SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Acta Aquatica Turcica / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Length-Weight Relationships of 11 Lessepsian Migrant Fish Species Caught from Antalya Bay (Turkey)

Antalya Körfezi'nden 11 Lesepsiyen Göçmeni Balık Türüne Ait Boy-Ağırlık İlişkisi

Habib BAL
Kadriye ZENGİN
Dilek TÜRKER
Pages
301–304
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Values of the allometric coefficient (b) ranged from2.649 for L. sceleratus 3.392 for D. elopsoides.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Length-weight relationships (LWRs) parameters were calculated for 11 lessepsian migrant fish species, Pempherisvanicolensis Cuvier, 1831, Siganus luridus (Rüppell, 1829), Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775, Sauridaundosquamis (Richardson, 1848), Sargocentron rubrum (Forsskål, 1775), Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker,1855),Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940, Etrumeus sadina (Mitchill, 1814), Dussumieria elopsoides Bleeker, 1849,Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789) and Lagocephalus spadiceus (Richardson, 1845).
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 288 specimens werecollected between 2009-2010 fishing seasons by middle trammel nets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Values of the allometric coefficient (b) ranged from2.649 for L. sceleratus 3.392 for D. elopsoides.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2010 · 288 specimens
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Length-weight relationships (LWRs) parameters were calculated for 11 lessepsian migrant fish species, Pempherisvanicolensis Cuvier, 1831, Siganus luridus (Rüppell, 1829), Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775, Sauridaundosquamis (Richardson, 1848), Sargocentron rubrum (Forsskål, 1775), Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker,1855),Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940, Etrumeus sadina (Mitchill, 1814), Dussumieria elopsoides Bleeker, 1849,Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789) and Lagocephalus spadiceus (Richardson, 1845). A total of 288 specimens werecollected between 2009-2010 fishing seasons by middle trammel nets. Values of the allometric coefficient (b) ranged from2.649 for L. sceleratus 3.392 for D. elopsoides.

Özet

Lesepsiyen göçmeni 11 balık türü, Pempheris vanicolensis Cuvier, 1831, Siganus luridus (Rüppell, 1829), Siganus rivulatus Forsskål & Niebuhr, 1775, Saurida undosquamis (Richardson, 1848), Sargocentron rubrum (Forsskål, 1775), Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker,1855), Stephanolepis diaspros Fraser-Brunner, 1940, Etrumeus sadina (Mitchill, 1814), Dussumieria elopsoides Bleeker, 1849, Lagocephalus sceleratus (Gmelin, 1789) and Lagocephalus spadiceus (Richardson, 1845) için boy-ağırlık ilişkisi hesaplanmıştır. Bu çalışmada orta su trolü kullanılarak, 2009-2010 yıllarında balık avının serbest olduğu dönemlerde toplamda 288 birey elde edilmiştir. Boy-ağırlık ilişkisine ait b değeri L. sceleratus için 2,649 ve D. elopsoides için 3,392 olarak hesaplanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAL, H., ZENGİN, K., TÜRKER, D. (2022). Length-Weight Relationships of 11 Lessepsian Migrant Fish Species Caught from Antalya Bay (Turkey). Acta Aquatica Turcica, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 301–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/427492

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bilecenoglu, M., Taskavak, E., Mater, S., & Kaya, M. (2002). Checklist of the marine fishes of Turkey (Zootaxa 113). Magnolia Press,
  2. Auckland, New Zealand, 194 pp. Elbaraasi, H. (2014). Length-weight relationships for five Lessepsian fish species from the coast of Benghazi, Libya (Southern Mediterranean). Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(3), 178-180. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140303.16.
  3. Erguden, D., Turan, C., & Gurlek, M. (2009). Weight length relationships for 20 Lessepsian fish species caught by bottom on the coast of Iskenderun Bay (NE Mediterranean Sea, Turkey). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 25(1), 133-135. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01198.x. Froese, R., & Pauly, D. (2019). FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org, (version 09 ⁄ 2019).
  4. Golani, D., Ozturk, B., & Basusta, N. (2006). Fishes of the eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Marine Research Foundation (Publication No. 24), Istanbul, Turkey, Gonçalves, J. M. S., Bentes, L., Lino, P.G., Ribeiro, J., Canario, A.V., & Erzini, K. (1997). Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the small-scale demersal fisheries of the south and south-west coast of Portugal. Fisheries. Research, 30(3), 253-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(96)00569-3.
  5. Moutopoulos, D. K., & Stergiou, K. I. (2002). Length-weight and length-length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece). Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 18(3), 200–203. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439- 0426.2002.00281.x. Pauly, D. (1993). Fishbyte section editorial. Naga ICLARM Quarterly, 16: 26. Petrakis, G., & Stergiou, K. I. (1995). Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters. Fisheries Research, 21(3-4), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7.
  6. Ricker, W. E. (1973). Linear regressions in fisheries research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada,30 (3), 409–434. https://doi.org/ 10.1139/f73-072. Taskavak, E., & Bilecenoglu, M. (2001). Length-weight relationships for 18 Lessepsian (Red Sea) immigrant fish species from the eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K., 81, 895-896
  7. Tesch, F. W. (1971). Age and growth. In: W. E. Ricker (Ed.), Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp 99-130.
  8. Turan, C., Gurlek, M., Basusta, N., Uyan, A., Aydoğdu, S.A., & Karan, S. (2018). A checklist of the nonindigenous fishes in Turkish Marine Waters. NESciences, 3(3), 333-358