SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Associating Conceptions in Science Teaching with Daily Life: Water

Ümit DURUK
Abuzer AKGÜN
Fuat TOKUR
Pages
161–178
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Soil properties and nutrient content of the soil samples were also evaluated.--

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this presented work, antioxidant potential of endemic Lavandula stoechas cariensis was investigated.Lavandula stoechas cariensis plants were locally called as “Karabaş otu” and consumed for its beneficialeffects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifteen different locations for plant sampling were identified at around Koçarlı (Aydın) region,and plant samples and soil samples were collected in between April and May.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Soil properties and nutrient content of the soil samples were also evaluated.--
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this presented work, antioxidant potential of endemic Lavandula stoechas cariensis was investigated.Lavandula stoechas cariensis plants were locally called as “Karabaş otu” and consumed for its beneficialeffects. Fifteen different locations for plant sampling were identified at around Koçarlı (Aydın) region,and plant samples and soil samples were collected in between April and May. Four main antioxidantparameters were used for the evaluation of the antioxidant parameters: proline content; total phenoliccompounds; DPPH free radical scavenger activity; and reducing power. Before the antioxidantexperiments, water and methanol extracts of the Lavandula stoechas cariensis plants were obtained.Essential oil content; and micro and macro nutrient of the Lavandula stoechas cariensis samples were alsoinvestigated. Soil properties and nutrient content of the soil samples were also evaluated.--

🔖

Cite This Article

DURUK, Ü., AKGÜN, A., TOKUR, F. (2022). Associating Conceptions in Science Teaching with Daily Life: Water. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 161–178. https://ajindex.com/articles/428363

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akçay, H., & Hand, B. (2008). Farklı şekillerde uygulanan yaparak ve yazarak öğrenme metotlarının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fen öğrenimine katkısı. VIII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Bolu. Alev, N. (2010). Perceived values of reading and writing in learning physics in secondary classrooms. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(11), 1333-1345.
  2. Alvermann, D. E. (2004). Multiliteracies and self questioning in the service of science learning. In W. Saul (Ed.), Border Crossing: Essays on Literacy and Science. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of schoolbased writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29-58.
  3. Bozat, Ö., & Yıldız, A. (2015). 5. sınıf yaşamımızdaki elektrik ünitesinde öğrenme amaçlı yazma etkinliklerinden mektubun başarıya etkisi. Education Sciences, 10(4), 291-304.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, O. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Doğan, N. ve Çavuş, S. (2008). İnformal öğrenme ortamlarında fen konularının öğrenilmesine yazma etkinliğinin etkisi. VIII. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Bolu. Gee, J. P. (2004). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school based literacy. In W. Saul (Ed.), Border crossing: Essays on literacy and science. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing-to-read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710-744.
  6. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Günel, M. (2009). Writing as a cognitive process and learning tool in elementary science education. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 200-211.
  7. Günel, M., Uzoğlu, M., & Büyükkasap, E. (2009). Öğrenme amaçlı yazma aktivitelerinin kullanımının ilköğretim seviyesinde kuvvet konusunu öğrenmeye etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 379-399.
  8. Günel, M., Atila, E. M. & Büyükkasap, E. (2010). Betimleme modlarının öğrenme amaçlı yazma aktiviteleri içerisindeki kullanım varyasyonlarının ilköğretim kuvvet ve hareket konularının öğrenimi üzerine et