Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

THE PROBLEM OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

SİYASET FELSEFESİNDE İNSANİ MÜDAHALE PROBLEMİ

Pages
213–234
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study challanges the idea that rejects humanitarian intervention in order to protect national sovereignty and national interest at the global level although human rights are violated by a state, and it argues that Humanitarian Intervention is a universal obligation to protect human rights and freedoms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:People living within the same political borders not only face unfair conditions in their relationship with each other as well as social, political, and economic institutions but also are exposed to injustice at the international level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Global poverty, civil war, immigration, and global warming are some of the global problems that human beings have to face.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study challanges the idea that rejects humanitarian intervention in order to protect national sovereignty and national interest at the global level although human rights are violated by a state, and it argues that Humanitarian Intervention is a universal obligation to protect human rights and freedoms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

People living within the same political borders not only face unfair conditions in their relationship with each other as well as social, political, and economic institutions but also are exposed to injustice at the international level. Global poverty, civil war, immigration, and global warming are some of the global problems that human beings have to face. Humanitarian intervention has recently morphed into one of the most highly discussed issues in political philosophy due to the fact that human rights have been vastly violated by individual states within the last century. The main purpose of this study is to examine the moral foundations of humanitarian intervention. This study challanges the idea that rejects humanitarian intervention in order to protect national sovereignty and national interest at the global level although human rights are violated by a state, and it argues that Humanitarian Intervention is a universal obligation to protect human rights and freedoms.

Özet

Aynı siyasi sınırlar içerisinde yaşayan insanlar, birbirleriyle ve toplumsal,siyasal, ekonomik kurumlarla olan ilişkilerinde sürekli olarak adil olmayandurumlarla karşılaştıkları gibi uluslararası alanda da adaletsizliklere muhatapolmaktadır. Küresel yoksulluk, iç savaş, göç, küresel ısınma insanlarınyüzleşmek zorunda oldukları bazı küresel sorunlardır. Son yüzyılda dünyanınfarklı bölgelerinde insan haklarının yaygın bir şekilde devletler tarafından ihlaledilmesi insani müdahaleyi siyaset felsefesinde en çok tartışılan araştırmanesnelerinden birine dönüştürmüştür. Bu makalenin temel amacı, insanimüdahalenin ahlaki temellerini sorgulamaktır. Bu çalışma, insan haklarıihlallerine rağmen küresel arenada ulusal egemenliğin ve ulusal çıkarınkorunması adına insani müdahaleye karşı çıkan anlayışı reddederken insanhaklarını ve özgürlüklerini korumaya yönelik insani müdahalenin evrensel ahlakibir zorunluluk olduğunu savunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAOĞLU, M. (2022). THE PROBLEM OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 213–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/426755

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Beitz, Charles (1983). “Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment”. Journal of Philosophy 80(10): 591–600.
  2. Beitz, Charles (1999). Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  3. Beitz, Charles (2000). “Rawls’s Law of Peoples”. Ethics 110(4): 669- 696. Beitz, Charles (2009). The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bricmont, Jean (2006). Humanitarian Imperialism. Çev. D. Johnstone. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  5. Buchanan, Alan (2006). “Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for Vanished Westphalian World”. Ethics 110(4): 697-721.
  6. Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  7. Carr, Edward Hallett (1946). The Twenty Years’ Crisis: 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relation. New York: Harper &Row. Cassese, Antonio (2008). “Foreign Economic Assistance and Respect for Civil and Political Rights: Chile-A Case Study”. The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers. Ed. Antonio Cassese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Geuss, Raymond (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Habermas, Jürgen (2001). İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı. Çev. M. Tüzel. İstanbul:
  10. Kabalcı. Habermas, Jürgen (2005). ‘Öteki’ Olmak, ‘Öteki’yle Yaşamak. Çev. İ. Aka. İstanbul:
  11. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  12. Habermas, Jürgen (2009). Doğalcılık ve Din Arasında Felsefi Denemeler. Çev. A. Nalbant. İstanbul:
  13. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  14. Hehir, Aidan (2010). Human Intervention: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hobbes, Thomas (2008). Leviathan. Çev. S. Lim. 7. Baskı, İstanbul:
  15. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  16. Holzgrefe, J. L. (2003). “The Humanitarian Intervention Debate”. Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. Eds. J. L. Holzgrefe ve Robert Keohane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 15-52.
  17. Lomasky, Loren; Teson, Fernando (2015). Justice at Distance: Extending Freedom Globally. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Lu, Catherine (2006). Just and Unjust Interventions in World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kedikli, Umut (2017), “The Global Justice Dream Related To International Law”. AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 17(3): 229-243.
  19. Keyman, E. Fuat (2006), “Küreselleşme, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Hegemonya”, Uluslararası İlişkiler 3(9): 1-20.
  20. Kocaoğlu, Mehmet (2014). Robert Nozick: Adalet Teorisi ve Temel Kavramları. Ankara:
  21. İmaj Yayınevi.
  22. Machiavelli, Niccolo (2009a). Prens. Çev. A. Tolga. İstanbul: Say Yayınla