Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2012 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Cow's Milk Allergens and their Control Methods

nek Sütü Alerjenleri ve Kontrol Yöntemleri

Pages
114–124
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the structures of cow's milk allergens, the reasons of allergic reaction and some technological methods such as heat treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, Maillard Reaction, high pressure and fermentation applied for controlling the allergens have been reviewed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cow's milk allergy, one of the most common food allergies endemic in childhood, is a reaction arisen against milk proteins after digestion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Studies have been demonstrated that u-lactoglobulin and caseins are the major allergens caused to cow's milk allergy, and other milk proteins have antigenic properties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the structures of cow's milk allergens, the reasons of allergic reaction and some technological methods such as heat treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, Maillard Reaction, high pressure and fermentation applied for controlling the allergens have been reviewed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Cow's milk allergy, one of the most common food allergies endemic in childhood, is a reaction arisen against milk proteins after digestion. Studies have been demonstrated that u-lactoglobulin and caseins are the major allergens caused to cow's milk allergy, and other milk proteins have antigenic properties. Controlling these allergens without elimination of cow's milk from the diet is an important problem to be solved. The complete elimination of cow's milk proteins from diet may have a negative effect on child nutrition; therefore, recently, studies have focused on the effects of food processing methods on controlling the milk allergens. Different processing techniques have been searched to reduce cow's milk allergy. In this study, the structures of cow's milk allergens, the reasons of allergic reaction and some technological methods such as heat treatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, Maillard Reaction, high pressure and fermentation applied for controlling the allergens have been reviewed.

Özet

İnek sütü alerjisi, çocuklarda görülen en yaygın gıda alerjilerinden birisi olup sindirim sonrası süt proteinlerine karşı ortaya çıkan olumsuz bir reaksiyondur. Yapılan çalışmalar inek sütü alerjisine yol açan esas alerjenlerin ulaktoglobulin ve kazeinler olduğunu, diğer proteinlerin de antijenik özelliklere sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. İnek sütünü diyetten çıkarmadan bu alerjenlerin kontrol altına alınması önemli bir sorun teşkil eder. İnek sütü proteinlerinin diyetten tamamen uzaklaştırılması beslenme açısından olumsuz etkide bulunacağından, son yıllarda yapılan araştırmalar farklı gıda işleme yöntemlerinin süt alerjenlerini kontrol altına almada etkisi üzerine odaklanmıştır. Bu nedenle inek sütü alerjisinin azaltılması için çeşitli teknolojik işlemler araştırılmakta ve uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, inek sütü alerjenlerinin yapısı, alerji oluşum nedenleri ve alerjenlerin kontrol altına alınmasında başvurulan (ısıl işlem, enzimatik hidroliz, Maillard reaksiyonu, yüksek basınç ve fermantasyon gibi) bazı teknolojik yöntemler derlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKAYA, T., ŞENGÜL, M. (2022). Cow's Milk Allergens and their Control Methods. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 114–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/432913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bock, S.A., Sampson, H.A., Atkins, F.M., Zeiger, R.S., Lehrer, S., Sachs, M., Bush, R.K., Metcalfe, D.D., 1988. Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge (Dbpcfc) as an Office Procedure - a Manual. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 82 (6): 986-997
  2. Kavas, G., 2008. nek sütü proteinlerine balı alerji olgusu. Hasad Gıda 24 (278): 26-31
  3. Wilson, N.W., Hamburger, RN., 1988. Allergy to Cow's Milk in the 1st Year of Life and Its Prevention. Ann. Allergy 61 (5): 323-328
  4. Isolauri, E., 1997. Cow-milk allergy. Environ Toxicol Phar 4 (1-2): 137-141
  5. Monaci, L., Tregoat, V., Hengel, A.J., Anklam, E., 2006. Milk allergens, their characteristics and their detection in food: A review. Eur. Food Res. Tech. 223 (2): 149-179
  6. Exl, B.M., Fritsche, R., 2001. Cow's milk protein allergy and possible means for its prevention. Nutrition 17 (7-8): 642-651
  7. Fiocchi, A., Brozek, J., Schunemann, H., Bahna, S.L., von Berg, A., Beyer, K., Bozzola, M., Bradsher, J., Compalati, E., Ebisawa, M., Guzman, M.A., Li, H., Heine, R.G., Keith, P., Lack, G., Landi, M., Martelli, A., Rance, F., Sampson, H., Stein, A., Terracciano, L., Vieths, S., 2010. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines. Pediatric allergy and immunology: official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 21 Suppl 21: 1- 125
  8. Dreborg, S., 1995. Allergen Levels Causing Sensitization, Bronchial Hyperreactivity and Asthma. Pediat. Allerg. Imm. 6: 22-26
  9. Isolauri, E., Turjanmaa, K., 1996. Combined skin prick and patch testing enhances identification of food allergy in infants with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 97: 9-15
  10. Guo, B.H., 2001. Dairy Chemistry. Beijing: China Light Industry Press
  11. Fox, P.F., 2003. Advanced Dairy Chemistry. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press
  12. Sawyer, L., Kontopidis, G., 2000. The core lipocalin, bovine -lactoglobulin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1482: 136-148
  13. Reddy, I.M., Kella, N.K.D., Kinsella, J.E., 1988. Structural and conformational basis of the resistance of beta-lactoglobulin to peptic and chymotryptic digestion. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36: 737-741
  14. Wal, J.M., 2001. Structure and function of milk allergens. Allergy 56: 35-38
  15. El-Agamy, E.I., 2007. The challenge of cow milk protein allergy. Small Ruminant Res. 68: 64-72
  16. Goldman, A.S., Anderson, D.W., Sellers, W.A., Saperstein, S., Kniker, W.T., Halpern, S.T.