Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15

INVESTIGATION OF THE STRUCTURAL TRENDS THROUGH AEROMAGNETIC DATA FOR THE CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CRYSTALLINE COMPLEX (KIRSEHIR BLOCK), TURKEY

TÜRKİYE İÇ ANADOLU KRİSTALİN KOMPLEKSİ (KIRŞEHİR BLOK) İÇİN AEROMAGNETİK VERİLERLE YAPISAL TRENDLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
498–507
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This phenomenon can be evaluated as the existence of a highly magnetized unit in the region that may have been covered by continental clastic rocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main goal of this study is to delineate the subsurface structural features and depths of the causative sources in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (Kirsehir Block), Turkey from aeromagnetic data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The depths of causative sources were founded to vary between 8.48 km and 1.60 km.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This phenomenon can be evaluated as the existence of a highly magnetized unit in the region that may have been covered by continental clastic rocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Analitik sinyal · Tilt- derinlik yöntemi · havadan manyetik veri

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to delineate the subsurface structural features and depths of the causative sources in the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex (Kirsehir Block), Turkey from aeromagnetic data. To this end, spectral analysis technique, analytic signal (AS) and tilt angle method were applied to the aeromagnetic data. The depths of causative sources were founded to vary between 8.48 km and 1.60 km. The AS and tilt angle method was implemented to regional anomalies and it was seen that the geological units defined by the field observation have a deeper root below the surface. In addition, although there are no rocks that have magnetic properties in the center of the geological map, the existence of a magnetized structure in the tilt map was determined. This phenomenon can be evaluated as the existence of a highly magnetized unit in the region that may have been covered by continental clastic rocks.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, Türkiye'deki Orta Anadolu Kristalin Kompleksindeki (Kırşehir Bloğu), bozucu kaynakların yer altı yapısal özelliklerini ve derinliklerini aeromanyetik verilerden belirlemektir. Bu amaçla aeromanyetik verilere spektral analiz tekniği, analitik sinyal (AS) ve tilt açısı yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Bozucu kaynakların derinliklerinin 8,48 km ile 1,60 km arasında değiştiği tespit edilmiştir. AS ve tilt açısı yöntemi bölgesel anomalilere uygulanmış ve saha gözlemiyle tanımlanan jeolojik birimlerin yüzeyin altında daha derin bir köke sahip olduğunu görülmüştür. Ayrıca jeolojik haritanın merkezinde manyetik özelliklere sahip kayaçlar olmamasına rağmen tilt haritasında manyetize bir yapının varlığı tespit edilmiştir. Bu olgu, bölgede kıtasal kırıntılı kayaçlarla kaplanmış olabilecek yüksek oranda manyetize olmuş bir birimin varlığı olarak değerlendirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIRAN, E. E. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF THE STRUCTURAL TRENDS THROUGH AEROMAGNETIC DATA FOR THE CENTRAL ANATOLIAN CRYSTALLINE COMPLEX (KIRSEHIR BLOCK), TURKEY. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 15, 498–507. https://ajindex.com/articles/428604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Baranov V. A new method for interpretation of aeromagnetic maps: Pseudo-gravimetric anomalies. Geophysics 1957; 22: 359-383
  2. Ansari AH, Alamdar K. Reduction to the pole of magnetic anomalies using analytic signal. World Applied Sciences Journal 2009; 7(4): 405-409
  3. Reid AB, Allsop JM, Granser H, Millett AJ, Somerton IW. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler Deconvolution. Geophysics 1990; 55: 80–90
  4. Roest WR, Verhoef J, Pilkington M. Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics 1992; 57(1): 116-125
  5. Miller HG, Singh V. Potential field tilt-a new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics 1994; 32: 213 – 217
  6. Verduzco B, Fairhead JD, Green CM, MacKenzie C. New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. The Leading Edge 2004; 23: 116–119
  7. Cooper GRJ, Cowan DR. Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers & Geosciences 2006; 32: 1585–1591
  8. Okay AI. High pressure/low temperature metamorphic rocks of Turkey. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 1986; 164: 333–348
  9. Dhont D, Chorowicz J, Yurur T, Froger JL, Kose O, Gundogdu N. Emplacement of volcanic vents and geodynamics of Central Anatolia, Turkey. J. Volcan. Geother. Res. 1998; 85: 33–55
  10. Kadioglu, Y.K., Ates, A., and Gulec, N. Structural interpretation of gabbroic rocks in Agacoren Granitoid, central Turkey: field observations and aeromagnetic data. Geol. Mag. 1998; 135(2), 245-254
  11. Akin U, Ciftci Y. Heat flow of the Kırşehir Massif and geological sources of the radiogenic heat production. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 2011; 143: 53-72
  12. Lefebvre C. The tectonics of the Central Anatolian Crystalline Complex: A structural, metamorphic and paleomagnetic study. in Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2011; 3, 147 p., Utrecht Univ
  13. Van Hinsbergen DJJ, Maffione M, Plunder A, Kaymakcı N, Ganerød M, Hendriks BWH, Corfu F, Gurer D, Gelder GINO, Peters K, Mcphee P, Brouwer F, Advokaat E, Vissers R. Tectonic evolution and paleogeography of the Kırşehir Block and the Central Anatolian Ophiolites, Turkey. Tectonics 2016; 35(4): 983–101
  14. Cinku MC, Hisarli ZM, Yilmaz Y, Ulker B, Kaya, Oksum E, Orbay N, Ozbey ZU. The tectonic history of the Niğde-Kirşehirmassif and the Taurides since the Late Mesozoic: Paleomagnetic evidence for two-phase orogenic curvature in Central Anatolia. Tectonics 2016; 35, 772–811, doi:10.1002/2015TC003956