SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

KUVVETLER AYRILIĞI İLKESİ BAĞLAMINDA YARIBAŞKANLIĞA KARŞI SINIRLANDIRILMIŞ PARLAMENTARİZM

CONSTRAINED PARLIAMENTARISM VERSUS SEMIPRESIDENTIALISM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PRINCIPLE OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS

Serhat ALTINKÖK
Pages
171–200
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, these core democratic values served by the principle of the separation of powers be achieved in parliamentary" sysıtems in the framework of the theory of constrained parliamentarism and semipresidentialism have been evaluated

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper "focuses on the systems of the constrained parliamentarism versus semipresidentialism and linkage with the principle of the separation of powers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, what the genesis of the principle of the separation of powers is and brief survey the historical development of the theory handled in this article.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, these core democratic values served by the principle of the separation of powers be achieved in parliamentary" sysıtems in the framework of the theory of constrained parliamentarism and semipresidentialism have been evaluated
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper "focuses on the systems of the constrained parliamentarism versus semipresidentialism and linkage with the principle of the separation of powers. Additionally, what the genesis of the principle of the separation of powers is and brief survey the historical development of the theory handled in this article. More specifically, whether it is possible to achieve successfully the democratic values advanced by the principle of the separation of powers that prevent from government tyranny and arbitrary government is the main question of this inquiry. Furthermore, these core democratic values served by the principle of the separation of powers be achieved in parliamentary" sysıtems in the framework of the theory of constrained parliamentarism and semipresidentialism have been evaluated

Özet

Bu makale, yarı başkanlık sistemine karşı sınırlandırılmış parlamentarizm sistemi ve bu sistemlerin kuvvetler ayrılığı prensibi ile ilişkisine odaklanmıştır. Kuvvetler ayrılığı ilkesinin kaynağı ve bu ilkenin tarihi gelişimi de makalede ayrıca ele alınmıştır. Daha özelde ise idarenin zorbalığına ve keyfi yönetime karşı koruma sağlayan kuvvetler ayrılığı prensibince ileri taşınan demokratik değerlerin başarıyla gerçekleştirilip gerçekleştirilmediğinin incelenmesi bu araştırmanın esas konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Bununla beraber, parlamenter sistemde kuvvetler ayrılığı prensibinin hizmet ettiği temel demokratik değerler, sınırlandırılmış parlamentarizm ve yarı başkanlık teorisi çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTINKÖK, S. (2022). KUVVETLER AYRILIĞI İLKESİ BAĞLAMINDA YARIBAŞKANLIĞA KARŞI SINIRLANDIRILMIŞ PARLAMENTARİZM. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 171–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/426914

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ackerman, Bruce (2000). "The New Separation of Powers". Harvard Law Review 113(3): 633-729.
  2. Ackerman, Bruce (2007). "The Living Constitution". Harvard Law Review 127(7): 1737-812.
  3. Acton, Lord (1949). Essays on Freedom and Power. Ed. Gertrude Himmelfarb. Boston: The Beacon Press.
  4. Adams, John (2000). The Revolutionary Writings of John Adams, Selected and with a Foreword by C. Bradley Thompson, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund. http://oll.libertyfun d.org/titles/592, Accessed Date (19.6.2015).
  5. Albert, Richard (2009). "The Fusion of Presidentialism and Parliamentarism". The American Journal of Comparative Law 57(3): Albert, Richard (2010). "Presidential Values in Parliamentary Democracies". International Journal of Constitutional Law 8(2): 207- 36. Aquinas, St. Thomas (1957). The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas. Ed. Dino Bigongiari. New York: Hafner Publishing Company. https://archive.org, Accessed Date (16.6.2015).
  6. Aristotle (1944). Politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. www.perseus.tufts.edu/, Accessed Date (16.6.2015).
  7. Barber, Nicholas W. (2001). "Prelude to the Separation of Powers". The Cambridge Law Journal 60(1): 59-88.
  8. Barendt, Eric (1995). "Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government". Public Law 4, 599-619.
  9. Bederman, D.J. (2008). The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution: Prevailing Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Bellamy, Richard (1996). "The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation Democracy". Political Studies 44(3): 436-56.
  11. Powers, Rights and Representative Bogdanor, Vernon (2009). The new British Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publications. Bogus, Carl T. (2007). "Rescuing Burke". Missouri Law Review 72(2): 387- 476. Calabresi, Steven G. (2001). "The Virtues of Presidential Government: Why Professor Ackerman is Wrong to Prefer the German to the U.S. Constitution". Constitutional Commentary 18(1): 51-104.
  12. Calabresi, Steven G., Berghausen, Mark E. and Albertson, Skylar (2012). "The Rise and Fall of the Separation of Powers". Northwersten University Law Review 106(2): 527-50.
  13. Campbell, Thomas (2004). Separation of Powers in Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  14. Cox, Adam B. (2007). "The Temporal Dimension of Voting Rights". Virginia Law Review 93(2): 361-413.
  15. Dahl, Robert (1973). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  16. Duverger, Maurice (1996). Le Systéme Politique Français. Droit Constitutionel et Science Politique [The French Political