Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Positional alterations of the Kambin's triangle and foraminal areas in the lumbosacral region

Pages
30–36
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Only the difference in the FA between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at L5-S1 level on the right side was statistically significant (p=0.05).Conclusion: The KTA is wider in the lateral decubitus position than in the prone position at the levels of L4-L5 and L5-S1

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this anatomical study was to compare the effects of the prone and lateral decubitus positions in endoscopic disc surgery on the Kambin's triangle (KT) and neural foramina zones in the lumbosacral region.Methods: The study included 32 healthy volunteers (16 females and 16 males).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bilateral KT areas (KTA) and neural foraminal areas (FA) of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels in the prone and lateral decubitus positions were calculated depending on the freehand region of interest measurements on magnetic resonance images.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Only the difference in the FA between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at L5-S1 level on the right side was statistically significant (p=0.05).Conclusion: The KTA is wider in the lateral decubitus position than in the prone position at the levels of L4-L5 and L5-S1
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this anatomical study was to compare the effects of the prone and lateral decubitus positions in endoscopic disc surgery on the Kambin's triangle (KT) and neural foramina zones in the lumbosacral region.Methods: The study included 32 healthy volunteers (16 females and 16 males). Bilateral KT areas (KTA) and neural foraminal areas (FA) of the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels in the prone and lateral decubitus positions were calculated depending on the freehand region of interest measurements on magnetic resonance images. KTA and FA values for each side and level in the prone and lateral decubitus positions were compared.Results: Mean left KTA value in the prone and right lateral decubitus positions was 0.58 cm2 and 0.69 cm2, respectively, for L4-L5; and 0.69 cm2 and 0.78 cm2, respectively, for L5-S1 levels. Mean right KTA values in the prone and left lateral decubitus positions were 0.54 cm2 and 0.65 cm2 for L4-L5; and 0.69 cm2 and 0.81 cm2 for L5-S1, respectively. The differences in the KTA between prone and lateral decubitus positions for both levels and both sides were statistically significant (p=0.05). Only the difference in the FA between the prone and lateral decubitus positions at L5-S1 level on the right side was statistically significant (p=0.05).Conclusion: The KTA is wider in the lateral decubitus position than in the prone position at the levels of L4-L5 and L5-S1

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜVEN, M. F., KAYNAK, G., AYDINGÖZ, Ö., KANTARCI, F., BOTANLIOĞLU, H., ERTAN, S. (2022). Positional alterations of the Kambin's triangle and foraminal areas in the lumbosacral region. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 30–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/428010

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endo- scopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discec- tomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a pro- spective, randomized, controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:931-9.
  2. Lee DY, Shim CS, Ahn Y, Choi YG, Kim HJ, Lee SH. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discec- tomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;46:515-21.
  3. Schaffer JL, Kambin P. Percutaneous posterolateral lum- bar discectomy and decompression with a 6.9-millimeter cannula. Analysis of operative failures and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:822-31.
  4. Kambin P, Gellman H. Percutaneous lateral discecto- my of lumbar spine: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1983;174:127-32.
  5. Sasani M, Ozer AF, Oktenoglu T, Canbulat N, Sarioglu AC. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for far lateral lumbar disc herniations: prospective study and outcome of 66 patients. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007;50:91-7.
  6. Iprenburg M, Godschalx A. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery in lumbar disc herniation in an economic crisis - The TESSYS method. US Musculoskeletal Review 2008;3:47-9.
  7. Kim DH, Choi G, Lee SH. Endoscopic Spine Procedure. Chapter 14: Transforaminal Surgical Approach. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.; 2011. p. 108- 18. Kafadar A, Kahraman S, Akbörü M. Percutaneous en- doscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy: a critical ap- praisal. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2006;49:74-9.
  8. Finneson BE, Schmidek HH. Lumbar Disc Excision. In: Schmidek HH, editor. Operative Neurosurgical Tech- niques: Indications, Methods and Results. Vol. 2. 4th edi- tion. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.; 2000. p. 2219-31.
  9. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:722-31.
  10. Kambin P, Zhou L. History and current status of percu- taneous arthroscopic disc surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21(24 Suppl):57-61. Kambin P; NASS. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy. Spine J 2003;3(3 Suppl):60-4.
  11. Nellensteijn J, Ostelo R, Bartels R, Peul W, van Royen B, van Tulder M. Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 2010;19:181-204.
  12. Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K. Percu- taneous nucleotomy. A new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Toden Hosp 1975;5:5-13.
  13. Lee DY, Lee SH. Learning cur