Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9

New Approaches in the European Left: Individual, Civil Society, Democracy and Socialism

Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Avrupa Solunda Yeni Yaklaşımlar: Birey, Sivil Toplum, Demokrasi ve Sosyalizm

Pages
177–201
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The differences between the former socialist tradition, which was represented by Soviet Union, and the new left, which have been popular for last 20 years, and the main argument of the new left are discussed in the conclusion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to analyse and categorise the discussions in Europe about socialism in post cold war era.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve this aim, firstly, both the historical and political reasons which forced the socialists to chance their policies in 1980s and the main concepts which the socialists have discussed after seeing the necessities of change are determined and analysed Secondly, the discussions which have been made among the socialist scholars in Europe are categorised and summarised.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The differences between the former socialist tradition, which was represented by Soviet Union, and the new left, which have been popular for last 20 years, and the main argument of the new left are discussed in the conclusion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to analyse and categorise the discussions in Europe about socialism in post cold war era. In order to achieve this aim, firstly, both the historical and political reasons which forced the socialists to chance their policies in 1980s and the main concepts which the socialists have discussed after seeing the necessities of change are determined and analysed Secondly, the discussions which have been made among the socialist scholars in Europe are categorised and summarised. The differences between the former socialist tradition, which was represented by Soviet Union, and the new left, which have been popular for last 20 years, and the main argument of the new left are discussed in the conclusion.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, sosyalizmle ilgili olarak Avrupa’da soğuk savaş sonrasında sürdürülen tartışmaları sınıflandırmak ve analiz etmektir. Bu amaca ulaşmak için, ilk başta, hem 1980’lerde sosyalistleri politikalarını değiştirmeye zorlayan politik ve tarihsel nedenler, hem de sosyalistlerin değişimin gerekliliğini görmelerinden sonra tartıştıkları temel kavramlar belirlenecek ve değerlendirilecektir. İkinci olarak ise, Avrupa’da sosyalist araştırmacılar arasında yapılan tartışmalar sınıflandırılarak özetlenecektir. Sovyetler Birliğinin temsil ettiği eski sosyalizm geleneği ile son yirmi yıl içinde popülerleşen yeni sol arasındaki farklılıklar ve yeni solun temel argümanları ise sonuç bölümünde ele alınacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYNAR, M. K. (2022). New Approaches in the European Left: Individual, Civil Society, Democracy and Socialism. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 9, 177–201. https://ajindex.com/articles/433236

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. BARRY, Norman. (1997) Conservative Thought and Welfare State, Political Studies, June, Vol. 45, No. 2 331-345.
  2. BENHABIB, Seyla. (1996) Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy, Democracy and Difference, Contesting the Boundaries of Political, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 67-93.
  3. BERNHARD, Michael. (1993) Civil Society and Democratic Transition in the East Central Europe, Political Science Quarterly, Sayı 108, 307-326.
  4. BOBBIO, Norberto. (1999)
  5. Bir Politik Ayrımın Anlamı, Sağ ve Sol, (Çev: Zühal Yılmaz), Dost yay., Ankara.
  6. CODDINGTON, Anne. (1993)
  7. Embracing Equality And Difference, An Interview with Anne Showstack Sassoon, Talking About Tomorrow, a New Radical Politics, Ed. By Stuart Wilks, Pluto Press, London, 101-108.
  8. DAVEY, Kevin. (1993)
  9. New Directions for Labour, An Interview with Mike Rustin, Talking About Tomorrow, a New Radical Politics, Ed. By Stuart Wilks, Pluto Press, London, 20-25.
  10. FISHMAN, Nina. (1993)
  11. Seeking a Radical Party, Talking About Tomorrow, a New Radical Politics, An Interview with David Marquand Ed. By Stuart Wilks, Pluto Press, London, 3-12
  12. FOLEY, Michael. EDWARD, Bob. (1998) Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol: 42, September, 5-20.
  13. GIDDENS, Anthony.( 1994) Beyond Left and Right The Future of Radical Politics, Polity Press,
  14. London. GIDDENS, Anthony. (2001)
  15. Third Way, The Renewal of Social Democracy, Polity Press, London,. HABERMAS, Jurgen. (1996)
  16. Three Normative Models of Democracy, Democracy and Difference Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Ed. by Seyla Binhabib Princeton University Press, Princeton, 21-30.
  17. HIRST, Paul. (1994)
  18. Associative Democracy, Dissent, Spring, 241-247.
  19. HIRST, Paul. (1997)
  20. From Statism to Pluralism, Democracy, Civil Society and Global Politics, UCL Press,
  21. London. KEANE, John. (1994) Sivil Toplum Devlet: Avrupa’da yeni Yaklaşımlar, (Çev: Erkan Akın), Ayrıntı yay., İstanbul.
  22. KELLNER, Douglas, Steven BEST. (2001)
  23. The Post Modern Adventure Scinece, Technology, And Cultural Studies at the Third Millennium, Taylor&Francis Books, Hampshire. KELLNER, Douglas.(1995)
  24. The end of Orthodox Marxism, Marxism in the Post Modern Age Confronting the New World order, Ed. By Antonio Callari, Stephen Cullenberg, Carole Biwener, Guilford Inc., New York, London,33-41.
  25. LACLAU, Ernesto,.MOUFFE C.hantal. (1992) Hegemonya ve Sosyalist Strateji, (Çev.A.Kardam-D.Şahiner), Birikim Yayınları,
  26. İstanbul.
  27. LENT, Adam. (1993) For A Radic