Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

A detailed analysis of messages posted on the Turk-Orthopod' mailing list over a 13-year period

Pages
302–306
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, scientific case discussions and other professional issues comprise a minority of the messages.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the content of the Turk-Orthopod mailing list between 2000 and 2013.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: All messages posted to the Turk-Orthopod mailing list were documented and categorized by 4 orthopedic surgeons who were active members of the mailing list into 11 categories based on the content of the messages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, scientific case discussions and other professional issues comprise a minority of the messages.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the content of the Turk-Orthopod mailing list between 2000 and 2013. Methods: All messages posted to the Turk-Orthopod mailing list were documented and categorized by 4 orthopedic surgeons who were active members of the mailing list into 11 categories based on the content of the messages. Results: A total of 15,699 messages were evaluated and included in the analysis. The mean number of daily messages in 2000 was 0.98 messages/day and increased to 7.23 messages/day in 2013. The most common type of message was announcements (37.5%) about national or international congresses, conferences, symposia, meetings, and panels. The second most common type of message was condolence messages (11.7%). Case discussions and academic discussions comprised 6.3% and 4.5% of the messages, respectively. Conclusion: The Turk-Orthopod mailing list serves primarily as an information board and a powerful social media platform for communication among Turkish orthopedic surgeons. However, scientific case discussions and other professional issues comprise a minority of the messages.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, A., ARAZİ, M., GÜLER, F., ÖZYÜREK, S., KÖSE, Ö., DUYGUN, F. (2022). A detailed analysis of messages posted on the Turk-Orthopod' mailing list over a 13-year period. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 302–306. https://ajindex.com/articles/428008

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arazi M. İnternette ortopedi ve travmatoloji ile ilgili hizmetler. Artroplasti Artroskopi Dergisi 2000;11:114–5
  2. Oliver CW. Trauma and orthopaedic surgery on the Internet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:3–6
  3. McLauchlan GJ, Cadogan M, Oliver CW. Assessment of an electronic mailing list for orthopaedic and trauma surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999;44:36–9
  4. Gilas T, Schein M, Frykberg E. A surgical Internet discussion list (Surginet): a novel venue for international communication among surgeons. Arch Surg 1998;133:1126–30. 5. https://tr-tr.facebook.com/ 6.
  5. Franko OI. Twitter as a communication tool for orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2011;34:873–6
  6. Ndukwe AU, Eaton C, Oliver CW. The Mailbase hand surgery electronic mailing list. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24:145– 7
  7. Rodriguez-Recio FJ, Sendra-Portero F. Analysis of the Spanish-speaking mailing list “Radiologia”. Eur J Radiol 2007;63:136–43
  8. Hernández-Borges AA, Pareras LG, Jiménez A. Comparative analysis of pediatric mailing lists on the Internet. Pediatrics 1997;100:8
  9. Arazi M, Kapicioglu IS. Orthopaedic and trauma surgery resources on the Internet: Internet using profile of the Turkish orthopaedic surgeons and the turk_orthopod electronic mailing list. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2000;34:208–16. 12.
  10. Arazi M, Yaman H, Heybeli N. A survey study on “TurkOrthopod”, a Turkish electronic discussion group in orthopedics and traumatology. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004;38:277–81
  11. Morken T, Bull N, Moen BE. The activity on a Norwegian Occupational Health mailing list 1997-2006. Occup Med (Lond) 2009;59:56–8
  12. Hernández-Borges AA, Macías-Cervi P, Gaspar-Guardado MA, Torres-Alvarez de Arcaya ML, Ruiz-Rabaza A, Ormazábal-Ramos C. Assessing the relative quality of anesthesiology and critical care medicine Internet mailing lists. Anesth Analg 1999;89:520–5
  13. Watson DA. Ozbug: an email mailing list for physicians that works. Intern Med J 2003;33:532–4.