Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

A Phenomenological Research on the Perceptions of Low-Paid Newly Graduated Engineers and Their Managers on the Formation and Scope of the Psychological Contract

Psikolojik Sözleşmenin Oluşumu ve Kapsamına İlişkin Düşük Maaşla İstihdam Edilen Yeni Mezun Mühendisler ve Yöneticilerinin Algıları Üzerine Fenomenolojik Bir Araştırma

Pages
173–192
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the phenomenological analysis, it was determined that the low-paid newly graduated engineers and their managers have transactional and relational based differences in their perceptions of formation and content of the psychological contract.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to research the low-paid newly graduated engineers perceive whom as the opposite party, how perceptions of the parties of psychological contract are formed and these engineers and their managers’ mutual expectations and obligations under the psychological contract.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accordingly, using qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were held with 15 low-paid newly graduated engineers who were employed in different fields and 11 managers of them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the phenomenological analysis, it was determined that the low-paid newly graduated engineers and their managers have transactional and relational based differences in their perceptions of formation and content of the psychological contract.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to research the low-paid newly graduated engineers perceive whom as the opposite party, how perceptions of the parties of psychological contract are formed and these engineers and their managers’ mutual expectations and obligations under the psychological contract. Accordingly, using qualitative research design, semi-structured interviews were held with 15 low-paid newly graduated engineers who were employed in different fields and 11 managers of them. As a result of the phenomenological analysis, it was determined that the low-paid newly graduated engineers and their managers have transactional and relational based differences in their perceptions of formation and content of the psychological contract.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, düşük maaşla istihdam edilen yeni mezun mühendislerinpsikolojik sözleşme kapsamında karşı taraf olarak kimi algıladıkları,tarafların psikolojik sözleşmeye dair algılarının nasıl oluştuğu ve psikolojiksözleşme kapsamındaki karşılıklı beklenti ve yükümlülüklere ilişkin düşükmaaşla istihdam edilen yeni mezun mühendisler ile yöneticilerinin bakışaçıları araştırılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda nitel araştırma tasarımı kullanılarak,farklı alanlarda düşük maaşla istihdam edilen yeni mezun 15 mühendis vebu mühendislerin üstü konumundaki 11 yönetici ile yarı yapılandırılmışgörüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan fenomenolojik analiz sonucunda,psikolojik sözleşmenin oluşumu ve kapsamına ilişkin düşük maaşla istihdamedilen yeni mezun mühendisler ile yöneticilerinin işlemsel ve ilişkiseltemelde farklı algılara sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAR, N. (2022). A Phenomenological Research on the Perceptions of Low-Paid Newly Graduated Engineers and Their Managers on the Formation and Scope of the Psychological Contract. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 173–192. https://ajindex.com/articles/434795

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AKAR, N. (2017a). “Mavi Yakalı Çalışanların Psikolojik Sözleşmeye İlişkin Algılarının Oluşumu ve Kapsamı Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma”. V. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (1-7).
  2. AKAR, N. (2017b). “İşverenler ile Mavi Yakalı Çalışanların Psikolojik Sözleşme Kapsamındaki Karşılıklı Beklenti ve Yükümlülüklerine Dair Algılarının Belirlenmesi”. Uluslararası Multidisipliner Çalışmaları Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (239-245).
  3. ANDERSON, N., & SCHALK, R. (1998). “The Psychological Contract in Retrospect and Prospect”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19: 637-647.
  4. ARAS, M., KARAKİRAZ, A., BAYRAKTAROĞLU, S., & ÖZEN KUTANİS, R. (2016). “Türkiye’de Psikolojik Sözleşme Çalışmalarının Genel Görünümü”, R. ÖZEN KUTANİS (Ed.), Türkiye’de Örgütsel Davranış Çalışmaları II (47-67),
  5. Gazi Kitabevi,
  6. Ankara.
  7. CONWAY, N., & BRINER, R. B. (2005). Understanding Psychological Contracts at Work: A Critical Evaluation of Theory and Research, Oxford University Press,
  8. USA. COYLE-SHAPIRO, J. A. M., & KESSLER, I. (2002). “Exploring Reciprocity Through the Lens of the Psychological Contract: Employee and Employer Perspectives”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(1): 69-86.
  9. CRESWELL, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks California. FREESE, C., & SCHALK, R. (1996). “Implications of Differences in Psychological Contracts for Human Resource Management”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(4): 501-509.
  10. GUEST, D. E. (2004). “The Psychology of the Employment Relationship: An Analysis Based on the Psychological Contract”. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4): 541-555.
  11. GUEST, D. E., & CONWAY, N. (2002). “Communicating the Psychological Contract: An Employer Perspective”. Human Resource Management Journal, 12(2): 22-38.
  12. HERRIOT, P., MANNING, W. E. G., & KIDD, J. M. (1997). “The Content of the Psychological Contract”. British Journal of Management, 8(2): 151-162.
  13. HOFSTEDE, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills California. HUSSERL, E. (2010). Fenomenoloji Üzerine Beş Ders. H. TEPE (Çev.). Bilgesu Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  14. KESKİN, U. (2016). “Çalışma Yaşamına Bakış Açılarının Tarihsel Süreçteki Değişimi ve Yönetimcilik (Managerializm) Anlayışının Yükselişi”. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3): 1-18.
  15. KOTTER, J. P. (1973). “The Psychological Contract: Managing the Joining-up Proce