Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS MANAGEMENT AS A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT QUESTION: COMPARISON OF USA AND TURKEY

BİR KAMU YÖNETİMİ SORUNSALI OLARAK ÇEVRESEL KRİZ YÖNETİMİ: ABD- TÜRKİYE KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Pages
95–114
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, first crisis management capacity and organization of the public institutions and the governments of USA and Turkey for all types of crisis in general will be discussed, and then some cases of environmental crisis will be evaluated in this context.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Rapidly changing global conditions and various types of crises, the frequency of which is ever growing both in local and global terms, have caused crisis management to become a topic of expertise for the public sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the high level of institutionalism in all parts of the social life expectations of citizens from their governments and public institutions have increased dramatically, which makes it necessary for them to deal with crises more effectively so that the quality of their services would not decline.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, first crisis management capacity and organization of the public institutions and the governments of USA and Turkey for all types of crisis in general will be discussed, and then some cases of environmental crisis will be evaluated in this context.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Rapidly changing global conditions and various types of crises, the frequency of which is ever growing both in local and global terms, have caused crisis management to become a topic of expertise for the public sector. Due to the high level of institutionalism in all parts of the social life expectations of citizens from their governments and public institutions have increased dramatically, which makes it necessary for them to deal with crises more effectively so that the quality of their services would not decline. In this study, first crisis management capacity and organization of the public institutions and the governments of USA and Turkey for all types of crisis in general will be discussed, and then some cases of environmental crisis will be evaluated in this context.

Özet

Kamu kurumlarının günümüz ihtiyaçları neticesinde giderek karmaşıklaşan yapısı ile gerek ülke içinde gerekse küresel düzeyde sıklığı ve çeşitliliği artan krizler, kriz yönetimi kavramının kamu sektörü için bir uzmanlık alanı olmasını gerekli kılmaktadır. Kurumsallaşmanın ve hizmet sektörünün günümüzde ulaştığı seviyelerin bir yansıması olarak vatandaşa hizmetle görevli kamu kurumlarından beklentiler de geçmişe göre büyük ölçüde artmıştır. Dolayısıyla kamu kurumlarının, hizmetlerinde aksamalar yaşanmaması açısından kendi bünyesinde yaşayacağı krizleri iyi yönetmesi bir zorunluluk halini almıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, kamu kurumların yüklenmiş oldukları misyonlar doğrultusunda genel olarak bütün özelde ise çevresel krizlerde müdahale kapasiteleri, ABD ve Türkiye'de yaşanan bazı çevresel kriz vakaları üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDENİZ, B., BOZKURT, Y. (2022). ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS MANAGEMENT AS A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT QUESTION: COMPARISON OF USA AND TURKEY. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 95–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/426942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aykaç, B. (2011) "Kamu Yönetiminde Kriz Yönetimi", Gazi Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 123-132.
  2. Balanco J., Lewko, H. J., Gilligham, D. (1996) "Fallible Decisions in Management: Learning from Errors", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol: 5, No: 2, MCB University Press, 5-11.
  3. Bayazıt, D. Z., Çengel, Ö., Dizdarlar, H. I., Tepe, F. F. (2003) "İşletmelerde Kriz Yönetimi ve Bir Vaka Çalışması", 11. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, 362-379.
  4. Bliss, J., Dorning, M. (2012) "Obama Seeks to Avoid Katrina Comparison in Sandy Response", http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-15/obama-seeks-toavoid-katrina-response-comparison-in-sandy-effort.html, (ET: 15.11.2012).
  5. Coombs, W. T. (2002) "Deep and Surface Threats: Conceptual and Practical Implications for "Crisis" vs. "Problem", Public Relations Review, Vol: 26, Issue: 4, Communication Resources Northwest, 339-345.
  6. Delvin S. E. (2007) "Crisis Management Planning and Execution", Auerbach Publications, NewYork. Elsubbaugh, S., Fildes, R., Mary, B. R. (2004) "Preperation for Crisis Management: A Proposed Model and Emprical Evidence", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol: 12, Number: 3, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 112-127.
  7. Erençin, A., Çakır, B. (2008) "Türkiye'de Belediyelerde Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi", Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Cilt 17, Sayı 4, 23- 43. Fema Brochure (2008) "FEMA, Prepared, Responsive, Committed", FEMA B-653/ July 2008, Department of Homeland Security, (2008),
  8. Washington D.C. Final Report (2013) http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/oilspill/20121210200431/ http://www.oilspillcommission.gov/final-report (28.09.2013).
  9. Forrest, J. C. (2011) "Practical Environmental Crisis Communication: Process and Procedures", Environmental Quality Management, Vol: 21 Issue: 2, 1-12.
  10. Halverson, B. J., Rabenhorst, T. (2013) "Hurricane Sandy: The Science and Impacts of a Superstorm", Weatherwise, Vol: 66, No: 2, 14- 23. Jaques, T. (2007) "Issue Management And Crisis Management: An Integrated, Non-Linear, Relational Construct", Public Relations Review, Vol: 33, Elsevier Inc., 145-157.
  11. Lalonde, C. (2004) "In Search of Archetypes in Crisis Management" Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol: 12 Number: 2, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 76-88.
  12. Lombardi, M. (1995) "Communication About Major Accident Hazards: Credibility of Qualified informers in an Italian City", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol: 4, MCB University Press, 4- 13. Lue