SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

THE MODERATING ROLE OF INDIVIDUALISMCOLLECTIVISM TENDENCIES IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT PERCEPTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT

PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME ALGISI İLE ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIK ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE BİREYCİLİK- TOPLULUKÇULUK EĞİLİMLERİNİN BİÇİMLENDİRİCİ ROLÜ

Zeynep OKTUĞ
Pages
245–266
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are high, continuance commitment drops at its lowest level; if psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are low, continuance commitment reaches its highest level

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to investigate the moderating role of individualismcollectivism tendencies (horizontal individualism, vertical individualism, horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivisim) of employees in the relationship between commitment (affective commitment, normative commitment, continuance commitment).
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, data obtained from 142 employees of a firm oprating in ready-made clothing sector were assessed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are high, continuance commitment drops at its lowest level; if psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are low, continuance commitment reaches its highest level
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the moderating role of individualismcollectivism tendencies (horizontal individualism, vertical individualism, horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivisim) of employees in the relationship between commitment (affective commitment, normative commitment, continuance commitment). For this purpose, data obtained from 142 employees of a firm oprating in ready-made clothing sector were assessed. Results revealed that the interactions of psychological empowerment perceptions with horizontal individualism, vertical individualism, horizontal collectivism have not any contributions on organizational commitment; but the inteactions of psychological empowerment perceptions with vertical collectivism have significant contributions on continuance commitment. If psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are high, continuance commitment drops at its lowest level; if psychological empowerment and vertical collectivism are low, continuance commitment reaches its highest level

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çalışanların psikolojik güçlendirme algıları ile örgütsel bağlılıkları (duygusal bağlılık, normatif bağlılık, devam bağlılığı) arasındaki ilişkide, bireycilik ve toplulukçuluk eğilimlerinin (yatay bireycilik, dikey bireycilik, yatay toplulukçuluk, dikey toplulukçuluk) biçimlendirici rolünü incelemektir. Bu amaçla, hazır giyim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir firmada çalışan toplam 142 çalışandan elde edilen veriler değerlendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile yatay bireycilik, dikey bireycilik ve yatay toplulukçuluk etkileşimlerinin örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde anlamlı bir katkısının bulunmadığını; ancak dikey toplulukçuluk eğiliminin, psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile etkileşime girdiğinde, devam bağlılığı üzerinde anlamlı bir katkı sağladığını göstermektedir. Psikolojik güçlendirme algısı yüksek iken, dikey toplulukçuluk da yüksek ise, devam bağlılığı en alt seviyelere düşmekte; psikolojik güçlendirme algısı düşük olduğunda, dikey toplulukçuluk da düşük ise, devam bağlılığı en üst seviyelere ulaşmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTUĞ, Z. (2022). THE MODERATING ROLE OF INDIVIDUALISMCOLLECTIVISM TENDENCIES IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT PERCEPTION AND ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 245–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/426796

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Khursid, A. (2000). “Impact of Culture on Human Resource Management Practices: A Ten Country Comparison”. Applied Chang, L.C. ve Liu, C.H. (2008). “Employee Empowerment, Innovative Behaviour and Job Productivity of Public Health Nurses: A CrossSectional Questionnaire Survey”. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45 (10): 1442-1448.
  2. Conger, J. A. ve Kanungo N.R. (1988). “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice”. The Academy of Management Review, 13 (3): 471-482.
  3. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). “Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment and Innovation”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (1): 51-59.
  4. Erdoğmuş, N. ve Aytekin, İ. (2012). “Kültürün Psikolojik Hareketliliğe Etkisi: Türk Ve Kanadalı Akademisyenlerin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12 (4): 2521- 2540 Faulkner, J. ve Laschinger, H. (2008). “The Effects of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Perceived Respect in Acute Care Nurses”. Journal of Nursing Management,16 (2): 214-221.
  5. Fuller, J.B., Morrison, R., Jones, L., Bridger, D. ve Brown, V. (1999). “The Effects of Psychological Empowerment on Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139 (3): 389-391.
  6. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. California: Sage Publications. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. California: Sage Publications. Homans, George G. (1958). “Social Behavior As Exchange”. American Journal of Sociology, 63 (6): 597-606.
  7. Jha, S. (2011). “Influence of Psychological Empowerment on Affective, Normative And Continuance Commitment: A Study in The Indian IT Industry”. Journal of Indian Bussiness Research, 3 (4): 263- 282. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). “Özerk-İlişkisel Benlik: Yeni Bir Sentez”. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 11 (37): 36-43.
  8. Kraimer, M. L., Seibert, S. E. ve Liden, R. C. (1999). “Psychological Empowerment as a Multidimensional Construct: A Construct Validity Test”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (1): 127-142.
  9. Li, F. ve Aksoy, L. (2007). “Dimensionality of Individualism– Collectivism and Measurement Equivalence of Triandis and Gelfand’s Scale”. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21 (3): 313-329.
  10. Lincoln, J.R. (1989). “Employee Work Attitudes and Management