Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

The Effects of Reserve Requirements on GDP and Investments in Turkey from the Perspective of the Effectiveness of the Monetary Policy Tools: An Econometrik Analysis of the 1987-2004 Period

Para Politikası Araçlarının Etkinliği Perspektifininden Türkiye'de Zorunlu Karşılıkların GSYİH ve Yatırımlar Üzerindeki Etkileri: 1987-2004 Dönemine İlişkin Ekonometrik Analiz

Pages
116–138
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, our results indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the changes in reserve requirement ratio and investments in the long-run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Reserve requirement ratio is one of the most effective monetary policy tools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In our econometric study which covers the period between 1987 and 2004, we analyzed the relationship between the reserve requirement ratio changes and the economic growth and investments in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, our results indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the changes in reserve requirement ratio and investments in the long-run.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Reserve requirement ratio is one of the most effective monetary policy tools. Changes in reserve requirement ratio, when viewed from a macroeconomic perspective, may have more striking effects on economic growth than banking sector. In our econometric study which covers the period between 1987 and 2004, we analyzed the relationship between the reserve requirement ratio changes and the economic growth and investments in Turkey. As a result of our analysis, we did not find a statistically significant relationship between the reserve requirement ratio changes, and the economic growth and investments in the short run. However, our results indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the changes in reserve requirement ratio and investments in the long-run. We also observed a significant relationship between stock returns and growth while we can not empirically find a relationship between stock returns and investments.

Özet

Zorunlu karşılık oranı, para politikasının en etkin araçlarından biridir. Zorunlu karşılık oranlarındaki değişikliklerin etkisine makroekonomik perspektiften bakıldığında bankacılık kesiminden daha çok büyümeye etkisi daha dikkat çekicidir. 1987-2004 dönemini kapsayan ve zaman serilerini kullandığımız ekonometrik çalışmada, Türkiye’de ilk kez zorunlu karşılık oranlarındaki değişmeler ile büyüme ve yatırımlar arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonuçlarına göre, zorunlu karşılık oranlarındaki değişme ile büyüme ve yatırımlar arasında kısa dönemde istatistiki olarak anlamlı bir ilişki yoktur. Bununla birlikte uzun dönemde, zorunlu karşılık oranlarındaki değişme ile büyüme ve yatırımlar arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Uzun dönemde IMKB kazançları ile büyüme arasında anlamlı, yatırımlar ile anlamsız bir ilişki gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇETİNTAŞ, H., BARIŞIK, S. (2022). The Effects of Reserve Requirements on GDP and Investments in Turkey from the Perspective of the Effectiveness of the Monetary Policy Tools: An Econometrik Analysis of the 1987-2004 Period. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 116–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/433198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BASU PARANTAP, (2001), “Reserve Ratio, Seigniorage and Growth”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Summer, Vol:23, No:3, pp.397-416.
  2. BERBER, M. ve ARTAN, S. (2004); “Türkiye’de Enflasyon-Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Teori, Literatür ve Uygulama,” Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Yıl:18, Sayı:3-4, ss.1-17.
  3. BERNANKE, B. S. and BLINDER, A. (1988), “Credit, Money and Aggregate Demand”, NBER Working Paper, No.2534. BRUNNER, K. (1961), “A Schema for the Supply Theory of Money”, International Economic Review, Vol: 2, August, pp.79-109.
  4. BRUNNER, A. D. and LOWN, C. S. (1993), “The Effects of Lower Reserve Requirements on Money Market Volatility”, The American Economic Review, Vol:83, No:2, pp.199-205.
  5. CHARI, V. V., JONES, L. E. and MANUELLI, R. E. (1996), “Inflation, Growth, and Financial Intermadiation”, Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, May/June, pp.41-58.
  6. COSİMANO, T. F. and MCDONALD, B. (1998), “What’s different among banks?” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol: 41, pp.57-70.
  7. DICKEY, D. A. ve FULLER, W. A. (1981), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol:74, pp.427–431.
  8. DICKEY, D. A., FULLER, W. A. (1979), “Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol: 74: 251-276.
  9. ENDERS, W. and GRANGER, C.W.J., (1998), “Unit-Root Tests And Asymmetric Adjustment With An Example Using The Term Structure Of Interest Rates,” Journal Of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol:16, No:3, pp.304-311.
  10. ENGLE, R. F. and GRANGER, C.W.J, (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, Vol:55, pp.251–276.
  11. FABOZZI, F. J. and THURSTON, T. B. (1986), “State Taxes and Reserve Requirements as Major Determinants of Yield Spreads among Money Market Instruments,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol:21, No:4, pp. 427- 436. FAMA, E. F. (1985), “What’s Different about Banks?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol:15, pp.29-39.
  12. FRIEDMAN, B. M. (1999), “The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as an Army with Only a Signal Corps?”, NBER Working Paper, No: 7420. GORDON, R. and VEITCH, J. M., (1984), “Fixed Investment in the American Business Cycle, 1919-1983”,
  13. NBER Working Paper, No:1426. HASLAG, J. H. and HEIN, S. E. (1995), “Measuring the Policy Effects of Changes in Reserve Requirement Ratios”, Economic Review, Federal