SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of Anomalies in Scope of Behavioral Finance

Davranışsal Finans Kapsamında Anomalilerin İncelenmesi

Yusuf POLAT
Haluk DUMAN
Pages
603–630
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It’s understood that cognitive reflection level and behavioral anomalies observed caused by heuristics are found to have a direct relationship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:From earliest periods of economy literature to neo-classical period, it was accepted that subject of social sciences, which is the main research subject, isn’t rational in terms of human beings and assumption that individual cannot always exhibit characteristics that are framed as economic people at anytime, anywhere.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, in this period, acceptance of individual cannot always be rational is based on the fact that individual is a being with feelings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It’s understood that cognitive reflection level and behavioral anomalies observed caused by heuristics are found to have a direct relationship.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

From earliest periods of economy literature to neo-classical period, it was accepted that subject of social sciences, which is the main research subject, isn’t rational in terms of human beings and assumption that individual cannot always exhibit characteristics that are framed as economic people at anytime, anywhere. However, in this period, acceptance of individual cannot always be rational is based on the fact that individual is a being with feelings. Systematic behavioral errors arising from mental structure of individual and observed in all individuals are categorized with help of cognitive reflection test in which cognitive level of individual is determined. It’s understood that cognitive reflection level and behavioral anomalies observed caused by heuristics are found to have a direct relationship.

Özet

Ekonomi literatürünün ilk dönemlerinden Neo-klasik döneme gelinene kadar sosyal bilimlerin temel araştırma konusu olan insanın belirli açılardan rasyonel olmadığı ve bu varsayımın bireyin her koşulda ekonomik insan olarak çerçevelenen karakteristikleri göstermeyebileceği konusu benimsenen bir olgu olarak kabul edilegelmiştir. Ancak bu dönemde bireyin her zaman rasyonel olamayacağının kabulü bireyin duyguları olan bir varlık olması gerçeğine dayandırılmıştır. Bireyin zihinsel yapısından kaynaklanan ve tüm bireylerde gözlemlenebilen sistematik davranışsal anomaliler bireyin biliş düzeyinin tespit edildiği bilişsel yansıma testi yardımı ile kategorize edilmektedir. Davranışsal finansın temel aldığı bireyin bilişsel yansıma düzeyi ile bireyde hevristiklerden kaynaklanan davranışsal anomalilerin yapılan çalışmalar sonucunda doğru yönlü bir ilişki sergilediği anlaşılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, Y., DUMAN, H. (2022). Investigation of Anomalies in Scope of Behavioral Finance. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 603–630. https://ajindex.com/articles/433518

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. BAKER, H. K., & NOFSINGER, J. R. (2002). “Psychological Biases of Investors”. Financial services review, 11(2), 97-116.
  2. BARNES, T. J. (1988). “Rationality and Relativism in Economic Geography: An Interpretive Review of the Homo Economicus Assumption”. Progress in Human Geography, 12.4, 473-496.
  3. BLAUG, M. (1992). The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain. Cambridge University Press.
  4. CAMPITELLI, G., & GERRANS, P. (2014). “Does the Cognitive Reflection Test Measure Cognitive Reflection? A Mathematical Modeling Approach”. Memory & Cognition, 42(3), 434-447.
  5. CHEN, L., KÖK, A. G., & TONG, J. D. (2013). “The Effect of Payment Schemes on Inventory Decisions. The Role of mental accounting”. Management Science, 59(2), 436-451.
  6. CHIRA, I., ADAMS, M., & THORNTON, B. (2008). “Behavioral bias within the decision making process”. Journal of Business & Economics Research 6(8), 11-20.
  7. COLANDER, D. (2000). “The death of neoclassical economics”. Journal of the history of Economic Thought, 22(2), 127-143.
  8. COWEN, T. (2004). How Do Economists Think About Rationality? Satisficing and Maximizing Moral Theorists on Practical Reason, 213-243.
  9. ÇALIK, Ü., & DÜZÜ, G. (2009). “İktisat ve Psikoloji”. Akademik Bakış, 1-13.
  10. DE BONDT, W., MURADOGLU, G., SHEFRIN, H., & STAIKOURAS, S. K. (2008). “Behavioral finance: Quo vadis?” Journal of Applied Finance, 18(2), 7-20.
  11. DHAR, R., & NOVEMSKY, N. (2008). “Beyond rationality: The content of preferences”. Journal of Consumer Psychology 18.3, 175-178.
  12. ELSTER, J. (1986). An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press.
  13. FORBES, D. P. (2005). “Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?” Journal of business venturing, 20(5), 623-640.
  14. HAYTA, A. B. (2014). “Bireysel Yatırımcıların Finansal Risk Algısına Etki Eden Psikolojik Önyargılar”. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 183(183), 329-352.
  15. HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (1994). “Evolutionary rationality,“homo economicus,” and the foundations of social order”. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 17.1, 41-69.
  16. HIRSHLEIFER, D. (2001). “Investor psychology and asset pricing”. The Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533-1597.
  17. KAHNEMAN, D. (1979). “Lecture 2-3:
  18. Behavioral Preferences, Prospect Theory and Myopic Loss aversion”. Risk, 47, 313-327.
  19. KAHNEMAN, D., & RIEPE, M. W. (1998). “Aspects of investor psychology”. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-65.
  20. KEYNES, J. M. (2008). Genel Teori: İstihdam, Faiz ve Paranın Genel Teorisi. Kalkedon Yayıncılık. LIBERALI, J. M., REYNA,