Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13

The Comparative Analysis of the Ethical Decision-Making Models Inspired the Cognitive Moral Development Model of Kohlberg

Kohlberg'in Bilişsel Ahlaki Gelişim Modelinden Yararlanan Etiksel Karar Verme Modellerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Pages
24–61
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper, firstly Kohlberg’s model is being explained in detail and then the models mentioned above taken into consideration in terms of their characteristics and benefits which they have brought for the relevance literature comparatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:“The Cognitive Moral Development Model” of Kohlberg has been used as a fundamental source of reference and inspiration for most of the models which were built up related to ethical decision-making process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 10 models of ethical decision-making process which are being discussed in this study have been belonged to the writers, who are inspired by Kohlberg’s model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper, firstly Kohlberg’s model is being explained in detail and then the models mentioned above taken into consideration in terms of their characteristics and benefits which they have brought for the relevance literature comparatively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

“The Cognitive Moral Development Model” of Kohlberg has been used as a fundamental source of reference and inspiration for most of the models which were built up related to ethical decision-making process. The 10 models of ethical decision-making process which are being discussed in this study have been belonged to the writers, who are inspired by Kohlberg’s model. There have been considerable similarities among these models because they have used Kohlberg’s model as a starting point or inspired by the other models which were developed by the followers of him; but each has been providing benefits to relevant literature in different respects. In this paper, firstly Kohlberg’s model is being explained in detail and then the models mentioned above taken into consideration in terms of their characteristics and benefits which they have brought for the relevance literature comparatively.

Özet

Kohlberg’in geliştirmiş olduğu “bilişsel ahlâkî gelişim modeli”, örgütlerde etiksel karar verme sürecine ilişkin olarak geliştirilen modellerin çoğu için temel bir başvuru ve esin kaynağı olmuştur. Bu çalışmada yer verilen 10 etiksel karar verme modeli, Kohlberg’in kuramından ve modelinden büyük ölçüde yararlanan yazarlara aittir. Bu modeller, Kohlberg’in çalışmasından yola çıktıkları ya da onun izdaşlarının geliştirdikleri modellerden yararlandıkları için, aralarında önemli benzerlikler bulunmakta; ancak her biri ilgili yazına farklı açılardan katkılar sağlamaktadır. Çalışmada, önce Kohlberg’in modeli ayrıntılı şekilde incelenmekte; daha sonra ise sözü edilen modeller, özellikleri ve ilgili yazına olan katkıları açısından karşılaştırmalı bir analize tabi tutulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAT, T., AYTEMİZ, O. S. (2022). The Comparative Analysis of the Ethical Decision-Making Models Inspired the Cognitive Moral Development Model of Kohlberg. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 13, 24–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/433202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ARMSTRONG, M.B., KETZ, J.E. ve OWSEN, D. (2003) Ethics Education in Accounting: Moving toward Ethical Motivation and Ethical Behavior, Journal of Accounting Education, 21(1), 1-16.
  2. ATEŞ, Ö., ERDOST, H.E. (2001) Kohlberg’in Ahlak Devrelerinde Neredeyiz?, 9. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi 24-26 Mayıs 2001, 703-716.
  3. AYDINTAN, B. (2005) Çok Uluslu İşletmelerde Kültürel Çeşitlilik ve Etkileri, SEYMEN, O. A. ve BOLAT, T. Küreselleşme ve Çok Uluslu İşletmecilik içinde, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 153-180.
  4. BEU, D.S. ve BUCKLEY, M.R. (2004) Using Accountability to Create a More Ethical Climate, Human Resource Management Review, 14, 67-83.
  5. BOLAT, O.İ. (2006) İş Etiği Olgusu Üzerine Ayrıntılı Bir Kavramsal Değerlendirme: İş Etiği ve Verimlilik İlişkisi, Verimlilik Dergisi, 2006/2, 9-28.
  6. BRADY, F.N. ve HATCH, M.J. (1992) General Causal Models in Business Ethics: An Essay on Colliding Research Traditions, Journal of Business Ethics, 11(4), 307-315.
  7. COLBY, A., KOHLBERG, L. ve KAUFFMAN, K. (1987) Theoretical Introduction to the Measurement of Moral Judgment, COLBY, A. ve KOHLBERG, L., The Measurement of Moral Judgment Volume I Theoretical Foundations and Research Validation içinde, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-61.
  8. COTTONE, R.R. ve CLAUS R.E. (2000) Ethical Decision-Making Models:A Review of the Literature, Journal of Counseling&Development, 78, 275-283.
  9. FERRELL, O.C. ve GRESHAM, L.G. (1985) A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing, Journal of Marketing, 49, 87-96.
  10. FLEMING, J.E. (1985) A Suggested Approach to Linking Decision Styles with Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 4(2), 137-144.
  11. FRAEDRICH, J, THORNE, D.M. ve FERRELL, O.C. (1994) Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development Theory to Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(10), 829-838.
  12. FRITZSCHE, D.J. (1991) A Model of Decision-Making Incorporating Ethical Values, Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 841-852.
  13. HARRINGTON, S.J. (1997) A Test of a Person-Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision Making in Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 363-375.
  14. HOLLAND, T.P. ve KILPATRICK, A.C. (1991) Ethical Issues in Social Work: Toward a Grounded Theory of Professional Ethics, Social Work, 36(2), 138-144.
  15. HOLLIAN, R. (2002) Management Decision Making and Ethics: Practices, Skills and Preferences, Management Decision, 40(9), 862-870.
  16. JONES, T.M. (1991) Ethical Decision Maki