Journals / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Partner Interaction Questionnaire (PIQ-20-Tr)

Pages
94–98
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The confirmatory factor analyses and fit indexes revealed a high validity of the PIQ-20-TR (X2/sd = 2.131; root mean square error of approximation = 0.054; goodness of fit index = 0.902; adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.933; normed fit index = 0.963, incremental fit index = 0.971; and the comparative fit index = 0.97).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to adapt The Partner Interaction Questionnaire developed by Cohen and Lichtenstein (1990) to Turkish in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The inventory is originally in English, and it consists of 24 items in the original form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The confirmatory factor analyses and fit indexes revealed a high validity of the PIQ-20-TR (X2/sd = 2.131; root mean square error of approximation = 0.054; goodness of fit index = 0.902; adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.933; normed fit index = 0.963, incremental fit index = 0.971; and the comparative fit index = 0.97).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to adapt The Partner Interaction Questionnaire developed by Cohen and Lichtenstein (1990) to Turkish in this study. The inventory is originally in English, and it consists of 24 items in the original form. The Partner Interaction Questionnaire has two subscales (Negative Behaviors and Positive Behaviors). A team of two academics (a family physician and a clinical psychologist) translated the original to the Turkish language, and 11 qualified experts who have a good command of English and are studying in the field of smoking cessation created an expert opinion form (Krippendorff’s alpha = .93). A total of 611 smokers who had admitted to the Ondokuz Mayıs University Family Medicine Smoking Cessation Clinic filled the Partner Interaction Questionnare-20 in Turkish (PIQ-20-TR) at their first visit. One month later, the PIQ- 20-TR was re-administered to these participants (re-test, n = 598). Cronbach’s alpha for the total PIQ-20-TR was .92; for the negative subscale it was .85; and for the positive subscale it was .87. There was a statistically significant relation between the re-test and test scores of both the positive and negative subscales (p < .001). The confirmatory factor analyses and fit indexes revealed a high validity of the PIQ-20-TR (X2/sd = 2.131; root mean square error of approximation = 0.054; goodness of fit index = 0.902; adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.933; normed fit index = 0.963, incremental fit index = 0.971; and the comparative fit index = 0.97).

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAHAN, T. F., TORAMAN, Ç., YALÇIN, B. M. (2022). The Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Partner Interaction Questionnaire (PIQ-20-Tr). Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 94–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/428260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness of fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155–173. [CrossRef] Arrindell, W. A., & van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observations to variables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 165–178. [CrossRef] Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. [CrossRef] Bowes, L., Chollet, A., Fombonne, E., & Melchior, M. (2015). Psychological, social and familial factors associated with Tobacco cessation among young adults. European Addiction Research, 21(3), 153–159. [CrossRef] Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. The USA: Plenum Press. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2017, January 1). Smoking and tobacco use. Quitting Smoking. Retrieved from https://ww w.cdc.gov/ tobac co/da ta_st atist ics/f act_s heets /cess ation /quit ting/ index.htm Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684. [CrossRef] Cohen, S., & Lichtenstein, E. (1990). Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(3), 304–309. [CrossRef] Cohen, S., Lichtenstein, E., Mermelstein, R., Kingsolver, K., Baer, J., & Kamarck, T. (1988). Social support interventions for smoking cessation. In B. H. Gottlieb (Ed.), Marshalling social support: Formats, process and effects (pp. 211–240). New York: Sage. [CrossRef] Fagerström, K. O., Kunze, M., Schoberberger, R., Breslau, N., Hughes, J. R., Hurt, R. D., Puska, P., Ramström, L., & Zatoński, W. (1996). Nicotine dependence versus smoking prevalence: Comparisons among countries and categories of smokers. Tobacco Control, 5(1), 52–56. [CrossRef] Faseru, B., Richter, K. P., Scheuermann, T. S., & Park, E. W. (2018). Enchancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8(8), CD002928. [CrossRef] Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. The USA: Saunders. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999, June 15). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices 1, 2. https://www.org.journal.html
  2. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of B