Journals / Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19

Emergence of the yacht building cluster at Antalya Free Trade Zone: A researce based analysis

Antalya Serbest Bölgesi'nde yat üretim kümesinin gelişimi: Kaynaklara dayalı bir analiz

Pages
286–312
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that the rapid growth of the yacht building cluster relied on the basic production factors and to a certain extent on the advanced production factors and to favourable demand conditions pointed out in Porter’s Diamond Model; successful firm strategies and competitive initiatives facilitated the development of the collective competitiveness of the cluster, while the taxation, technical regulations and incentive policies under the initiative of the government did not provide adequate support.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to explain resource based reasons behind the rapid emergence of the yacht production cluster at Antalya Free Trade Zone as the first ranking region in Turkey in mega yacht production starting from 2000.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Research questions were explored through in depth interviews with the upper level managers of the yacht building firms, the directorates of the Antalya Free Trade Zone and the Zone Operating Company and the Association of Antalya Free Trade Zone Investors, supplemented by some survey questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that the rapid growth of the yacht building cluster relied on the basic production factors and to a certain extent on the advanced production factors and to favourable demand conditions pointed out in Porter’s Diamond Model; successful firm strategies and competitive initiatives facilitated the development of the collective competitiveness of the cluster, while the taxation, technical regulations and incentive policies under the initiative of the government did not provide adequate support.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to explain resource based reasons behind the rapid emergence of the yacht production cluster at Antalya Free Trade Zone as the first ranking region in Turkey in mega yacht production starting from 2000. Research questions were explored through in depth interviews with the upper level managers of the yacht building firms, the directorates of the Antalya Free Trade Zone and the Zone Operating Company and the Association of Antalya Free Trade Zone Investors, supplemented by some survey questions. The findings indicated that the rapid growth of the yacht building cluster relied on the basic production factors and to a certain extent on the advanced production factors and to favourable demand conditions pointed out in Porter’s Diamond Model; successful firm strategies and competitive initiatives facilitated the development of the collective competitiveness of the cluster, while the taxation, technical regulations and incentive policies under the initiative of the government did not provide adequate support.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı Antalya Serbest Bölgesinde (ASB) 2000 yılından itibaren hızlı bir gelişme göstererek Türkiye’de mega yat üretiminde birinci sıraya yükselen yat üretimi kümesinin gelişimini kaynak temelli yaklaşıma dayandırarak açıklamaktır. Araştırma soruları bölgedeki yat üretim firmalarının üst düzey yöneticileri, ASB ve işletici firma müdürlükleri ve ASB Yatırımcıları Derneği yönetimi ile derinlemesine görüşmeler ve destekleyici soru formları ile sorgulanmıştır. Bulgular yat kümesinin hızlı gelişiminin Porter’ın Elmas Modelindeki temel üretim faktörlerine ve bir ölçüde gelişmiş üretim faktörlerine ve olumlu talep koşullarına dayalı olduğunu, başarılı firma stratejilerinin ve rekabetçi girişimlerin kümenin ortaklaşa rekabetçiliğinin gelişmesini sağladığını, ancak devletin inisiyatifi altında bulunan vergiler, teknik mevzuat ve teşviklerin yeterince destekleyici olamadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİRLİK, O., SARVAN, F., GÜRÇAYLILAR, T. Y., DURMUŞ, E. (2022). Emergence of the yacht building cluster at Antalya Free Trade Zone: A researce based analysis. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 19, 286–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/433168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Antalya Free Zone Directorate, 2008. Antalya Free Zone Operator Inc. – ASBAS, 2007.
  2. AMIT, R. ve SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H. (1993) Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33- 46. BARNEY, J. B. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 99 -120. BARNEY, J. B. (1986) Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, 656-665.
  3. COLLIS, D. J. ve MONTGOMERY, C. A. (1995) Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990’s, Harvard Business Review, July/August, 119-28.
  4. COOKE, P., CLIFTON, N. ve OLEAGA, M. (2005)
  5. Social Capital, Firm Embeddedness and Regional Development, Regional Studies, 39, 1065-1077.
  6. CROOK, R. T., KETCHEN, D. J. JR., COMBS, J. G. ve TODD, S. Y. (2008) Strategic Resources and Performance: A Meta-Analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1141-1154.
  7. DAHL, M. S ve PEDERSEN, C. O. R. (2004) Knowledge Flows through Informal Contacts in Industrial Clusters: Myth or Reality?, Research Policy, 33, 1673 -1686. ENRIGHT, M. J. (1995) Organization and Coordination in Geographically Concentrated Industries, in Lamoreaux, N. and Raff, D. (eds), Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, Chicago University Press,
  8. Chicago. ESSER, K., HILLEBRAND, D., MESSNER, D. ve MEYER-STAMER, J., (1996) Systemic competitiveness: A new challenge for firms and for governments, in CEPAL Review, No.59, August 1996, Economic Commission for Latin America. FOSS, N. J. (1996) Higher-order Industrial Capabilities and Competitive Advantage, Journal of Industry Studies, 3, 1-20.
  9. FOSS, K. ve FOSS, N. J. (2005)
  10. Value and Transaction Costs, Strategic Management Journal, 26, 541-553.
  11. GRANT, R. M. (1991) The Resource –Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, Spring; 33: 3, 114. GRANT, R. M. (1991) Porter’s Competitive Advantage of Nations: An Assessment, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (7), 535-548.
  12. HARRISON, B. (1994)
  13. Lean and Mean, New York. HELFAT, C. E. ve PETERAF, M. A. (2003) The Dynamic Resource Based View: Capability Lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997 -1010. LAWSON, C. (1999) Towards a Competence Theory of the Region, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 151-166.
  14. MAINE INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTER (2008) International Opportunities for Maine: Boat Building & Maine Trades, June. MAIJOOR, S. ve WITTEL