Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

İKİDİLLİ SÖYLEM ÜRETİMİNDE DİL SEÇİMİNDEKİ SÖZCÜKSEL ERİŞİM MODELLERİ

LEXICAL ACCESS MODELS DURING LANGUAGE SELECTIVITY IN BILINGUAL SPEECH PRODUCTION

Pages
115–128
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These models are analyzed from the.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, locus of language selectivity is discussed in terms of bilingual speech production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The issue of "Concept Selection Model" and "Inhibitory Control Model" is the focus of this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These models are analyzed from the.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, locus of language selectivity is discussed in terms of bilingual speech production. The issue of "Concept Selection Model" and "Inhibitory Control Model" is the focus of this study. Cognitive features behind language switching and language selection process will be presented. The main objective of this study is to explore whether the competition between languages to be chosen in a bilingual mind is determined at the time of conceptual level or at the time of lexical level. In other words, this paper aims to foster how bilingual individuals control their two different lexical systems. It proposes the differences between concept selection and inhibitory control mechanisms in terms of multiple levels of control mechanisms. These models are analyzed from the.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, dil seçim alanı ikidillilik söylem üretimi açısından tartışılacak ve Kavram Seçim Modeli ve Engelleyici Kontrol Modeli kapsamında ele alınacaktır. Dil değişiminin ve dil seçim işlemlemesinin ardındaki bilişsel özellikler sunulacaktır. Araştırmanın asıl amacı ikidilli zihinde seçilecek olan diller arasındaki yarışın kavramsal düzeyde mi yoksa sözcüksel düzeyde mi gerçekleşip gerçekleşmediğini açıklamaktır. Diğer bir deyişle, bu çalışma, ikidilli bireylerin iki farklı dillerinin sözcüksel dizgilerini nasıl kontrol ettiklerini incelemektedir. Bu araştırma, kontrol düzeneklerinin farklı düzeyleri bağlamında kavramsal seçim ve engelleyici kontrol düzenekleri incelemektedir. Bu modeller, La Heij (2005) ve Green'in (1998) bakış açılarından ve araştırmacıların bu kuramsal alanlardaki deneysel çalışmaları açısından değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRAY, F. (2022). İKİDİLLİ SÖYLEM ÜRETİMİNDE DİL SEÇİMİNDEKİ SÖZCÜKSEL ERİŞİM MODELLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 115–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/426967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bloem, I., & La Heij, W. (2003). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 468-488.
  2. Bloem, I., van den Boogaard, S., & La Heij, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 307-323.
  3. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177-208.
  4. Costa, A. & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491-511.
  5. Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilinguals' two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365-397. Gollán, T. H., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Bilingual lexical access. In B. Rapp (Ed.), The Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 321-345).
  6. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  7. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G. A. (2002). Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish--English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16(4), 562-576.
  8. Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexicosemantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, pp 6781Grosjean, F. (1988). Exploring the recognition of guest words in bilingual speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, 233-274.
  9. Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 225-254).
  10. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Grosjean, F., & Miller, J. L. (1994). Going in and out of languages: An example of bilingual flexibility. Psychological Science, 5, 201- 206. Finkbeiner, M., Gollân, T., and Caramazza, A. (2006a). Lexical access in bilingual speakers: What's the (hard) problem? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 153-166.
  11. Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, J., Janssen, N. & Caramazza, A. (2006b). Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(5), 1075-1089.
  12. Francis S.W.(2000). Bilingual Semantic and Conceptual Representation. The University of Texas, El Paso. J.F. Kroll & A. M. B. De Gro