Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

The A Method Against “Linguistic Imperialism”: CLIL

Pages
132–138
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Key words: Science education, Student engagement, Scale adaptation, Secondary school students

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:English Language Teaching (ELT) contains many social, economic, educational or political factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, the Content-based Language Learning (CLIL) Method was applied to a 30-person experiment group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Key words: Science education, Student engagement, Scale adaptation, Secondary school students
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

English Language Teaching (ELT) contains many social, economic, educational or political factors. This article will focus on the political effects of ELT. In this context, the concept of “linguistic imperialism” of R. Phillipson will be detected. It preaches that ELT can be a danger for local cultures. It can assimilate the learners in favor of English culture. In order to minimise this danger a solution is developed in this article. Thus, the Content-based Language Learning (CLIL) Method was applied to a 30-person experiment group. CLIL aims to teach content and language at the same time. The content of this study was chosen as Turkish Art History because the researches show that young people do not have knowledge about Turkish Art History and consequently their own local artistic culture. While Action Research Method was used, pre-tests and post-tests were evaluated using Arithmetic Mean Method. Open-ended questions, conversation, observation book and interview methods were included, too. As a result, in the experiment group, an increase in Turkish Art History knowledge was detected. Both groups learned English at a similar rate, but the control group did not have any knowledge about Turkish Art History. Thus, it can be said that CLIL can reduce the assimilative elements that English may reveal as a hegemonic language. Key words: Science education, Student engagement, Scale adaptation, Secondary school students

🔖

Cite This Article

Türedi, H. (2022). The A Method Against “Linguistic Imperialism”: CLIL. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 132–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/428310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abolaji, S.M. (2014). Linguistic Hegemony of the English Language in Nigeria. Medellín–ColoMbia.19 (1), 83–97.
  2. Acar, K. (2004). Globalization and Language: English In Turkey. Sosyal Bilimler, 2(1), 1-10.
  3. Acar, M. (2013). Yerel Kültüre Ait Öğeler İçeren Metinlerin Öğrencilerin İngilizce Okuma Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ege University The Institute of Social Sciences, İzmir.
  4. Aksoy, N. (2003). Eylem Araştırması: Eğitimsel Uygulamaları İyileştirme ve Değiştirmede Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 36 (1),474-489.
  5. Altunal, B. (2015). İlkokul 4. Sınıf İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Türk Kültürüne Ait Değerler Açısından İncelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Akdeniz University The Institute of Education, Anatalya. Andarab, M. S. (2014). English As An Internatonal Language and The Need For English For Specific Cultures in English Language Teaching Coursebooks. (Doktora Tezi). Istanbul University Institute of Education Doctoral Thesis, Istanbul. Anderson, B. (2015). Hayali Cemaatler. İstanbul:
  6. Metis Yayıncılık. Apple, M. (1995). Education and Power. New York: Routledge. Aronowitz, S. and Giroux, H. (1985). Education Under Siege. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul. Aslan, E. (2016). Üretici Bir Etkinlik Alanı Olarak Sanat Eğitiminin Toplumsal Gerekliliği. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi,3 (5), 290-297.
  7. Atkinson, D. (1999). TESOL and culture. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (4), 625-654.
  8. Barışkan, C. (2010). Türkiye’de Hazırlanan İngilizce Ders Kitapları ile Uluslararası İngilizce Ders kitapları Arasındaki Kültür Aktarımı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Trakya University The Institute of Social Sciences, Edirne. Belles-Calvera, L. (2018). Teaching Music in English: A Content-Based Intruction Model in Secondary Education. LACLIL. 11 (1), 109-139.
  9. Bernstein, B. (2000).
  10. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity – Theory, Research, Critique (Revised Edition). Oxford: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers.
  11. Bonces, J. R. B. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian Context. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal. 6 (1), 177-189.
  12. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education. Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A Study of Its Development. Multilingual Matters Ltd. Capone, R., Sobo, R. And Fiore, O. (2017). A Flipped Experience in Physics Education Using CLIL Methodology. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(10): 6579- 6582 C