Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

A New Application for International Banking Regulation and It's Effects on Developing Countries

Uluslararası Bankaların Düzenlenmesine Yönelik Yeni Bir Uygulama Olarak Basel-II ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelere Etkisi

Pages
200–221
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Some approach of the argreement argued that new accord will decrease the capital flows to the developing countries, however the others claim that the effect on developing countries will be moderate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The necessity for common standart among the internationally active banks, resulted in publishment of Basel-I.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It’s effect was great and was adopted by more than 100 countries after putting into practice.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Some approach of the argreement argued that new accord will decrease the capital flows to the developing countries, however the others claim that the effect on developing countries will be moderate.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The necessity for common standart among the internationally active banks, resulted in publishment of Basel-I. It’s effect was great and was adopted by more than 100 countries after putting into practice. But in the lenght of the time it lost to effect on financial marketing then which been required a revision. For this reason Basel-II Accord was published in 2004. The new arrangement has more risk sensitive framework. It’s suggested that Basel-II will have some influences on developing countries. This suggestions, which can be considered as positive and negative. Some approach of the argreement argued that new accord will decrease the capital flows to the developing countries, however the others claim that the effect on developing countries will be moderate.

Özet

G-10 ülkelerinde bulunan ve uluslararası alanda faaliyet gösteren bankalar arasında ortak bir standart oluşturma ihtiyacı Basel-I’in yayınlanmasıyla sonuçlanmıştır. Uygulamaya konulmasının ardından etkisi büyük olmuş ve 100’den fazla ülke tarafından kabul edilmiştir. Ancak zamanla finansal piyasalardaki etkisini yitirmesine paralel olarak düzenlemeyi gözden geçirme gereği ortaya çıkmıştır. Buna yönelik olarak Basel-II Uzlaşısı 2004 yılında yayınlanmıştır. Bu yeni düzenleme daha duyarlı risk ölçüm yöntemlerine sahiptir. Basel-II’nin gelişmekte olan ülkeler üzerinde çeşitli etkilerinin olacağı öne sürülmektedir. Olumsuz ve olumlu bakış açıları olarak değerlendirilebilecek bu görüşler, söz konusu ülkelere verilen kredilerde yapısal değişiklilerin olması iddiasına karşılık, düzenlemenin etkisinin sınırlı olacağını öngören yaklaşımlardan oluşmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, M. (2022). A New Application for International Banking Regulation and It's Effects on Developing Countries. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 200–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/433212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. BANKACILIK DÜZENLEME VE DENETLEME KURUMU (2005), 10 Soruda Yeni Basel Sermaye Uzlaşısı (Basel –II), Ankara. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (1988), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standarts, Basel. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (1996) Amendment to the Capıtal Accord to Incorporate Market Risks, Basel. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (1999),
  2. A New Capital Adequacy Framework, Consultative Paper, Basel. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (2001),
  3. Consultative Document, Pillar 3 (Market Discipline),Basel. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (2003),
  4. BIS History, Bank For International Settlements, Basel. BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION (2004), History of the Basel Committee and its Membership, Bank for Internatıonal Settlements, Basel. BEŞİNCİ, M. (2005), Basel Sermaye Yeterliliği ve Türk Bankacılık Sektörünün Basel-II’ye Uyum Süreci, Finans-Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, No:498, 15-27.
  5. BUCH, C.M. (2000), Information or Regulation: What is Driving the International Activities of Commercial Banks?, Kiel Working Paper, No:1011, No:1-11.
  6. CORNFORD, A. (2004), Basel-II:Vintage 2003, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 12(1), 22-35.
  7. DANIELSSON, J., EMBRECHTS P., GOODHART C., KEATING C., MUENNİCH F., RENAULT O., SHIN H.S. (2001),
  8. An Academic Response to Basel-II, LSE Financial Markets Group and ESRC Research Centre, Special Paper Series No:130, 1-17.
  9. DELİCE, G., DOĞAN A., UZUN A.M. (2004), Finansal Regülasyon ve Piyasa Disiplini,Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 101-130.
  10. ERDÖNMEZ, P. A. (2000), Yeni Sermaye Yeterliliği Çerçevesi: Piyasa Disiplini, Basel Komite, Bankacılar Dergisi, No:34, 116-121.
  11. GIESE, G. (2002), Basel-II Uzlaşısı’na İlişkin Eleştiriler ve İyileştirme Önerileri (Çev. M.A.Boyacıoğlu), Bankacılar Dergisi, No:41, 71-79.
  12. GORDY, M.B, HOWELLS, B. (2004), Procyclicality in Basel II: Can We Treat the Disease Without Killing the Patient?, www.bis.org/bcbs/events/rtf04gordy_howells.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 16.02.2006.
  13. HAYES, S., SAPORTA V. (2002), The impact of the new Basel Accord on the supply of capital to emerging market economies, Financial Stability Review, December, 110-114.
  14. HIMINO, R. (2004), Basel-II Towards a New Common Language, BIS Quarterly Review, September, Bank For International Settlements, 1-10.
  15. JONES, S.G., SPRATT, S. (2001), Will the Proposed New Basel Accord Have a Negative Effect on Developing Countries, Institute of Development Studies,