Journals / Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

Euroscep ticism in the Case of Societal Security, Identity, Integration: Content Analysis of Euroscep ticism at Cameron Era

Toplumsal Güvenlik, Kimlik, Bütünleşme Bağlamında Avrupa Şüpheciliği: Cameron Dönemindeki Avrupa Şüpheci-liğinin İçerik Analizi

Pages
191–216
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The major argu- ment of this study is that the UK is soft Eurosceptic which is in favour ofreform in the EU and actually it does not think of leaving the EU.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom(UK) with the announcements made by the government through the contentanalysis method in the period following David Cameron became prime mi- nister.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis was conducted to put forth whether there is an increasein Euroscepticism in the UK.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The major argu- ment of this study is that the UK is soft Eurosceptic which is in favour ofreform in the EU and actually it does not think of leaving the EU.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze Euroscepticism in the United Kingdom(UK) with the announcements made by the government through the contentanalysis method in the period following David Cameron became prime mi- nister. The analysis was conducted to put forth whether there is an increasein Euroscepticism in the UK. At the same time, integration which is seen asa threat in terms of societal security is tried to exp lain how imp acts the de- velopment of Euroscepticism. On the other hand, whether Euroscepticism inthe UK means anti-EU or not and that the UK is either in favour of leavingthe European Union (EU) or reforming in the EU is tried to put forth. Inthis regard content analysis method which is a systematic analysis of verbal,printed, and other materials is particularly emphasized. The major argu- ment of this study is that the UK is soft Eurosceptic which is in favour ofreform in the EU and actually it does not think of leaving the EU.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, İngiltere’deki Avrupa şüpheciliğinin David Cameron Başbakanlığı döneminde hükümet tarafından yapılan açıklamaların içerik analizi yapılarak incelenmesidir. İnceleme, İngiltere’de Avrupa şüpheciliğinin artıp artmadığını ortaya koymak için yürütülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, toplumsal güvenlik açısından bir tehdit unsuru olarak kabul edilen bütünleşmenin Avrupa şüpheciliğinin gelişimine nasıl etki ettiği açıklanmaya çalı- şılmıştır. Öte yandan, İngiltere’de Avrupa şüpheciliğinin Avrupa Birliği (AB) karşıtlığı anlamına gelip gelmediği ve İngiltere’nin AB’den ayrılmaktan yana mı yoksa AB’de reformdan yana mı olduğu ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda, sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyallerin sistematik şekilde analizi olan içerik analizi yöntemi üzerinde durulmuştur. Bu çalışmanın ana argü- manı, İngiltere’nin reformdan yana olan yumuşak Avrupa şüphecisi olduğu ve aslında AB’den ayrılmayı düşünmediğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKURAL, N. K., YÜKSEL, S. Ç. (2022). Euroscep ticism in the Case of Societal Security, Identity, Integration: Content Analysis of Euroscep ticism at Cameron Era. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 191–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/432966

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Buzan, Barry. People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-cold War Era. 2nd ed. Colehester: ECPR, 2007.
  2. Buzan, Barry. Ole Wæver and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc., 1998.
  3. Dağdemir, Elif Uçkan. “Avrupa Birliği’nin Bütünleşme Sürecinde Esneklik Kavramı: Amsterdam Antlaşması Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme”. Ankara Üniversetsi SBF Dergisi 56, 2 (2001): 21-41
  4. Dedeoğlu, Beril. Adım Adım Avrupa Birliği. İstanbul: Çınar Yayınları, 1996.
  5. Flood, Chris. “The Challenge of Euroscepticism”. The European Union Handbook, Edited by. J. Gower. London and Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2002.
  6. Flood, Chris. “Euroscepticism: A Problematic Concept”. Paper presented at the UACES 32nd Annual Conference. Belfast, 2–4 September, 2002.
  7. Forster, Anthony. Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in British Conservative and Labour Parties Since 1945. London: Routledge Press, 2002.
  8. Harmsen, Robert. “A Dual Exceptionalism?: British and French Patterns of Euroscepticism in Wider Comparative Perspective”. Workshop: National Identity and Euroscepticism: A Comparison Between France and the United Kingdom. Centre for the Study of Democratic Government, 13 May 2005. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. The future of the European Union: UK Government Policy. First Report of Session 2013–14. Volume I. 21 May 2013.
  9. Jones, Huw, and John O’Donnell. “EU’s Barnier Warns Britain Against Europe A’ la carte”. Reuters. 1 Şubat 2013.
  10. Kopecky, Petr and Cas Mudde. “The Two Sides of Euroscepticism: Party Positions on European Integration in East Central Europe”. European Union Politics. Vol:3, No:3 (2002): 297-326.
  11. McCormick, John. The European Union. Oxford: Westview Press, 1999.
  12. Özkural, Nergiz. “Esnek Avrupa Entegrasyonu Yaklaşımları Bağlamında Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri”. Türk Dış Politikasında Yeni Yönelimler. Der.: Hasret Çomak ve Caner Sancaktar, 165- 207. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi, 2013.
  13. Skinner, Marianne Sundlisaeter. “Different Varieties of Euroscepticism? Conceptualizing and Explaining Euroscepticism in Western European Non-Member States”. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol: 51, No: 1 (2013): 122-139.
  14. Spiering, Menno. “British Euroscepticism”. Euroscepticism: Party Politics, Naitonal Identity and European Integration. Edited by Robert Harmsen and Menno Spiering, 127-149.
  15. Amsterdam, New York: Editions Rodopi B.V, 2004.
  16. Taggart, Paul and Aleks