SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CARBON EMISSIONS IN TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR COINTEGRATION

TÜRKİYE'DE KARBON EMİSYONU VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ: DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN EŞBÜTÜNLEŞME ANALİZİ

Asuman KOÇ YURTKUR
Arzu TAY BAYRAMOĞLU
Pages
31–45
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the econometric analysis, there was no linear relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in Turkey, but a nonlinear cointegration relationship was determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in Turkey is analyzed with linear and nonlinear cointegration techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The linear Engle-Granger cointegration and the nonlinear cointegration method developed by Kapetanios, Shin and Shell (KSS 2006), were applied in the period of 1960-2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the econometric analysis, there was no linear relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in Turkey, but a nonlinear cointegration relationship was determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in Turkey is analyzed with linear and nonlinear cointegration techniques. The linear Engle-Granger cointegration and the nonlinear cointegration method developed by Kapetanios, Shin and Shell (KSS 2006), were applied in the period of 1960-2010. According to the results of the econometric analysis, there was no linear relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in Turkey, but a nonlinear cointegration relationship was determined. Accordingly, we can say that there is a nonlinear significant positive relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth for the long term in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Türkiye'de karbon emisyonu ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan eşbütünleşme teknikleriyle analiz edilmektedir. Çalışmada 1960-2010 dönemi için doğrusal Engle-Granger eşbütünleşme ve Kapetanios, Shin ve Shell (KSS 2006) tarafından geliştirilen doğrusal olmayan eşbütünleşme yöntemleri uygulanmıştır. Ekonometrik analiz sonuçlarına göre Türkiye'de karbon emisyonu ile ekonomik büyüme arasında doğrusal bir ilişki bulunamazken doğrusal olmayan bir eşbütünleşme ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Buna göre Türkiye'de ekonomik büyüme ile karbon emisyonu arasında doğrusal olmayan anlamlı uzun dönemli pozitif bir ilişki mevcuttur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YURTKUR, A. K., BAYRAMOĞLU, A. T. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH AND CARBON EMISSIONS IN TURKEY: AN ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR COINTEGRATION. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 31–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/426825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agras, Jean ve Chapman, Duane (1999). "A Dynamic Approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis". Ecological Economics 28: 267-277.
  2. Ahmed, Khalid ve Long, Wei (2012). "Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis". Procedia Economics and Finance 1: 4-13.
  3. Alam, Janifar (2014). "On the Relationship between Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: The Bangladesh Experience". IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF) 5(6): 36-41.
  4. Arı, Ayşe ve Zeren, Fatma (2011). "CO2 Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Panel Veri Analizi", Yönetim ve Ekonomi 18(2): 37-47.
  5. Artan, Seyfettin, Hayaloğlu, Pınar ve Seyhan, Burak (2015). "Türkiye'de Çevre Kirliliği, Dışa Açıklık ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi". Yönetim ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 13(1): 308-325.
  6. Bruvoll, Annegrete ve Medin, Hege (2003). "Factors Behind The Environmental Kuznets Curve A Decomposition Of The Changes İn Air Pollution". Environmental And Resource Economics 24: 27-48.
  7. ÇŞB, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (1998). Kyoto Protokolü. (http://www.csb.gov.tr/db/iklim/editordosya/kyoto_protokol.pdf, 7 Şubat 2016'da erişildi). ÇŞB, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı (2012). İklim Değişikliği ve Türkiye. (http://iklim.cob.gov.tr/iklim/Files/brostr.pdf, 7 Şubat 2016'da erişildi). Deacon, Robert ve Norman, Catherine S. (2004). "Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Describe How Individual Countries Behave?". UCSB Working Papers. Dickey, David A. ve Fuller, Wayne A. (1979). "Distribution of the Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root". Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(366): 427-31.
  8. Dinda, Soumyananda (2004). "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey". Ecological Economics 49: 431-455.
  9. EIA, U.S Energy Information Administration (2012). International Energy Statistics. (http://www.eia.gov/countries/data.cfm, 10 Kasım 2013'te erişildi). Engle, Robert F., Granger ve Clive, W. J. (1987). "Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing". Econometrica 55(2): 251-276.
  10. Ergün, Suzan ve Atay Polat, Melike (2015). "OECD Ülkelerinde CO2 Emisyonu, Elektrik Tüketimi ve Büyüme İlişkisi". Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 45: 115-141.
  11. Grossman, Gene M. ve Krueger, Alan B. (1991). "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement". NBER Working Paper 3914. (http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914, 24 Mart 2013 tarihinde erişildi). Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. (1995). "Economic Growth and the Enviro