Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

GEORGIA'S PRO-WESTERN PATH: ANALYSIS OF THE GEORGIAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE POST-SOVIET PERIOD

GÜRCİSTAN'IN BATIYA YÖNELİŞİ: SOVYETLER BİRLİĞİ SONRASI GÜRCİSTAN DIŞ POLİTİKASI ANALİZİ

Pages
339–354
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Traditionally Georgia has been regarded as one of the most pro-European countries in the Caucasus region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines the development of the Georgia's foreign policy in the post -Soviet period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to them Georgia is an integral part of Europe and therefore, think that their homeland should be integrated into Euro-Atlantic structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Traditionally Georgia has been regarded as one of the most pro-European countries in the Caucasus region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article examines the development of the Georgia's foreign policy in the post -Soviet period. The article claims that change of government and the political regime has little impact on the foreign policy orientation of Georgia. The main vector of Georgia's foreign policy has been defined from the very first days of independence. Since independence Georgia has chosen pro-European path and its seems almost impossible to change this foreign policy direction. Georgians view their homeland as a European country and believe that their traditions and customs are European. According to them Georgia is an integral part of Europe and therefore, think that their homeland should be integrated into Euro-Atlantic structures. Traditionally Georgia has been regarded as one of the most pro-European countries in the Caucasus region.

Özet

Bu makale, Sovyetler Birliği'nden sonraki dönemde Gürcistan dış politikasının gelişim sürecini incelemektedir. Makale, hükümet değişikliğinin ve politik rejimin Gürcistan dış politikası üzerinde çok az etkisinin olduğunu ileri sürmektedir. Gürcistan dış politikasının ana vektörü daha bağımsızlığının ilk günlerinde tanımlanmıştır. Gürcistan, o günden itibaren, Avrupa taraftarı olmayı seçmiş ve dış politikadaki bu eğilimi değiştirmekte neredeyse imkânsızlaşmıştır. Gürcü halkı kendi ülkelerini bir Avrupa ülkesi olarak görmekte ve kendi adet ve geleneklerinin de Avrupalılaştığını düşünmektedirler. Ve yine onlara göre Gürcistan Avrupa'nın bir parçasıdır. Bu sebeple vatanlarının da Avro-Atlantik bir yapıyla bütünleşmesi gerektiğini düşünmektedirler. Genel ve geleneksel olarak, Gürcistan Kafkas Bölgesi'ndeki en Avrupa yanlısı ülke olarak görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MODEBADZE, V., SAYIN, F. M. (2022). GEORGIA'S PRO-WESTERN PATH: ANALYSIS OF THE GEORGIAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE POST-SOVIET PERIOD. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 339–354. https://ajindex.com/articles/426956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Badri Ambrose Sharvadze (2008)
  2. A history of Georgia, Tbilisi. Democracy & Freedom Watch (2013) Saakashvili warns against Russian moves to take lands in west, http://dfwatch.net/saakashvili-warnsagainst-russian-moves-to-take-lands-in-west-77917Eldal
  3. Mamistvalishvili (2009) Georgian Foreign Policy and Diplomacy, XV-XVI Centuries, Meridiani, Tbilisi. Elections Program 2012. Elections Program of The Political Coalition "Georgian Dream" http://www.ivote.ge/images/doc/pdfs/ocnebis%20saarchevno%20 programa.pdf Europa Press (2013) La UE rubrica acuerdos de asociación y libre comercio con Georgia y Moldavia, http://www.europapress.es/internacional/noticia-ue-rubricaacuerdos-asociacion-libre-comercio-georgia-moldavia- 20131129111506.html Glenn E. Curtis (1994) Georgia: A Country Study, http://countrystudies.us/georgia/
  4. Goga Aptisauri, Claire Bigg (2013) Georgian Villagers Irate As Fence Goes Up On South Ossetia Boundary http://www.rferl.org/content/georgia-russiaossetia/25131531.html
  5. Johannes Wetzinger (2011) Georgiens Außenpolitik unter Michail Saakaschwili: ein riskantes Spiel im Spannungsfeld zwischen Washington und Moskau, http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ipg/ipg- 2011-1/2011-1__06_a_wetzinger.pdf Kober Stanley (2000) Washington's Misguided Support for the BakuCeyhan Oil Pipeline, http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/fpb63.pdf Muskhelishvili Davit, (2012) Georgian History from Ancient Time until 2009,
  6. Tbilisi, Gumbati Publishers.
  7. National Security Concept of Georgia (2011) available from World Wide Web: http://nsc.gov.ge/files/files/National%20Security%20Concept.pdf
  8. Nikolai Sokov (2009) The South Caucasus Corridor after the Russian - Georgian War, available from World Wide Web: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memospdf/pepm_049.pdf
  9. Nodia Ghia (2007) Have Russian-Georgian Relations Hit Bottom or Will They Continue to Deteriorate? http://www.css.ethz.ch/publications/pdfs/RAD-13-15-17.pdf Resolution on Basic Directions of Georgian Foreign Policy (2013) Resolution on Basic Directions of Georgian Foreign Policy, http://www.parliament.ge/images/rezolution/Resolution_English_
  10. Final.pdf Ronald D. Asmus (2010) A Little War that Shook the World: Georgia, Russia, and the Future of the West, Palgrave Macmillan. Rondeli (2001) the Choice of Independent Georgia, http://books.sipri.org/files/books/SIPRI01Chufrin/SIPRI01Chufri n11.pdf The Messanger (2013) Russia's creeping annexation http://www.messenger.com.ge/issues/2871_may_30_2013/2871