SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

UNBRIDGEABLE EPISTEMOLOGY: DEFENDING UNIVERSAL HUMAN/WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN POSTMODERN AGE

AŞILAMAYAN EPİSTEMOLOJİ: POSTMODERN ÇAĞDA EVRENSEL İNSAN/KADIN HAKLARINI SAVUNMAK

Elif Nur ERKAN BALCI
Pages
931–954
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These examples are discussed with links to orientalism, colonialism, and modernism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study discusses the positions of modernism and postmodernism in the postmodern age in the context of morality in general and human/women's rights in particular.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main claim of the article is that modernist epistemology, despite its postmodern rupture, is still influencing international debates on morality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These examples are discussed with links to orientalism, colonialism, and modernism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study discusses the positions of modernism and postmodernism in the postmodern age in the context of morality in general and human/women's rights in particular. The main claim of the article is that modernist epistemology, despite its postmodern rupture, is still influencing international debates on morality. Examples of this are given through current human rights/women's rights organizations. These examples are discussed with links to orientalism, colonialism, and modernism.

Özet

Bu çalışma postmodern çağda genel olarak ahlak, özel olarak insan/kadın haklarıbağlamında modernizm ve postmodernizmin konumlarını tartışmaktadır.Makalenin temel iddiası modernist epistemolojinin postmodern kırılmayauğramasına rağmen ahlak konusundaki uluslararası tartışmalarda hala etkisinidevam ettiriyor olduğudur. Bunun örnekleri makalede güncel insan hakları/kadınhakları örgütleri üzerinden verilmektedir. Bu örnekler makalede oryantalizm,sömürgecilik ve modernizm bağlantılarıyla tartışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, E. N. E. (2022). UNBRIDGEABLE EPISTEMOLOGY: DEFENDING UNIVERSAL HUMAN/WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN POSTMODERN AGE. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 931–954. https://ajindex.com/articles/426663

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (2013), Do Muslim Women Need Saving?,Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  2. Asad, T. (2003), Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  3. Balcı, E.N. (2013), Metnin Bilinçaltı: Edward Said’de Örtük Şarkiyatçılık, Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(2), s.151-167.
  4. Bauer, T. (2019), Müphemlik Kültürü ve İslam: Farklı Bir İslam Tarihi Okuması, (Çev.: T. Bora), İstanbul:
  5. İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Bauman, Z. (1998b), Postmodern Etik, (Çev.: A. Türker), İstanbul:
  7. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  8. Bauman, Z. (2003), Modernlik ve Müphemlik, (Çev.: İ. Türkmen), İstanbul:
  9. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  10. Bauman, Z. (1998a), On Universal Morality and the Morality of Universalism, The European Journal of Development Research, 10(2), s.7-18.
  11. Benhabib, Ş. (1999),
  12. Modernizm, Evrensellik ve Birey: Çağdaş Ahlak Felsefesine Katkılar, İstanbul:
  13. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  14. Bielefeldt, H. (2000), “Western” versus “Islamic” Human Rights Conceptions? A Critique of Cultural Essentialism in the Discussion on Human Rights, Political theory, 28(1), s.90-121.
  15. Bunting, A. (1993), Theorizing Women's Cultural Diversity in Feminist International Human Rights Strategies, Journal of Law and Society, 20(1), s.6-22.
  16. Bush, L. (2001), Radio Address by Mrs. Bush, https://georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011117.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2020).
  17. Desouki, K. (2020), Egypt: Spate of ‘Morality’ Prosecutions of Women Arrests, Jail for Violating ‘Family Values’, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/08/17/egypt-spate-moralityprosecutions-women, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.08.2020).
  18. Donnelly, J. (2007), The Relative Universality of Human Rights, Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), s.281-306.
  19. Giddens, A. (2004), Modernliğin Sonuçları, (Çev.: E. Kuşdil), İstanbul:
  20. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  21. IGFM. (2020), IGFM Auf Einen Blick, https://www.igfm.de/igfm-aufeinen-blick/, (Erişim Tarihi, 09.09. 2020).
  22. IGFM. (2020), Oft Gestellte Fragen, https://www.igfm.de/oft-gestelltefragen/, (Erişim Tarihi, 09.09. 2020).
  23. IGFM. (2020), Toxische Mischung aus Kultur und Religion, https://www.igfm.de/frauenrechte-in-aegypten-toxische-mischungaus-kultur-und-religion/, (Erişim Tarihi, 09.09. 2020).
  24. IGFM. (2020), Frauen Unter der Scharia, https://www.igfm.de/frauenunter-der-scharia/,(Erişim Tarihi, 09.09. 2020).
  25. IGFM. (2020), Heirat im Islam, https://www.igfm.de/heirat-im-islam/, (Erişim Tarihi, 09.09.2020).
  26. IGFM. (2020), Anzeigenkampagne: IGFM verurteilt Diskriminierung von Frauen,https://www.igfm