SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Foreign Direct Investment And Macro Variables: 2010- 2019 An Implementation For Turkey

Cumhur ŞAHİN
Pages
755–769
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the empirical findings, it was found that the variables were cointegrated in the long term, in other words, the variables were related to each other in the long term and moved in the same direction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Among the factors of production, the most needed factor in developing countries is capital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the relationship between foreign direct investment and consumer price index, indicator interest rate, GDP and trade openness ratio which are thought to affect these investments are analyzed for Turkey's case, as of the last decade between the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the empirical findings, it was found that the variables were cointegrated in the long term, in other words, the variables were related to each other in the long term and moved in the same direction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Among the factors of production, the most needed factor in developing countries is capital. Capital transfer between countries has become very important with the acceleration of globalization. In this context, it is seen that developing countries focus more on foreign direct investment in terms of their economic development. In this study, the relationship between foreign direct investment and consumer price index, indicator interest rate, GDP and trade openness ratio which are thought to affect these investments are analyzed for Turkey's case, as of the last decade between the first quarter of 2010 and the fourth quarter of 2019. According to the empirical findings, it was found that the variables were cointegrated in the long term, in other words, the variables were related to each other in the long term and moved in the same direction.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, C. (2022). Foreign Direct Investment And Macro Variables: 2010- 2019 An Implementation For Turkey. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 755–769. https://ajindex.com/articles/434803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ALGUACIL, M. T., CUADROS, A. & ORTS, V. (2002). “Foreign direct investment, exports and domestic performance in Mexico: A causality analysis”. Economic Letters, 77: 371-376.
  2. ALICI, A. A. & UCAL, M. Ş. (2003). “Foreign direct investment, exports and output growth of Turkey: causality analysis”. European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference (1-17.pp.). http: //www.etsg.org/ETSG2003/papers/alici.pdf ASEIDU, E. (2002). “On the Determinants on Foreign Direct Investment to Developing countries: Is Africa Different?”. World Development, 30(1): 107-119.
  3. ASTERIOU, D. & HALL, S. G. (2007). Applied econometrics. Palgra and Macmillan, New York. CAMPOS, N. F. & KINOSHITA, Y. (2003). “Why Does FDI Go Where it Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies”. IMF Working Papers 03/228, International Monetary Fund. DUMLUDAĞ, D. & ŞÜKRÜOĞLU, D. (2007). “The impact of macroeconomic and institutional variables on foreign direct investment flows in emerging market”. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 23(2): 133-166.
  4. EMİRMAHMUTOĞLU, F. & KÖSE, N. (2011). “Testing for Granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels”. Economic Modelling, 28: 870-876.
  5. ENDERS, W. (1995). Applied econometric time series. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. GRANGER, C.WJ. (1969). “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods”. Econometrica, 37(3): 424-438.
  6. GRANGER, C.WJ. & NEWBOLD, P. (1974). “Spurious in econometrics”. Journal Of Economics, 2: 111-120.
  7. GÜRSOY, F. & KALYONCU, H. (2012).” Foreign Direct Investment and Growth Relationship in Georgia”. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(3): 267-271.
  8. HANSEN, H., RAND. J. & TARP. F. (2003). “Are FDI Inflows Complements or Substitutes Across Borders: Empirical Evidence from Five Asian Economies”. MPRA Paper 72834, University Library of Munich, Germany. JOHANSEN, S. (1991). “Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models”. Econometrica, 59:1551-1580.
  9. JOHANSEN, S. (1995). Likelihood-based ınference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press,
  10. England KOYUNCU, F.T. (2010). “Türkiye’de Seçilmiş Makroekonomik Değişkenlerin Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları Üzerindeki Etkisinin Yapısal VAR Analizi:1990-2009 Dönemi”. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1): 55-62. MARJANOVİĆ, V. & MARJANOVİĆ, M. (2014). “Simulation of industrial development as the key determinant of the strategy of Serbia economic restructuring”. Teme, 38(