SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik Gıda / 2015 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Microbiological Quality of Chicken Breast and Thigh Samples Sold in Tokat, Turkey

Tokat Piyasasında Satışa Sunulan Tavuk Etlerinin Mikrobiyolojik Kalitesinin Belirlenmesi

Nilgün ÖNCÜL
Zeliha YILDIRIM
Şeyma CEYLAN
Pages
304–316
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The counts for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria were 8.50x104-9.70x10 cfu/g and 2.70x10-4.84x108 cfu/g in the chicken breast and thigh samples, respectively; for total psychrotrofic aerobic bacteria 1.70x104-9.35x108 cfu/g and 1.74x10-2.06x108 cfu/g; for yeasts and moulds 2.50x103-3.20x104 cfu/g and 2.50x10-1.35x105; for total coliform 4.30x101-2.30x10cfu/g and 2.30x101-9.30x105 cfu/g; for fecal coliform 0.36x101-9.30x10 cfu/g and 2.30x101-2.30x104 cfu/g; for Staphylococcus aureus

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, microbiological properties of chicken breast and thigh sold in Tokat were determined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 25 chicken breast and 25 chicken thigh samples obtained from butchers and markets were analyzed for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, total psychrotrofic aerobic bacteria, yeasts-molds, total coliform, fecal coliform, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium perfringens.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The counts for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria were 8.50x104-9.70x10 cfu/g and 2.70x10-4.84x108 cfu/g in the chicken breast and thigh samples, respectively; for total psychrotrofic aerobic bacteria 1.70x104-9.35x108 cfu/g and 1.74x10-2.06x108 cfu/g; for yeasts and moulds 2.50x103-3.20x104 cfu/g and 2.50x10-1.35x105; for total coliform 4.30x101-2.30x10cfu/g and 2.30x101-9.30x105 cfu/g; for fecal coliform 0.36x101-9.30x10 cfu/g and 2.30x101-2.30x104 cfu/g; for Staphylococcus aureus
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, microbiological properties of chicken breast and thigh sold in Tokat were determined. For this purpose, 25 chicken breast and 25 chicken thigh samples obtained from butchers and markets were analyzed for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria, total psychrotrofic aerobic bacteria, yeasts-molds, total coliform, fecal coliform, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium perfringens. The presence of Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. were also investigated in these samples. The counts for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria were 8.50x104-9.70x10 cfu/g and 2.70x10-4.84x108 cfu/g in the chicken breast and thigh samples, respectively; for total psychrotrofic aerobic bacteria 1.70x104-9.35x108 cfu/g and 1.74x10-2.06x108 cfu/g; for yeasts and moulds 2.50x103-3.20x104 cfu/g and 2.50x10-1.35x105; for total coliform 4.30x101-2.30x10cfu/g and 2.30x101-9.30x105 cfu/g; for fecal coliform 0.36x101-9.30x10 cfu/g and 2.30x101-2.30x104 cfu/g; for Staphylococcus aureus

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Tokat'ta satışa sunulan tavuk göğsü ve butlarının bazı mikrobiyolojik özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Bu amaçla kasap, bakkal ve marketlerde satışa sunulan tavuk göğsü ve butlarından 25'er adet örnek alınmıştır. Örneklerin toplam mezofilik aerobik bakteri, toplam psikrotrof aerobik bakteri, maya-küf, toplam koliform, fekal koliform, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus ve Clostridium perfringens içerikleri belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca örneklerde Escherichia coli, E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes ve Salmonella spp. bakterilerinin varlığı da incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, toplam aerobik mezofilik bakteri sayısı göğüs ve but örneklerinde sırasıyla 8.50x1049.70x108 kob/g ve 2.70x105-4,84x108 kob/g; psikrotrof aerobik bakteri sayısı 1.70x104-9.35x108 kob/g ve 1.74x1052.06x108 kob/g; maya-küf sayısı 2.50x10-3.20x10 kob/g ve 2.50x103-1.35x104.30x101-2.30x106 kob/g ve 2.30x101-9.30x105 kob/g; fekal koliform 0.36x10-9.30x103 kob/g ve 2.30x101-2.30x104 kob/g; S. aureus

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNCÜL, N., YILDIRIM, Z., CEYLAN, Ş. (2022). Microbiological Quality of Chicken Breast and Thigh Samples Sold in Tokat, Turkey. Akademik Gıda, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 304–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/432730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ICMSF (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods), 1998. Poultry and poultry products. In: Microorganisms in Foods. 6. Microbiol Ecology of Food Commodities. Blackie Academic & Professionals, London. Davies, A., Board, R., 1998. The Microbiology of Meat and Poultry. Blackie Academic and Professional, UK. Mulder, R.W.A.W., 1999. Hygiene during transport, slaughter and processing (pp. 277-285). In: Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series, Vol. 25, R.I. Richardson and G.C.Mead (Eds.), CABI Publishing. Tekinşen, O.C., Doğruer, Y., Güner, A., 2000. Et ve Et Ürünlerinde Hijyen ve Üretim Teknolojisi. S.Ü. Basımevi, Konya. Türkiye. Mead, G.C., 2004. Microbiological quality of poultry meat. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 6(3): 135-142.
  2. Mead, G.C., 2004. Shelf-life and spoilage of poultry meat. In: Mead, G.C., (Ed), Poultry Meat Processing and Quality, Cambridge, UK. Uyttendaele, M., Tray, P., Debevere, J., 1999.
  3. Incidence of Salmonella, E. coli and L. monocytogenes in Poultry Carcesses and different types of poultry products for salean the Belgian retail market. Journal of Food Protection 62(7): 737- 740. Conner, D. E., Davis, M. A., Zhang, L., 2001. Poultry-borne pathogens: plant considerations. Poultry meat processing. A. R. Sams (ed.), CRC Press, USA. pp. 137-159.
  4. Hargis, B.M., Caldwell, D.J., Byrd, J.A., 2001, Microbiological pathogens: live poultry considerations. Poultry Meat Processing. Sams, A. R. (ed.), CRC Press, USA, pp. 121-137.
  5. Jİrgensen, F., Bailey, R., Williams, S., Henderson, P., Wareing, D.R.A., Bolton, F.J., Frost, J.A., Ward, L., Humpğhrey, T.J., 2002. Prevalence and numbers of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. on raw, whole chickens in relation to sampling methods. International Journal of Food Microbiology 76: 151-164.
  6. Swartz, M.N. 2002. Human diseases caused by foodborne pathogens of animal origin, supplement article. Clinical Infectious Diseases 34(Suppl 3): 111-122. FAO/WHO, 2002. Statistical information on food- borne disease in Europe. Microbiological and chemical hazards. FAO/WHO Pan-European Conference on Food Safety and Quality, 25–28 February 2002.
  7. Budapest, Hungary. Erol, İ., 2007. Gıda Hijyeni ve Mikrobiyolojisi. A.Ü. Vet. Fak. Besin Hijyeni ve Teknolojisi Bölümü, Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınevi,
  8. Ankara.
  9. Maturin, L.J., Peeler, J.T., 1998. Aerobic Plate Count. In “FDA’s Bacteriological Analytical Manual” 8 th Edition,
  10. Revision A, Chapter 3. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-toc.html. Anoni