SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ağrı / 2022 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Adaptation of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire into Turkish

Ağrı yönetimi öz yeterlilik ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması

Aylin AYDIN SAYILAN
Ezgi SEYHAN AK
Feride EŞKİN BACAKSIZ
Nurşen KULAKAÇ
John Rey B. MACINDO
Journal
Ağrı
Pages
91–99
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In repeated measurements to test time reliability, there was no statistically significant difference between the two measurements (t=0.320, p=0.751), and there were a high power and positively highly significant relationship (r=0.997, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PMSEQ).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study was carried out descriptively and methodologically between September and December 2018 with 214 nurses and 248 nursing students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In repeated measurements to test time reliability, there was no statistically significant difference between the two measurements (t=0.320, p=0.751), and there were a high power and positively highly significant relationship (r=0.997, p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PMSEQ). Methods: The study was carried out descriptively and methodologically between September and December 2018 with 214 nurses and 248 nursing students. The data were collected using the descriptive characteristics form and the PMSEQ. Results: Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.90 in the total scale. In repeated measurements to test time reliability, there was no statistically significant difference between the two measurements (t=0.320, p=0.751), and there were a high power and positively highly significant relationship (r=0.997, p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ağrı Yönetimi Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini incemelektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, Eylül-Aralık 2018 tarihleri arasında 214 hemşire ve 248 hemşirelik öğrencisiyle tanımlayıcı ve metodolojik olarak yapıldı. Veriler, tanıtıcı özellikler formu ve Ağrı Yönetimi Öz Yeterlilik Ölçeği kullanılarak toplandı. Bulgular: Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0,90 olarak bulundu. Zaman güvenilirliğini test etmek için tekrarlanan ölçümlerde, iki ölçüm arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı (t=0,320, p=0,751), yüksek güç ve pozitif olarak yüksek anlamlı bir ilişki vardı (r=0,997, p

🔖

Cite This Article

SAYILAN, A. A., AK, E. S., BACAKSIZ, F. E., KULAKAÇ, N., MACINDO, J. R. B. (2022). Adaptation of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire into Turkish. Ağrı, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 91–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/430541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Schug SA, Palmer GM, Scott DA, Halliwell R, Trinca J. Working group of the Australian and New Zealand college of anaesthetists and faculty of pain medicine. Acute pain management: Scientific evidence. 4th ed. Melbourne: ANZCA & FPM; 2015
  2. International Association for the Study of Pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain. 2nd ed, revised. p
  3. Available at: https:// www.iasppain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumb er=1698&navItemNumber=576#Pain. Accessed Feb 25, 2022
  4. The Joint Commission. Pain assessment and management standards for behavioral health care, 2019. Available at: https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/R3_20_ Pain_standards_BHC_12_21_18_FINAL.pdf. Accessed Feb 25, 2022
  5. Macindo JRB, Soriano CAF, Gonzales HRM, Simbulan PJT, Torres GCS, Que JC. Development and psychometric appraisal of the pain management self-efficacy questionnaire. Journal of Advance Nursing 2018;74:1993–2004
  6. Berry PH, Dahl JL. The new JCAHO pain standards: implications for pain management nurses. Pain Manag Nurs 2000;1(1):3–12. [CrossRef ] 6. Cervo FA, Raggi RP, Bright-Long LE, Wright WK, Rows G, Torres AE, et al. Use of the certified nursing assistant pain assessment tool (CPAT) in nursing home residents with dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2007;22(2):112– 9. [CrossRef ] 7. Herr K. Pain assessment strategies in older patients. J Pain 2011;12(3 Suppl 1):S3–S13. [CrossRef ] 8. Vallano A, Malouf J, Payrulet P, Baños JE; Catalan Research Group for Studying Pain in Hospital. Prevalence of pain in adults admitted to Catalonian hospitals: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pain 2006;10(8):721–31. [CrossRef ] 9. Lindsay L, Kristen B, Micheal D, Tyler V. E.M.: A case report of chronic low back pain. Student-led Mini Grants. https:// dune.une.edu/ceipe_allminigrants/10/. Accessed Feb 25, 2022
  7. International Association for the Study of Pain [IASP]. (2011). Declaration of Montréal. Declaration that access to pain management is a fundamental human right. Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/DeclarationofMontreal. Accessed Feb 25, 2022. [CrossRef] 11. Royal College of Physicians. British geriatrics society and british pain society the assessment of pain in older people: national guidelines Concise guidance to good practice series, No 8. London, 2007. Available at: https://www.britishpainsociety. org/static/uploads/resources/files/book_ pain_older_people