Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1

Tibial slope changes following guided growth by the eight-plate: A retrospective comparative study

Pages
31–35
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To prevent TS changes, the eight-plate should be placed in the midline position at the sagittal plane.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the tibial slope (TS) changes following guided growth by the eight-plate and to determine the relationship between the TS change in the sagittal plane and the plate position.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thirty-eight extremities of 23 children (14 girls and 9 boys; mean age = 9.2 years, age range = 3-17 years) were then divided into two groups according to the plate location in the sagittal plane (anterior or midline).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To prevent TS changes, the eight-plate should be placed in the midline position at the sagittal plane.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to investigate the tibial slope (TS) changes following guided growth by the eight-plate and to determine the relationship between the TS change in the sagittal plane and the plate position. Methods: In this retrospective study, children who underwent guided growth by the eight-plate for genu varum or valgum were included. Thirty-eight extremities of 23 children (14 girls and 9 boys; mean age = 9.2 years, age range = 3-17 years) were then divided into two groups according to the plate location in the sagittal plane (anterior or midline). Preoperative and postoperative TS were measured from the medial and lateral tibial plateaus separately. Results: The mean follow-up was 34.3 (range = 12-96) months. The mean preoperative and postoperative medial TS were 4.05 ± 5.65 and 0.83 ± 3.91 degrees, respectively, in 18 patients in whom anterior epiphyseal plates were placed (P = 0.004). The mean preoperative and postoperative lateral TS were 4.88 ± 5.33 and 0.11 ± 3.34 degrees, respectively, in 18 patients in whom anterior epiphyseal plates were placed (P < 0.001). The mean preoperative and postoperative medial TS were 4.2 ± 5.19 and 4.9 ± 6.02 degrees, respectively, in 20 patients in whom midline epiphyseal plates were placed (P = 0.532). The mean preoperative and postoperative lateral TS were 5 ± 5.51 and 4.8 ± 5.7 degrees, respectively, in 20 patients in whom midline epiphyseal plates were placed (P = 0.871). Postoperative TS was decreased in anteriorly located eight-plates, and medial and lateral plateau measurement was significant (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively). Postoperative TS changes in midline-placed eight-plates were not significant regarding the medial and lateral plateaus (P = 0.532 and P = 0.871, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study have shown that TS decreases following guided growth by the eight-plate in children in whom plates are placed at the anterior epiphysis. To prevent TS changes, the eight-plate should be placed in the midline position at the sagittal plane.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇULLU, E., YILDIZ, V. (2022). Tibial slope changes following guided growth by the eight-plate: A retrospective comparative study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/427942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Waters PM, Bae DS, Montgomery KD. Surgical management of posttraumatic distal radial growth arrest in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002
  2. 22(6):717-724. 10.1097/01241398-200211000-00004 2. Marangoz S, Buyukdogan K, Karahan S. Is there a correlation between the change in the interscrew angle of the eight-plate and the delta joint orientation angles? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017
  3. 51(1):39-43. 10.1016/j.aott.2016.05.005 3. Akel I, Yazici M. Growth modulation in the management of growing spine deformities. J Child Orthop. 2009
  4. 3(1):1-9. 10.1007/s11832-008-0145-6 4. Kramer A, Stevens PM. Anterior femoral stapling. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001
  5. 21 (6):804-807. 10.1097/01241398-200111000-00020 5. Klatt J, Stevens PM. Guided growth for fixed knee flexion deformity. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008
  6. 28(6):626-631. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318183d573 6. Stevens PM. Guided growth for angular correction: A preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007
  7. 27(3):253-259. 10.1097/BPO. 0b013e31803433a1 7. Wiemann JM, Tryon C, Szalay EA. Physeal stapling versus 8-plate hemiepiphysiodesis for guided correction of angular deformity about the knee. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009
  8. 29(5):481-485. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181aa24a8 8. Castaneda P, Urquhart B, Sullivan E, Haynes RJ. Hemiepiphysiodesis for the correction of angular deformity about the knee. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008
  9. 28 (2):188-191. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181653ade 9. Goldman V, Green DW. Advances in growth plate modulation for lower extremity malalignment (knock knees and bowlegs). Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010
  10. 22 (1):47-53. 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328334a600 10. Stevens PM, Maguire M, Dales MD, Robins AJ. Physeal stapling for idiopathic genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999
  11. 19(5):645-649. 10.1097/01241398- 199909000-00018 11. Ballal MS, Bruce CE, Nayagam S. Correcting genu varum and genu valgum in children by guided growth: Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010
  12. 92(2):273-276. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22937 12. Stevens PM. Guided growth: 1933 to the present. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2006
  13. 1(1):29-35. 10.1007/s11751-006-0003-3 13. Ogilvie JW. Epiphysiodesis: Evaluation of a new technique. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986
  14. 6(2):147-149. 10.1097/01241398-198603000-00005 14. Sinha R, Weigl D, Mercado E, Becker T, Kedem P, Bar-On E. Eight-plate epiphysiodesis. Bone Joint J. 2018
  15. B(8):1112-1116. 10.1302/0301-620X. 100B8.BJJ-2017-1206.R3 15. Goedegebuure WJ, Jonkers F, Boot AM, et al. Long-term follow-up after