SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adli Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Postmortem Interval in Skeletonized Body

Iskeletleşmiş Cesetlerde Postmortem Interval Tayini

Ramazan AKÇAN
Aykut LALE
Ali Rıza TÜMER
Eyup Ruşen HEYBET
Aysun Balseven ODABAŞI
Pages
71–76
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Weaimed to point that estimation of PMI importance for skeletonizedpart and used methods for estimation of PMI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Postmortem interval [PMI] estimation is an important parameterfor forensic purpose.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore forensic anthropological evaluationproduce significant data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Weaimed to point that estimation of PMI importance for skeletonizedpart and used methods for estimation of PMI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Postmortem interval [PMI] estimation is an important parameterfor forensic purpose. Espically when corpses are skeletonized,PMI estimation is more difficult too. PMI estimation assistthat determination whether the forensic importance of skeletonizedpart. Therefore forensic anthropological evaluationproduce significant data. For estimation of PMI, morphological,physiochemical, serological and radioisotop analysis and alsoexamination of environmental variables can be performed. Weaimed to point that estimation of PMI importance for skeletonizedpart and used methods for estimation of PMI.

Özet

Postmortem interval [PMI] cinayetler başta olmak üzere adliolayların açıklığa kavuşturulması için tespit edilmesi gerekenönemli bir parametredir. Özellikle cesetler iskeletleştiğinde budurum daha da zorlaşmaktadır. Iskeletleşmiş cesetlerde bulunanparçaların adli olarak değerlendirilmesinin gerekli olupolmadığı hususu PMI tayini ile aydınlatılabilmektedir. Bulunanparçaların adli antropolojik değerlendirilmesi ile anlamlıveriler elde edilebildiği bilinmektedir. Bunun için morfolojik,fizyokimyasal ve serolojik, radyoizotop analizleri ile çevreseldeğişkenlerin incelenmesi ile yapılan çalışmalar sonucundaPMI tayini gerçekleştirilebilmektedir. Yazımızda iskeletleşmişparçalarda PMI tayini önemine ve bunun için kullanılan yöntemlereadli tıp uzmanlarının dikkatini çekmeyi amaçladık.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAN, R., LALE, A., TÜMER, A. R., HEYBET, E. R., ODABAŞI, A. B. (2022). Postmortem Interval in Skeletonized Body. Adli Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 71–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/428699

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Jans MM. Microbial bioerosion of bone--a review. In: Wis-- shak M, Tapanila Eds. Current Developments in Bioerosion. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2008:397--413
  2. Kellerman G, Waterman N, Scharefenberger L. Demon-- stration in vitro of postmortem bacterial transmigration. Am Clin Pathol1976;66[5]:911--5
  3. Bell LS, Skinner MF, Jones SJ. The speed of post mortem change to the human skeleton and its taphonomic signifi-- cance. Forensic Sci Int 1996;82[2]:129--40
  4. Marchiafava V, Bonucci E, Ascenzi A. Fungal osteoclasia: model of dead bone resorption. Calc Tiss Res 1974;14[1]:195-- 210
  5. Hackett C. Microscopical focal destruction [tunnels] in ex-- humed human bones. Med Sci Law 1981;21[4]:243--65
  6. Yoshino M, Kimijima T, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. Micro-- scopical study on estimation of time since death in skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 1991;49[2]:143--58
  7. Swift B. The timing of death. In: Rutty GN ed. Essentials of Autopsy Practice. London: Springer--Verlag. 2006:189--214
  8. Knight B. Methods of dating skeletal remains. Med Sci Law 1969;9[4]:247--52
  9. Jarvis DR. Nitrogen levels in long bones from coffin buri-- als interred for periods of 26--90 years. Forensic Sci Int 1997;85[3l:199--208
  10. Knight B, Lauder I. Practical methods of dating skeletal remains: preliminary study. Med Sci Law 1967;7[4]:205--8
  11. Knight B, Lauder |. Methods of dating skeletal remains. Hum Biol1969:322--41
  12. Saukko P, Knight B. Knight's Forensic Pathology. London: Edward Arnold Publishers, 2004
  13. Buchan M, Anderson G. Time since death: review of the current status of methods used in the later postmortem inter-- val. Can Soc Forensic Sci 2001;34[1]:1--22
  14. Hoke N, Grigat A, Grupe G, Harbeck M. Reconsideration of bone postmortem interval estimation by UV--induced autofluo-- rescence. Forensic Sci Int 2013;228[1]:176.e1--e6
  15. Forbes SL. Potential determinants of postmortem and postburial interval of buried remains. In: Tibbet M, Carter DO eds. Soil Analysis in Forensic Taphonomy: Chemical and Bio-- logical Effects of Buried Human Remains, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009:225--46
  16. Pollard A. Dating the Time of Death. In: Hunter J, Roberts CA, Martin eds. Studies in Crime: Arı Introduction to Forensic Archaeology. London: BT Batsford Publishers, 1996:139--55
  17. Introna F, Di Vella G, Campobasso CP. Determination of postmortem interval from old skeletal remains by image analysis of luminol test results. Forensic Sci 1999;44:535--8. Lale A. et al. Postmor