ÇOKLUK, Ö., ŞEKERCİOĞLU, G., & BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, 4. Baskı,
  10. Ankara,
  11. Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  12. DAWSON, S., & KIM, M. (2009). External and internal trigger cues of impulse buying online. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(1), 20-34.
  13. DEWI, M. A. A., NURROHMAH, I., SAHADI, N., SENSUSE, D. I., & NOPRISON, H. (2017, October). Analysing the critical factors influencing consumers'e-impulse